You need to login to view the following content . Please Login. Not a Member? Join Us
A
A Confession is Always Presumed to Be Voluntary Until it is Objected, Best Evidence in Criminal Trial, Ability of A Witness to Name a Suspect
A Confession Leading to Discovery is Reliable, Oral Confession Maybe Sufficient by Itself, Cautioned Statement Should be Read Out,
A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission, Ability of A Witness to Name a Suspect,
A DOCUMENT MUST BE READ OUT AFTER ITS ADMISSION
A Document Not Admitted in Evidence Cannot Be Treated as Forming Part of the Record, Annexures are Not Evidence,
A DOCUMENTS MUST BE READ OUT AFTER ITS ADMISSION
A Person Holding a Holly Quran or a Bible Might Tell Lies But Not a Person Holding a Glass of Liquor in the Bar, Evidence Must be Taken Under Oath
A Prosecutor Cannot Tender Exhibit, The Right to Cross-Examine a Witness, The Right to Free Legal Aid, Search and Seizure
A PROSECUTOR CANNOT TENDER EXHIBITS
A Trial Within a Trial, Adverse Inference, Visual Identification
A Trial Within a Trial, Evidence of Visual Identification, The Identification Parade, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission
A WITNESS MAY STATRT HIS STATEMENT WITH SOLEMN WORDS AND PROCEED TO TELL LIES
A WITNESS STATEMENT FILED IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT RESEMBLES A WITNESS STATEMENT FILED IN THE UK COMMERCIAL COURT
A WITNESS STATEMENT
A Witness Who Tells a Lie On a Material Point Should Hardly Be Believed On Other Points, Valuation of Trophies,
ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE THE EXHIBITS SHOWS THAT ONE HAS SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXHIBITS
ABSENCE OF THE WORDS I SWEAR OR AFFIRM CANNOT MAKE A WITNESS STATEMENT WHICH SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE PRESCRIBED FORM DFECTIVE
ACCUSED HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF PLANS AND ACTIVITIES OF CONSPIRATORS
ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSISSIONS, CONFESSION CONTAINED IN A STATEMENT INVOLUNTARY MADE
ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENTS IS THE DOMAIN OF THE TRIAL COURT AND NOT THE PARTIES
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence, Variance Between the Charge and The Evidence, Evidence of Visual Identification,
ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED-CONDITIONS TO ESTABLISH FOR ITS ADMISSION
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXHIBITS IN COURTS OF LAW
Admissibility of the Witness Statement, Trial Court Role in the Admission of Documentary Evidence, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings,
Admission of A Dying Declaration, Circumstantial Evidence, When Death Occurs After a Fight Its Manslaughter, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal,
ADMISSION OF A DYING DECLARATION
Admission of Confession, Subsequent Confession, Where Actual Torture is Involved the Purported Confession Should Not Be Admitted,
ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE FROM CO-ACCUSED
ADVERTSIEMENT FOR TENDER NOT ATTACHED TO PLEADINGS OR TENDERED IN EVIDENCE
AGE OF THE VICTIM IN A COURT OF LAW CAN BE PROVED BY A PARENT VICTIM
ALIBI, WHETHER THE BURDEN IS ON THE ACCUSED TO PROVE ALIBI
AN AFFIDAVIT FOR USE IN COURT IS A SUBSTITUTE FOR ORSL EVIDENCE
ANY PHYSICAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION ONLY AND NOT PRODUCED AS EXHIBIT DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE EVIDENCE
APPELLANT NOT AFFORDED OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINE DEPONENT
APPLICABILITY OF ORDER XX RULE 2 AND 3 OF THE CPD (ZANZIBAR)
Application to Recall a Witness Has to Be Keenly Attended to, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Adverse Inference, Dock Identification, HAMISI LUGUMBA
