You need to login to view the following content . Please Login. Not a Member? Join Us
A
B
C
CERTIORARI & MANDAMUS CASES
CERTIRARI AND MANDAMUS
D
E
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PETITION BY ORIGINATING SUMMONS, APPROACH THE COURT SHOULD TAKE
ENFORCEMENT OF BASIS RIGHTS, WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE TO SEEK ENFORCEMENT OF EVERY BASIC RIGHT INFRINGED BY PETITINING THE HIGH COURT
ENFORCEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, RIGHT TO CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF MANDATORY REQUIREMENT TO DEPOSIT TZS 5 MILLION FOR THE COSTS FOR ELECTION PETITION TO BE HEARD, ARTICLE 30(3) AND S.
ENFORCXEMNT OF BASIC RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
F
FILLING OF PETITIONS UNDER THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT, FILLING MUST BE BY ORIGINATING SUMMONS, PETITION TOUCHES ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSITUTION , EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PETIT
G
H
I
J
JUDICIAL REVIEW IS APPLICABLE IF NO ANY OTHER REMEDY
K
L
LIMITATION OF TIME IN WHICH TO APPLY FOR LEAVE FOR CERTIORARI
LOCUS STANDI, LEGAL ACTION AGAINST INFRINGEMENT OF BASIC RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
M
MEANING OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT WITH JURISDICTION FOR JR
N
NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS-THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE INTRODUCTION OF THAT LAW
O
P
PREROGATIVE ORDERS CAN NOT BE ISSUED AGAINST THE PRIVATE BODY
PREROGATIVE ORDER=PRAYER FOR THE PREROGATIVE ORDER OF DECLARATION MUST COME UNDER LAW REFORM FATAL ACCIDENT
PETITION AGAINST THE GOVERMENT
PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF BASIC RIGHT
PROVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS NEED TO BE CONSTRUED LIBERALLY, WITH ELESTIOCITY AND NOT RESTRICTIVELY OR RIGIDLY, COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS NECVESSARY
Q
R
Res Judicata in Public Interest Cases, Interested Person Can Appeal Against the Decision of the High Court in Public Interest Cases
RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE, RIGHT TO SEEK JUSTICE THOUGH COURTS OF LAW, MANDATORY REQUIREMENT TO DEPOSIT TZS 5 MILLION FOR ELECTION PETITION
RIGHT TO A JUST RENUMERATION FOR ONE’S WORK AS QUARANTEED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
S
T
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYER IS VIOLATIVE OF THE EMPLOYEE’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT O WORK
THE DECISION OF THE HIGH COURT DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW-IS APPEALABLE WITH LEAVE
U
V
VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PERSONAL FREEDOM, THE RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON TO BE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTILL PROVED GUILTY AS GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLES 13(6)(B) AND 15 OF THE CONSTITUTION, PROCEDUR
W
WHETHER COMPLAINANTS WHO ARE NOT NATURAL PERSONS MAY HAVE LOCUS STANDI TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION, ARTICLE 30(3) OF THE CONSTITUTION AND SECTION 4 OF THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT ACT
WHETHER HIGH COURT SITTING WITH A SINGLE JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DETERMINE ANY MATTER RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF BASIC RIGHTS QUARANTEED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION SECTION10
WHETHER NOTICE TO THE GOVERMENT IS NECESSARY BEFORE INSTITUTING PETITION
WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR LEGAL AID
Y
Z