You need to login to view the following content . Please Login. Not a Member? Join Us
A
A CAUTIONED STATEMENT RECORDED BY THE POLICE OFFICER IN THE PRESENCE OF ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER OR OTHER PLOICE OFFICERS IS INADIMMISIBLE BY THE COURT
ASSESSMENT OF CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
ABILITY TO NAME THE SUSPECT AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY
A VERDICT MUST BE MADE IN CLEAR TERMS
ACQUITTAL AND WITHDRAWAL
AMENDMENT OF CHARGE , CURABLE DEFECTS, ALIBI, VISUAL ID, ID PARADE
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
AN OMMISSION IN THE CHARGE MAY BE CURED THE PARTICULARS OF THE CHARGE OR EVIDENCE ON RECORD
A CAUTIONED STATEMENT RECORDED BY THE POLICE OFFICER IN THE PRESENCE OF ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER OR OTHER PLOICE OFFICERS IS INADIMMISIBLE
A Clinical Officer Is a Qualified Medical Practitioner, Defence Case Must Be Considered, Best Evidence of Sexual Offence, Credibility of Witnesses
A CONFESSION OR CAUTIONED STATEMENT WILL BE PRESUMED TO HAVE BEEN VOLUNTARILY MADE UNTIL OBJECTION TO IT IS MADE
A CONVICTION FOR ARMED ROBBERY MAY BE ENETERED ON A CHARGE OF ROBEBERY SECTION 285 AND 286 OF THE PENAL CODE
A DECISION OF THE COURT MUST BE INFORMED BY EVIDENCE AND THE APPLICABLE LAW
A DOCUMENT MUST BE READ OUT AFTER ITS ADMISSION
A PROSECUTOR CANNOT TENDER EXHIBITS
A retrial may be ordered only when the original trial was illegal or defective
A SECOND APPELLATE COURT CANNOT INTEREFERE WITH THE CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF THE TWO COURTS BELOW EXCEPT FOR COMPELLING REASONS
A SECOND APPELLATE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF THE TWO COURTS BELOW EXCEPT FOR COMPELLING REASONS
A TRIAL WITHIN A TRIAL-PROCEDURE AT A TRIAL WITH ASSESSORS
A Witness with Interest to Serve, Variance Between the Charge and Evidence, Re-Evaluation of Evidence by the Second Appellate Court
Ability of A Witness to Name a Suspect, The Defence of Alibi, Best Evidence in Rape
Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect, Visual Identification Evidence, How and for What Reason the Accused Person is Arrested
ABSENCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SEIZURE-EMERGENCE SEARCH
ACCUSED CANNOT BE CONVICTED BASED I ON WIKNESS OF EVIDENCE BY PROSECUTION
Accused Must Make the Theme of His Defence, Rape Between Married People, Remote Possibilities in Favour of the Accused Cannot Benefit Him
Accused Person Must Plead to the Substituted Charge and Be Informed of His Right to Recall Witnesses, Retrial Principles
ADMISSION OF STATEMENTS OF APPELLANTS ON APPEAL WITHOUT HEARING THEM
AN ACCUSED CANNOT BE CONVICTED ON THE WEAKNESS OF THE DEFENCE
AN ACCUSED PERSON MUST INDICATE THE THEME OF HIS DEFENCE
An Accused Person Must Plead to The Amended Charge, Failure to Do So is Fatal, Retrial Principles
AN ACCUSED PERSON WHO CONFESSES TO A CRIME IS THE BEST WITNESS
AN APPLICATION FOR FORFEITURE ORDER-THE MANNER IN WHICH INTERESTED PARTIES MAY PURSUE REMEDIES IN APPLICATIONS FOR FORFEITURE
ANALYIS OF SMAPLE BY GOVEREMENT CHEMIST AS SOON AS PRACTICABL, WHETHER ONE MONTH AND A HALF IS A REASONABLE TIME OF DELAY
ANY FACT OR DOCUMENT OMMITTED OR AGREED DURING PRELIMINARY HEARING SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE DULY PROVED (1)
APPEAL AGAINST A CONVICTION BASED ON A PLEA OF GUILTY
APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION TO SUMMARY DISMIS AN APPEAL, OPTIONS OPEN TO THE SECOND APPELLATE COURT
APPEAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION
APPEAL LODGED AFTER CONVICTION BUT BEFORE SENTENCE IS PASSED, APPEAL PREMATURE
APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT FILED OUT OF THE PRESCRIBED LIMITATION PERIOD’
APPEALS BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY THE REGIONAL CRIME OFFICER
Appeals from the Subordinate Courts to the High Court in Criminal Matters, The Right to Be Heard, Conviction in Absentia
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT-AUTOMATIC EXCLUSION OF TIME REQUSITE FOR OBTAINING A COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS, JUDGEMENT OR ORDER APPEALED AGAINST
APPELANTS HAD A COMMON INTENTION OF ASSAUTING THE DECEASED BUT SENTENCED DIFFERENLY
APPELANTS WAS A LAST PERSON TO BE SEEN WITH THE DECEASED
APPELLANT CONDEMNED TO A SENTENCE HIGHER THAN THE LAW PROVIDED WHEN THE OFFENCE WAS COMMITTED, SENTENCE IMPOSED IS UNLAWFUL
APPELLANT CONVICTED IN OWN PLEA OF GUILTY OF MANSALUGHER WHILE THE FACTS NARRATED REVELED ACCIDENTAL KILLING, WHETHER THE APPELLANT WAS PROPERLY CONVICTED
APPELLANTS CONVICTED OF MURDER AND MANSLAUGTERS
APPELLANTS PRESENT AT THE SCENE OF THE KILING
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OUT OF TIME CIRCUSTANCES RELIED UPON NOT DISCLOSED
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, PERIOD OF LIMITATION FOR SUCH APPLICATION
APPLICATION OF LAW OF LIMITATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
APPROPRIATE SENTENCE TO IMPOSED FOR ACCUSED OF 16 YEARS
Arrested Person to Be Taken to Court Within 24 Hours, Circumstantial Evidence, The Offence of Rape and Incest by Male
B
BAIL IS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT-FAILURE TO GRANT BAIL AMOUNTS TO VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO BE HEARD-VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO BE HEARD RENDERS THE PROCEEDINGS AND JUDGEMENT TO BE NULLITY
BAIL=CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN GRANTING BAIL
BAIL=VARIATION OF THE BAIL CONDITIONS
Bail by subordinate Court which has been granted certificate of jurisdiction, Economic offence
BAIL FOR AN ACCUSED PERSON CHARGED WITH MURDER, APPLICANT OR ACCUSED PERSON A YOUNG PERSON, WHETHER BAIL MAY BE GRANTED SECTION 148(5) OF THE CPA
BAIL IN ECONOMIC OFFENCES WHERE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS UNCERTAIN AND THE CASE IS AT THE PRELIMINARY INQUIRY STAGE
BEFORE CHARGING A PRISONER, A POLICE OFFICER MUST HAVE AN HONEST BELIEF IN THE GULITY OF THE ACCUSED
BENEFIT OF DOUBTS -DOUBTS WHERE PRESENT BENEFIT THE ACCUSED PERSON
BEST EVIDENCE SEXUAL OFFENCES
Better Ten Guilty Persons Escape Than One Innocent Man Convicted, Easy to Allege Rape but Hard to Prove, Suspicion However Strong
BIAS, ALLEGATIONS OF BIAS AGAINST A JUDGE SUCH ALLEGATIONS NOT TO BE TAKEN LIGHTLY
Both the Accused Person and the Victim of Rape are Infected with Sexual Transmitted Diseases, Medical Evidence, Oral Confession, Expunged Evidence,
BRIBING IN ORDER TO FACILITATE PORT CLEARANCE OF A CONTAINER OF DANGEROUS DEUGS, WHETHER OFFENCE OF LEADING ORGANIZED CRIME ESTABLISHED
Broken Chain of Custody
C
CAUTION STATEMENTS, TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL, ASSESSORS
CAUTION STATEMENT
COMMENCEMENT OF CRIMINAL TRIAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT
CONSQUENCES OF FAILURE TO INDICATE IN THE RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS THAT PLEA WAS ENTERED
CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW
CIRCUMSTANCE ON WHICH THE APPELLATE COURT CAN INTERFERE FINDINGS OF THE BELLOW COURTS
CONVICTION BASED ON THE DOCTRINE OF RECENT POSSESSION
CONVICTION BASED ON A REPUDIATED CONFESSION, DEPARTING FROM COUNSEL CONTENTIONS, MEANING OF SHALL
CONVICTION BASED ON IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE OF A SINGLE WITNESS