ASSESSING CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES, TRIAL COURT IS BEST PLACED TO ASSESS THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS
ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE, RE-ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE BY APPELLATE COURT, DUTY OF FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN MAKING RE-ASSESSMENT
AUTHENTICITY OF A DOCUMENT
AINA YA USHAHIDI UNAOHITAJIKA ILI KUTHIBITISHA MAKUBALIANO
A BOY OF 17 YEARS IS NOT A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
ACCOMPLICE WITNESS, FAILURE TO CONSIDER THE DEFENCE EVIDENCE
B
BURDEN OF PROOF- PROOF OF CONTENTS OF DOCUMENTS-PRIMARY EVIDENCE
Being a Witness
BEST EVIDENCE IN SEXUAL OFFENCES IS THAT OF THE VICTIM
Both in Civil and Criminal Cases, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission, Doctrine of Recent Possession
BURDEN OF PROOF SHIFT IN DRUGS CASES AND WEN SHIFT THE STANDARD OF PROOF IS ON BALANCE OF PROBALITIES
BURDEN OF PROOF, BURDEN OF SATISFYING THE COURT THAT THERE HAS BEEN INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, THE PARTY THAT ALLEGES HAS THE BURDEN TO PROVE
BURDEN OF PROOF, DUTY TO PROVE ALLEGED FACTS, THE DUTY TO PROVE IS ON THE PARTY ALLEGING, SECTION 102 AND 102 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT
C
Cautioned Statement Recorded in the Presence of Other Police Officers is Inadmissible, Evidence of a Co Accused, Failure to Consider Defence Case,
CAUTION STASTEMENT, STATEMENT RECORDED BY A POLICEMAN UNDER THE RANK OF CORPORAL, WHETHER STATEMENT ADMISSIBLE
Cautioned Statement Must Be Recorded Within Four Hours After Arrest, Elements of Murder, Delay to Arrest the Accused Person,
CAUTIONED STATEMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN FOUR HOURS AFTER ARREST
Cautioned Statement Recorded in the Presence of Other Police Officers is Inadmissible, Evidence of a Co Accused, Failure to Consider Defence Case,
Certification of a Cautioned Statement, Ability to Name the Suspect at the Earliest Opportunity, Contradictions in Evidence, Visual Identification,
Chain of Custody,
Chain of Custody, Contents of a Judgement, Search Warrant, Failure to Consider the Defence Evidence, DPP Consent, DPP Certificate,
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
CHARACTER EVIDENCE PREJUDICIAL TO THE CHARACTER OF THE DECEASED, WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE WHEN THE DEATH OR OTS CAUSE IS IN ISSUE
CHILD OF TENDER AGE TESTIFIES BEFORE THE COURT OF LAW WITHOUT TAKING AN OATH OR MAKING AN AFFIRMATION, HE OR SHE MUST PROMISE TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOT TO TELL LIES
CIRCUMSTANCES EVIDENCE ALONE MAY FORM THE BASIS OF A CONVICTION FOR MURDER
Circumstances Where Oral Evidence Shall Be Excluded, Oral Evidence Cannot Override Documented Matters, He Who Alleges Must Prove
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, ACCUSED WAS A FRIEND OF CONPIRATORS
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, APPELLANTS SEEN WITH THE DEAD BODY
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
CIRCUSTANNTIAL EVIDENCE
CIRCUSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ALONE CAN SUSTANIN A CONVICTION FOR MURDER
civil proceedings, the burden of proof lies on the party who alleges anything in his favour
CLAIM OF BEING TORTURED -CONFESSION PROCURED THOUGH TORTURE
COMPETENCE IN EVIDENCE
COMPETENCE OF A WITNESS IS GAUGED BY ABILITY TO COMPREHEND QUESTIONS PUT TO HIM AND GIVE RATIONAL ANSWERS
COMPETENCE WITNESS, INVESTIGATOR AS WITNESS
COMPLAINANT’S EVIDENCE IN COURT CONTRADICTING HER ACCOUNT GIVEN TO ANOTHER PROSECUTION WITNESSES AT THE TSCENE CRIME
CONDITIONS FOR THE ADMISSION OF WITNESS STATEMENT -ADMISSION OF A DYING DECLARATION