CONVICTION BASED ON MOONLIGHT IDENTIFICATION, CHOICE OF WITNESS BY PROSECUTION
CONVICTION BASED ON MOONLIGHT IDENTIFICATION
CONVICTION BASED ON UNSWORN EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
CONVICTION MAY BE BASED ON UNCOROBORATED EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
CONVICTION MUST BE BASED ON EVIDENCE
COROBOROTIVE EVIDENCE MAY BE CIRCUMSTANTIAL
COURT CANT ADMIT NEW ASSERTION AT APPEAL
COURT IS NOT BOUND TO ACCEPT EXPERT OPINION
COURT WITH JURISDICTION TO GRANT BAIL IN COMMITAL PROCEEDING
CIRCUMSTANCES TO ESTABLISH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT-MOB JUSTICE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE ENTAILS RENDERING JUSTICE TO PARTIES-IT IS CRUCIAL TO THE STAKEHOLDERS TO HAVE A SENSE OF JUSTICE AND A SPIRIT OF COOPERTATION IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT JUSTICE IS AVAILED
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
CASE ADJORNED FOR A PERIOD RUNNING BEYOND 60 DAYS
CAUSITIONED STATEMENT, CAUTIONED STATEMENT AND RECORD OF AN INTERVIEW DISTINGUISHED
CAUTIONED AND ESTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMEMNTS MADE AND ADMITTED BY ACCUSED MUST BE INCOPORATED, SECTION 192(3) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
Cautioned Statement Recorded in the Presence of Other Police Officers is Inadmissible, Doubts Shall Be Dissolved in Favour of the Accused Person
CAUTIONED STATEMENT SHOULD BE READ OVER TO THE ACCUSED AFTER IT HAS BEEN RECORDED AND AFFORD HIM A CHANCE TO MAKE CORRECTION IF ANY FAILURE TO DO SO IS FITAL
CAUTIONED STATEMENT, ADMISSIBILITY OF THE EVIDENCE, MAY BE ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE WHEN VOLUNTARY MADE
Chain of Custody, Contents of a Judgement, Search Warrant, Failure to Consider the Defence Evidence, DPP Consent, DPP Certificate,
Chain of Custody, Contradictions in Evidence
Chain of Custody, Sentence Where a Person is Convicted with an Offence Which is Provided Under the EOCCA and Other Written Law, Independent Witness,
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
CHARGE ALLEGING AN OFFENCE AGAINST A STATUTORY PROVISION THAT DOES NOT EXIST, PROCEEDINGS NULL AND VOID
CHARGE NOT DISCLOSING ANY OFFENCE, WHETHER PROPER TO PUT CHARGE TO THE ACCUSED, SECTION 129 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
CHARGE OF ARMED ROBBERY, USE OF A TOY IN COMMITTING THE OFFENCE
CHARGED PREFFERED UNDER REPEALED LAW
CHARGES OF STEALING BY SERVANT FOLLOWED BY BEING IN POSSESSION OF PROPERTY UNLAWFULLY ACQUIRED
CHARGES OF STEALING BY SERVANT
CHARGES, OFFENCE CAPABLE OF BEING COMMITTED IN ALTERNATIVE WAYS, PROPER WAY OF CHARGING
Circumstances to Prove Malice Aforethought,
CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE AN APPELLATE COURT CAN INTERFERE WITH THE DISCREATION OF THE INFERIOR COURT OR TRIBUNAL
Circumstantial Evidence, Failure to Tender Physical Object, List of Intended Exhibits, Lies of Accused, Last Person to Be Seen With the Deceased,
CIRCUSTANCE OF SUBMISSION OF NO CASE TO ANSWER
CIRCUSTANCES OF A CONVICTION OF PLEA OF GUILTY
CIRCUSTANCES UNDER WHICH AN APPELLATE COURT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE SENTENCE OF THE TRIAL
CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FATS BY THE LOWER COURTS CANNOT BE INTENDERED -EXCEPTIONS-RATIONALE BEHIND
CONDITION OF ASSUANCE OF SERVICE OF THE RESPONDENT
Conditions for A Plea of Guilty to Be Valid for Purposes of Conviction Without Trial,
CONDITIONS FOR A PLEA OF GUILTY TO BE VALID FOR PURPOSES OF CONVICTION WITHOUT TRIAL
Conditions for determining the unequivocality of plea of guilty