Conditions for the Admission of Witness Statement, Admission of a Dying Declaration, Suspicion However Strong is Not Enough
CONFESION -A PERSON CONFESSES TO A CRIME IS THE BEST WITNESSES
CONFESSION MADE IN CONSEQUENCE OF A TEMPORAL INDUCEMENT RESULTING FROM VIOLENCE, WHETHER PROPER
CONFESSION
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO APPEND SIGNATURE AT THE END OF THE TESTIMONIES
Contradictions in Evidence, Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases, Delay to Take the Victim to Hospital, Visual Identification,
Contradictions in Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses, Evidence of a Single Witness, Visual Identification, High Court May Regulate Its Own Practice,
Contradictions in Evidence, Dock Identification is Preceded by Identification Parade, Failure to Name a Suspect, Reception of Evidence of a Child,
Contradictions in Evidence, Effect of Closing the Case, Duty to Explain the Rights of the Accused Person, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences,
CONTRADICTIONS IN EVIDENCE
CORROBORATION IN SEXUAL OFFENBCE
CORROBORATION THE EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER YEARS
CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE, WHEN TO BE APPLIED, MEANING AND FUNCTION OF CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE
COURT WITNESS, CIRCUSTANCES UNDER WHICH A COURT CAN CALL ITS OWN WITNESS
CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESSES
Credibility of Witnesses, Contradictions in Evidence, A Witness Who Tell Lies, Reception of Evidence of a Child, Omission of The Word Unlawful
Credibility of Witnesses, Delay to Arrest the Accused Person, Principle of an Adverse Inference, Poorly Prosecuted Case,
Credibility of Witnesses, The Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Cannot Be Interfered With,
CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
CRETERIA FOR ADMISIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
CUSTODY OF EXIBITS, NEED TO KNOW IN WHOSE CUSTODY EXHIBITS WERE KEPT
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO APPEND SIGNATURE AT THE END OF THE TESTIMONIES
CONFESSION, EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENT, CONDUCTS OF THE ACCUSED
COROBOROTIVE EVIDENCE MAY BE CIRCUMSTANTIAL
COURT IS NOT BOUND TO ACCEPT EXPERT OPINION
Competency and Compatibility of Spouses
D
Defence of Alibi, Joinder of Counts in Charge, Visual Identification and Recognition, Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases, Ability to Name a Suspect
DEFENCE OF ALIBI
DEFINITION OF ISSUES-THE COURT HAS POWERS TO CONSIDER ISSUES EVEN IF NOT EALIER RAISED, IF THE SAME WERE CANVASSED AND EVIDENCE LED BY THE PARTIES
DIFFERENCE ON THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED ON AN AFFIDAVIT AND THOSE ON WITNESS STATEMENTS
Discovery of New Evidence is a Ground for Review in the High Court and Not in Court of Appeal, Grounds for Review
DOCUMENT MUST BE READ OUT AFTER ITS ADMISSION
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, ADMISSIBILITY OF DOCUMENT REQUIRED TO BE STAMPED BUT NOT STAMPED, CONTRACT OF SALE OF A HOUSE NOT STAMPED
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, ANNEXES ATTACHED TO THE PLAINT BUT NOT TENDERED IN EVIDENCE IN COURT AS EXHIBITS, WHATHER THE COURT MAY DECIDE A CASE ON THE BASIS OF SUCH ANNEXES
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, ANNEXES ATTACHED TO THE PLAINT BUT NOT TENDERED IN EVIDENCE IN COURT AS EXHIBITS, WHETHER THE COURT MAY DECIDE A CASE ON THE BASIS OF SUCH ANNEXES
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, ANNEXES TO THE PLAINT, WHATHER DOCUMENTS ATTACHED AS ANNEXES TO THE PLAINT MAY BE TAKEN AS DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TENDERED IN COURT
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, ANNEXES TO THE PLAINT, WHETHER DOCUMENTS ATTACHED AS ANNEXES TO THE PLAINT MAY TO BE TAKEN AS DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TENDERED IN COURT
DOCUMENTS NOT ADMIITED IN EVIDENCE DOCUMENTARY EXHIBITS ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BUT NOT FORMING PART OF THE RECORD OF THE SUIT
DISPOSAL OF EXHIBITS AFTER THE END OF THE CASE
E
DOCUMENTS NOT ADMIITED IN EVIDENCE DOCUMENTARY EXHIBITS ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BUT NOT FORMING PART OF THE RECORD OF THE SUIT
EFFECT OF WEAKNESSES OF DEFENCE CASE ON THE BURDEN OF PROOF
ENANCEMENT OF THE SENTENCE
ESTOPPEL, APPLICATION OF ESTOPPELS RULE , SUITS FOR DECLARATION OF PROPER LANDLORD
EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE AND CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE IN APPEAL
EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE ON APPEAL, APPELLATE COURT’S RE-EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE OF TRIAL COURT, PRINCIPLES TO BE APPLIED
EVIDENCE GIVEN WITHOUT CONDUCTING VOIRE DIRE EXAMINATION BUT CORROBORATED BY AN ADULT WITNESS, WHETHER THE OMMISSION RENDERED EVIDENCE WORTHLESS
EVIDENCE MUST BE GIVEN ON OATH
EVIDENCE MUST BE TAKEN UNDER OATH OR AFFIRMATION
EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER YEARS
Evidence of Co-Accused, Search Without Warrant, Who Can Issue a Trophy Evaluation Certificate, Definition of A Game Ranger, Cautioned Statement
Evidence of Handwriting, Expert Evidence, Judgment of a Court of Law Has to Be Reasoned, Principle Against Omnibus Sentencing
EVIDENCE OF HANDWRITTING
Evidence of Recognition, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect,
Evidence of Recognition, Concurrent Findings by The Lower Courts Cannot Be Interfered, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission,
Evidence of Recognition, Visual Identification, Identification by Voice, Suspicion,
Evidence of Relatives orThe Defence of Alibi, Evidence of Recognition, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect,
Evidence of Relatives, Credibility of Witnesses, Concurrent Findings by The Lower Courts Cannot Be Interfered, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts,
Evidence of Relatives, Credibility of Witnesses, Proof of the Victim Age
Evidence of Relatives, Defence Case Must Be Considered, No Particular Number of Witnesses, Clinical Officer is a Qualified Medical Practitioner
EVIDENCE OF RELATIVES, WHETHER EVIDENCE OF RELATIVES SHOULD BE DISCREDITED
EVIDENCE OF TENDER AGE, NEED TO BE CONDUCTED IN A PROPER VOIRE DIRE EXAMINATION
EVIDENCE OF USE OR THREAT OF ACTUAL USE OF VIOLENCE TO STEAL OR RETAIN STOLEN PROPERTY IS ESSENTIAL
Evidence of Visual Identification, Contradictions in Evidence,
Evidence of Visual Identification, Credibility of Witnesses,
Evidence of Visual Identification, Evidence of Recognition, Failure to Evaluate Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses, Defence of Alibi,
EVIDENCE OF VISUAL IDENTIFICATION
EVIDENCE OF VOICE IDENTIFICATION
EVIDENCE RECOGNITION EVIDENCE OF VISUAL IDENTIFICATION
Exception to the Rule that a Prosecutor Cannot Tender Evidence, Evidential Value of Oral and Direct Account of a Witness, Credibility of Witnesses,
EXHIBITS ALLEGED TO BE DANGEROUS DRUGS HELD AND NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY PROSECUTION FOR FIVE DAYS
EXHIBITS NOT LISTED DURING THE COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE PART OF THE EXHIBITS TO BE TENDERED DURING THE TRIAL
EXPERT EVIDENCE, STANDARDS OF ACCURACY AND OBJECTIVITY REQUIRED, ROLE AN EXPERT SHOULD ASSUME
EXPERT EVIDENCE, WHEN AND HOW EXPERT EVIDENCE IS APPLICABLE
EXPERT EVIDENCE, WHEN EXPERT EVIDENCE MAY BE CONTRACTED BY LEVY WITNESSES
EXPERT WITNESESS, OPINION OF AN EXPERT WITNESS CAN WORK OVERRIDE CREDIBLE AND TRUTHWORTHLY EVIDENCE OF AN AN EYE WITNESESS