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal, Court Should Refrain from Determining Substantive Issues,
CONDITIONS TO BE OBSERVED IN CONDUCTING AN IDENTIFICATION PARADE
CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO PROPERLY SUM UP OF THE CASE TO ASSESSORS
CONSIDERATION OF GRANT OR REFUSAL OF BAIL IN EXTRADITION CASES
Constructive Possession, Definition of Trafficking, Chain of Custody, The Doctrine of Recent Possession, Effect of Signing the Certificate of Seizure
CONTENTS OF A JUDGEMENT
CONTENTS OF EVERY CHARGE OR INFORMATION
Contradictions in Evidence, Failure to Tender Physical Object, Failure to Call a Material Witness, Credibility of Witnesses
CONVICTION OF MURDER BASING ON VARARIANCE OF EVIDENCE
COURT GRANTS BAIL AND SUBSEQUENTLY CANCELS IT WITHOUT REASONS FOR THE CANCELLATION, WHETHER PROPER
COURT MAY DISMISS ON APPEAL SUMMARILY AFTER IT HAS ALLOWED THE PARTIES TO ARGUE MAY DISMISS ON APPEAL SUMMARILY AFTER IT HAS ALLOWED THE PARTIES TO ARGUE THE APPEAL ON MERIT
COURT ON A SECOND APPEAL MAY INTERFERE WITH CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE COURTS BELOW
CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
Cruel Sentences Should Not Be Imposed to Persons of or Below of 18 Years, Confession, At Any Stage a Defective Charge Can Be Amended,
CURRENTLY IT IS NOT MANDATORY TO CONDUCT A CRIMINAL TRIAL WITH AID OF ASSESSORS
D
DUTY TO READ OVER THE CHARGE OR INFORMATION TO THE ACCUSED BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL
DEFENCE OF INSANITY
DNA TEST IN PROVING THE OFFENCE OF IMPREGNATING A SCHOOL GIRL
DUPLICITY OF CHARGES- A CHARGES IS DUPLEX WHERE IN ONE COUNT IT CONTAINS MORE THAN ONE OFFENCE
DEATH OF ACCUSED, ACCUSED PERSON DIES BEFORE COMPLETION OF THE CASE AGAINST HIM, WHAT THE COURT SHOULD DO
DEFECTIVE CHARGE FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY CITE THE RELEVANT SUB-SECTIONS IN THE STATEMENT OF THE OFFENCE
Defective Charge, Failure to Disclose to Whom the Threat Was Directed in The Particulars of Offence of Armed Robbery is Curable,
Defective Charge, Failure to Disclose to Whom the Threat Was Directed in The Particulars of Offence of Armed Robbery is Fatal,
Defective Charge, Failure to Draw a Memorandum of Matters Not Disputed, No Particular Number of Witnesses is Required to Prove a Fact,
DEFECTIVE CHARGE-CHARGING A PERSON UNDER NON-EXISTING PROVISIONS OF THE LAW
DEFENCE OF ALIB, FAILURE TO GIVE OF INTENETION TO PLEAD ALIBI, CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF INTENETION TO RELY UPON ALIBI
Defence of Alibi, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath, Sentence Start to Run When the Accused Person Was Convicted,
DEFENCE OF INSANITY
DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL DISCREATION’
DEFINITION OF THE TERM ORDER
DEFINITION OF THE WORD DOWRY
DEFINITION OF WORDS ARGUEMENT AND CONFRONTATION-THE TWO WORDS DO NOT IMPLY FIGHTING
Delay in Arresting the Accused Person, Sentence for Unnatural Offence, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences,
DELAY IN ARRESTING THE ACCUSED PERSON
Delay in Reporting a Crime, Contradictions in Evidence, Elements to Prove in Statutory Rape, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences, SELEMANI HASSANI
DELAY TACTICS-ONCE IS ACCIDENT, TWICE IS COINCIDENCE AND THRICE IS DELIBERATE
DELAY TO ARRAIGN THE ACCUSED PERSON IN COURT
Delay to Arrest the Accused Person, Failure to Call Material Witnesses, The Principle of Adverse Inference, Evidence of Recognition
DISCREATION OF HIGH COURT CAN INVOKE ITS DISCREATION SUO MOTU
Discripinary vs penal offences
DISMISSEDE SUMMARILY BY THE HIGH COURT
DISPENSING WITH PRESENCE OF ACCUSED, WHEN A STATEMENT OF ACCUSED PERSON SHOULD BE READ OUT