EXTRA JUDICIA STATEMENT, UNCORRABORATED EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENT
EVIDENCE=MAP TENDERED FOR EVIDENCE MUST BE REGISTERED AND NUMBERED BY THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND MAP
EVIDENCE BASED ON DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
EVIDENCE OF SINGLE WITNESS IS NOT NECESSARY TO BE CORROBORATED
F
FAILURE BY THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT TO RE-EVALUATE EVIDENCE
FACTS IN ISSUE, NEED TO PROVE ALL FACTS IN ISSUE BY EVIDENCE SECTION 7 OF TEA
FAILURE TO AFFIX STAMP DUTY ON AN INTRUMENT, EFFECT THEREOF SECTION 5 AND 46(1) OF THE STAMP DUTY ACT
Failure to Call a Material Witness, The Principle of Adverse Inference, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect, Credibility of Witnesses,
FAILURE TO CALL MATERIAL WITNESS-THE DOCRINE OF ADVERSE INFERENCE
Failure to Consider the Defence Case, Rape is Not Proved by Medical Evidence Alone, Proof of The Victim Age
FAILURE TO SUMMON KEY WITNESS WEAKEN THE PROSECUTION CASE
Failure to Cross Examine a Witness Does Not Mean that His Evidence Will Be Taken as it is, Failure to Call Material Witness, Best Evidence in Sexual,
Failure to Cross Examine a Witness, Evidence of Visual Identification, Failure to Evaluate Evidence, Requirement to Read Out the Witnesses Evidence,
FAILURE TO CROSS EXAMINE A WITNESSES
FAILURE TO EXAMINE COPY WITH THE ORIGINAL, EFFECT OF SUCH FAILURE
FAILURE TO NAME A SUSPECT AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY RENDERS THE EVIDENCE OF THE WITNESSES HIGHLY SUSPECT AND UNRELIABLE
Failure to Raise an Objection During the Admission of Exhibits, Admission of Exhibits, A Trial Within a Trial,
Failure to Tender Evidence in Court, Failure to Tender the Item Which is the Subject Matter of the Charge, the Charge Remain Unproved,
FAILURE TO TENDER PHYSISCAL OBJECT, IT IS NOT ALWAYS THAT EXHIBITS HAVE TO BE BROUGHT IN COURT TO PROVE AN OFFENCE
Fingerprint Evidence, Confession, Cautioned Statement, A Trial Within a Trial, Admission of Evidence Illegally Obtained, Visual Identification,
FIRST APPELLATE COURT MAKES FRESH EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE AND COMES TO ITS OWN CONCLUSION AND VARIES THE TRIAL COURT’S FINDINGS ON CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
FAILURE TO READ OUT THE CONTENTS OF A DOCUMENT AFTER ITS ADMISSION IN EVIDENCE IS AN INCURRABLE IRREGULARITY
FAILURE TO CROSS EXAMINE A WITNESS ON A CERTAIN MATTER IS DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED THAT MATTER AND WILL BE ESTOPPED FROM ASKING THE TRIAL THE TRIAL COURT TO DISBELIEVE WHAT THE WITNESS SAID
FAILURE OF CROSS EXAMINING A WITNESS UPON A PARTICULAR MATTER
G
GRAVE SUSPICION AGAINST AN ACCUSED
H
HEARSAY EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE
HEARSAY EVIDENCE IS INCAPABLE OF GROUNDING A CONVICTION
HEARSAY EVIDENCE, HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN PRIMARY COURT, WHETHER HEARSAY EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE IN PRIMARY COURT
HOSTILE WITNESS, STATEMENT MADE BY WITNESS WHO LATER RETRACTS IT AND IS DECLARED A HOSTILE WITNESS, WHETHER THAT STATEMENT MAY FORM THE BAISI OF CONVICTION
I
IDENTIFICATION BY NAME, WHATHER IDENTIFICATION BY NAME IS SATISFACTORY WHERE THE WITNESS KNOWS THE ACCUSED PERSONS
IDENTIFICATION BY NAME, WHETHER IDENTIFICATION BY NAME IS SATISFACTORY WHERE THE WITNESS KNOWS THE ACCUSED PERSONS
IDENTIFICATION OF OFFENDEWR, OFFENDER NOT NAMED BY A WITNESSES WHEN THE FIST OPPORTUNITY PRESENTED ITSELF, OFFENDER NAMED AFTER SOMETIME, CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
IN ABSENCE OF THE VICTIM’S EVIDENCE MEDICAL EVIDENCE COMES IN TO PROVE THE OCCURANCE OF SEXUAL INTERCOURSE
IN SOME DESERVING CASES, AN EXHIBIT NOT READ OUT LOUD AFTER ADMISSION MAY BE RELIED UPON BY COURT OF LAW
IRREGULARTIES IN AN IDENTIFICATION PARADE, WHETHER ANY IRREGULARITY IN CONDUCTING PARADE VIOLATES THE WHOLE IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
IS AN AFFIDAVIT DFECTIVE IF THE DEPONENT SIGN IT BEFORE APPERARING BEFORE COMMISIONER FOR OATH
IT IS A MANDATORY REQUIREMENT THAT A WITNESS MUST BE SWORN OR AFFIRM BEFORE HIS EVIDENCE IS RECORDED
IT IS NOT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT THAT THE ACCUSED PERSON SHOULD BE REMINDED OF THE CHARGE BEFORE PRONOUNCING A JUDGEMENT AGAINST HIM
It is the Duty of the Court to Examine Whether the Documents Produced in Court Were Legally Issued, Re-Evaluation of Evidence,
J
JUDICIAL NOTICE, FACTS NOT REQUIRING PROOF
JUDICIAL NOTICE
K
KILA SHAHIDI ANA HAKI YA KUAMINIWA
L
LIES, WHEN LIES BY AN ACCUSED PERSON CAN BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING HIS GUILT
M
Meaning of an Examination in Chief, Magistrate has No Mandate to Examine the Witnesses in Chief, Principle of Fair Trial, Right to be Heard,
MEDICAL EVIDENCE, ADVERSE MEDICAL EVIDENCE, WHETHERN CONCLUSIVE AS AGAINST THE EVIDENCE OF A CREDIBLE EYE WITNESS
MISHANDLING OF EXHIBITS
N
NATURAL JUSTICE REQUIRED AN OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINE THE DEPONENT
New Position, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Conviction Can Be Based On Only S. 127(6) Without Complying with S. 127(2),
Not Every Witness with an Interest to Serve is an Accomplice, Presumption Regarding Being Found in Possession of a Forged Document, Common Intention
NUMBER OF WITNESS, TEST FOR IDENTIFICATION PARADE
O
Object Not Tendered as an Exhibit Does Not Form Part of the Evidence, Inventories Are Used in Proceedings Involving Perishable Items,
ONLY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE IS WORTH CORROBORATION
ORAL EVIDENCE CAN PROVE THE CASE IN THE ABSENCE OF A DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
P
PNCIPLES APPLICABLE IN GROUNDING A CONVICTION ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
PRESUMPTION OF EXISTENCE OF FACT, WHETHER PERSON FOUND IN POSSESSION OF PROPERTY OF MURDEWRED PERSON AT THE TIME OF MURDER MAY BE PRESUMED TO HAVE TAKEN IN HIS MURDER SECTION122 OF TEA
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING CONTRADICTIONS IN EVIDENCE
Principles Governing Reliability of the Circumstantial Evidence, The Defence of Insanity, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials,
PROCEDURE OF STORAGE AFTER SEIZURE OF SUBSTANCES ALLEGLY BE NARCOTIC DRUGS FROM SUSPECTS
PROCEDURE WHERE ANY OBJECTION IS MADE AGAINST THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE
PROOF OF A PERSON WHO MADE MICROFILMS AND PERSON WHO KEPT CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF THE SAME
Proof of Fraud in Civil Cases, Admission of Evidence of Handwriting, He Who Alleges Must Prove, Non-Inclusion of Document in Record of Appeal,
PROOF OF MONEY LAUNDERING-FORGERY-IS A PREDICATE OFFENCE HENCE-MONEY LAUNDERING -PROOF OF A PREDICATE OFFENCE LIKE FORGERY
PROOF OF THE VICTIM’S AGE RAPE CASES
PROOF OF VICTIM’S AGE
PROOFING OF IDENTIFICATION BY SINGLE WITNESSES, SORROUNDING CIRCUSTANCES, CREDIBILITY OF WITNESES
PROSECUTION CANNOT TENDER EXHIBITS
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, REPORT OF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
PURPOSE OF OATH
PRINCILES
Q
R
Reception of Evidence in the CMA, Only Evidence Taken Without Oath Will Be Nullified, Omission by the Arbitrator of the CMA to Append a Signature,
RE CALL OF WITNESS SECTION 147 (4)
Reasons for Admitting Documents Which Were Not Listed, Obiter Dictum, Review is Not an Appeal in Disguise, There Must Be an End to Litigation,
RECEEPTION OF EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE-THE LAW AFTER 2016
RECENT POSSESION
Reception of Additional Evidence on Appeal at the Court of Appeal, Leave to Add Additional Ground of Appeal
RECEPTION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE ON APPEAL
Reception of Evidence in the CMA, Evidence Must Be Given Under Oath,
Reception of Evidence in the CMA, Evidence Must Be Given Under Oath
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Defence of Alibi, PF3 is Not the Only Evidence to Prove the Offence of Rape
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, No Particular Number of Witnesses is Required, Proof of The Victim Age in Rape,
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Sentence for Rape Committed to A Girl Below the Age of 10 Years,
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Sentence for Rape of a Girl Under the Age of 10 Years is Life Imprisonment,
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE-THE LAW BEFORE 2016
Reception of The Evidence of a Child of Tender Age,
Reception of The Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, The Law Before 2016, Voire Dire Test, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission,
Recording The Statements in the Presence of Other Police Officers, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials, Retrial Principles
RELEVANCE OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM ACCUSED IN POLICE CUSTODY-A CONFESSION LEADING TO DISCOVERY IS RELIABLE
REPATRIATION OF AN EMPLOYEE, FAILURE OF CROSS EXAMINING A WITNESS UPON A PARTICULAR MATTER
REPE IS AN ACCUSATION EASILY TO BE MADE AND HARD TO BE PROVED AND HARDER TO BE DEFENDEDBY THE PARTY ACCUSED, THOUGH NEVER SO INNOCENT
RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINE, ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT TAKEN ON APPEAL
RE-EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE BY FIRST APPELLATE COURT
S
STAGES FOR A WITNESS TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY IN COURT-CRIMINAL CASES
SOME APPELLANTS DID NOT TESTIFY AT THE TRIAL, APPELLANTS REPRESENTED BY ADVOCATE, WHETHER APPELLANTS ENTITLED TO OBTAIN JUDGEMENT IN THEIR FAVOUR
STANDARD OF PROOF IN CIVIL CASES
STATEMENT MADE TO A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE IN THE PRESENCE OF A COURT MESSENGER AND POLICE, WHTHER STATEMENT IWAS TRUE AND FREELY MADE
Statement Not Objected Will Be Presumed to Have Been Voluntarily Made, He Who Confesses to A Crime is the Best Witness, First Offender
STATEMENT OF ACCUSED BEFORE THE POLICE, MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE ACCUSED
STATEMENT PURPORTED TO BE CONFESSION, STATEMENT NEVER PUT IN EVIDENCE, STATEMENT REPUDIATED
STAGES FOR A WITNESS TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY IN COURT-CRIMINAL CASES
T
TESTIMONY BY ACCUSED PERSON, ACCUSED PERSON REFUSING TO ANSWER QUESTION, WHETHER ACCUSED PERSON WHO OPTS TO TESTIFY MAY REFUSE TO ANSWER QUESTION
THE ABILITY TO NAME A SUSPECT AT THE EALIEST OPPORTUNITY
THE ADMISSIBILITY OF DATA MESSAGE-DEFINITION OF DATA MESSAGE-THE LAW DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY SIGNATURE BY ANYONE TO AUTHENTICATE A DATA MESSAGE
THE BESR EVIDENCE IN SEXUAL OFFENCES IS THE ONE WHICH COMES FROM THE VICTIM
THE BEST EVIDENCE IN RAPE OFFENCES COMES FROM THE VICTIM
The Determination of Authenticity of a Signature on a Document is a Task for Forensic Document Examiners, Failure to Take Essential Steps,
THE DOCRINE OF ESTOPPEL
THE ENDORSEMENT OF EXHIBITS UPON BEING ADMITTED IN THE EVIDENCE
THE HANDLING OF EXHIBITS
The Law Regarding the Value and Weight of a Retracted or Repudiated Confessional Statement,
THE LAW REGARDS THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES IS SETTLED THAT EVERY WITNESSES IS ENTITLED CREDENCE UNLESS THERE ARE COGENT REASONS NOT TO BELIEVE A WITNESS.
THE LAW REQUIRES DOCUMENTS TO BE RELIED UPON BY PARTIES TO BE ATTACHED IN THE PLEADINGS TO FORM PART OF THE PLEADINGS
THE MEANING OF AN INVOICE-INVOICE IS NOT A PROOF OF PAYMENT
THE MERE FILLING OF THE WITNESS STATEMENT DOES NOT MAKE IT AMOUNTS TO EVIDENCE IN CHIEF
THE NEED FOR A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY IN ADMISSION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
THE OFFENCE ATTEMPTED RAPE IS COMMITTED WHEN A PERSON’S INTENTION TO COMMIT THE OFFENCE OF RAPE IS FRUSTATED BEFORE HE COMMITS IT FULLY
THE OFFENCE OF BEING FOUND IN A GAME RESERVE WITHOUT A PERMIT
THE RECEPTION OF EVIDECE OF A CHILD TENDER AGE
THE REQUIREEMENT TO READ THE WITNESSSES TESTIMONIES TO THE WITNESSSES AFTER THEY HAD TESTIFIED
THE RIGHT TO CALL ANOTHER WITNESS
THE TEST OF TENDERING EXHIBIT-WHO MAY TENDER EXHIBIT
THERE IS NO LAW PREVENTING LAW ENFOECEMENT AGENTS FROM TESTIFYING ON A MATTER RELATED TO THEIR WORK OR OTHERWISE, CREDIBILITY OF WITNESS
THERE IS NO LAW WHICH PROHIBITS ANY EMPLOYEE TO GIVE EVIDENCE IN FAVOUR OF HIS EMPLOYER AGAINST FELLOW EMPLOYEE WHO COMMITS CRIMINAL OFFENCES
There Is No Specific Number of Witnesses Required to Prove the Fact in Issue, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts, Visual Identification
THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INTERPRETER- PROCURING THE INTERPRETER IS A RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COURT
U
Unfair Rejection of the Documentary Evidence at the Admission Stage, The Court Should Not Rush to Determine the Case
UNSWORN EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDE YEARS NEEDS CORROBORATION
UTILITY OF EXPERT EVIDENCE
UTHIBITISHO WA DENI
V
VARIANCE OF NAMES OF WITNESSES-FAILURE TO TENDER DEED POLL ON CHANGE OF NAMES
VERACITY OF EVIDENCE, PROSECUTION KEY WITNESS MAKING CONTRADICTIONS IN HIS EVIDENCE
Visual Identification Evidence, Dock Identification, The Lack of a Complainant in the Case, SIYOI WILSON NICODEMUS
VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE
Visual Identification, Ability to Name a Suspect at the Earliest Possible Time, Credibility of Witnesses, Uncertainty of the Verdict
Visual Identification, Credibility of Witnesses, Ability of A Witness to Name a Suspect, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age
VOIRE DIRE EXAMINATION
VOIRE DIRE,RETRIAL
W
WHAT FOLLOWS WHEN A WITNESSSTATEMENT IS FILED IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT
WHAT IS WITNESS STATEMENT
WHEN AN OATH IS SAID TO HAVE BEEN MADE
When Court Can Take Judicial Notice, Failure to Attach the Order of the High Court Refusing Leave to Appeal Cured by Overriding Objective,
WHERE IT WAS NECESSARY FOR THE SOCKS AND PAIR OF TROUSERS TO BE TENDERED AS EXHIBIT
WHERE THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT FAILS TO RE-EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE AND CONSIDER MATERIAL ISSUES INVOLED, THE COURT ON A SECOND APPEAL CAN STEP INTO THE SHOES TO RE-EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE
WHETHER A WITNESS STATEMENT CAN BE AMENDED BEFORE IT IS FORMALLY RECEIVED IN COURT
Who May Tender Exhibit, A Prosecutor Cannot Tender Exhibit, Broken Chain of Custody,
WHO MAY TESTIFY-EVERY PERSON SHALL BE COMPETENT TO TESTIFY
WITNES STEMENT HAS PRESCRIBED FORM
WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION STATING THAT THEY SMELLED BHANG, WHETHER THE STATEMENT BY THE WITNESS IS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT CONVICTION
WITNESS OF A TENDER AGE, NO CORROBORATED EVIDENCE, WHETHER CONVICTION MAY STAND ON EVIDENCE OF WITNESS OF TENDER AGE WITHOUT CORROBORATION
WITNESS OF TENDER AGE, NO VOIRE DIRE WHETHER THAT IS AN IRREGULARITY, SECTION 381(1) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
Y
Z