DISPOSAL OF EXHIBITS AFTER CLOSING PROSECUTION CASE, EFFECT THEREOF, SECTION 353(1) OF THE RIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
DOCRINE OF RECENT POSSESSION
DPP Certificate and Consent for The Subordinate Court to Try Economic Case, Certificate and Consent Issued Prior to the Initiation of a Charge is Void, OMARY BAKARI
DPP’s CONSENT AND CERTIFICATE CONFERRING JURISDICTION ON THE SUBORDINATE COURT TO TRY THE ECONOMIC CASE
DUPLICITY OF CHARGES-THE LAW FORBIDING LUMPING OF MORE THAN ONE OFFENCE IN ONE COUNT
Duty of The Prosecution to Prove the Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Definition of The Term Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Visual Identification
Duty to Assign Reasons for Taking Over the Case from the Predecessor Magistrate, Corroboration in Sexual Offences
Duty to Give Reasons for Taking Over the Case, Contradictions in Evidence, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences
Duty to Lead Evidence Showing the Date the Offence was Committed, Adverse Inference, Witness Should Identify the Stolen Property
ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZED CRIME, SUBORDINATE COURTS HAVE NO JURISDICTION EXCEPT BY AN ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS OR AUTHORIZED STATE ATTORNEY
Economic Case Must be Heard by Subordinate Court Specified in the DPP Certificate, Accused to be Present When Perishable Exhibits are to Be Destroyed,
Effect of Charging a Person Under a Repealed Law, Dead Law, Failure to Cite the Proper and Valid Law
Elements to Prove Murder, Eye Witness Visual Identification, Evidence of Recognition, Adverse Inference, Identification Where Victims Are Terrified
EVERY CHARGE ORINFORMATION MUST CONTAIN SUFFICINT PARTICULARS AS MAY BE NECCESSARY FOR GIVING REASONABLE INFORMATION AS TO THE NATURE OF THE OFFENCE CHARGED S.132 & 135 OF THE CPA
EVERY DEFECT IN THE CHARGE RENDERS IT FATALLY DEFECTIVE
EVERY PROCEDURAL ERROR CAN VITIATE THE PROCEEDINGS
EVIDENCE MUST BE GIVEN UNDER OATH OR AFFIRMATION
EVIDENCE OF RECOGNITION
Evidence of Visual Identification, Evidence of Voice Identification, Sentence for Unnatural Offence Committed to a Child is Life
EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL DISCREATION, REQUIREMENTS FOR EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL DISCREATION
EXERCISE OF REVIEW POWERS BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, CIRCUSTANCES UNDER WHICH THE POWERS MAY BE INVOKED
EXTENDED JURISDICTION
EXTRADITION, MINISTER’S ORDER TO COURT FOR ARREST AND DETENTION OF FUGITIVE COURT COMPLIANCE WITH MINISTERS ORDER, WHETHER LAWFUL SECTION 5(1) OF EXTRADITION ACT
EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENT-CHIEF JUSTICE GUIDELINES
E
EFFECT OF DELAY IN NAMING THE SUSPECTS
EQUIVOCAL TESTIMONIES CAN NOT FORM CONVICTION
EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENT MAY FORM CONVICTION
F
FAILURE TO READ THE CHARGE SHEET BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT TRIAL
FUCTUS OFFICIO
FUNCTUS OFFICIO
FUNCTION OF ARRAIGNMENT
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN ASCERTAINING PROPER IDENTIFICATION
FACTORS IN IDENTIFICATION BY RECOGNITION
FAILURE TO READ IDENTIFICATION PARADE REGISTERS
FAILURE TO READ OUT THE CONTENTS OF A DOCUMENT AFTER ITS ADMISSION IN EVIDENCE IS AN INCURRABLE IRREGULARITY
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN IMPOSING SENTENCE
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN IMPOSING SENTENCE
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN IMPOSING SENTENCE
FAILURE TO CONDUCT PH CANT VITIATE THE PROCEEDINGS
FAILURE TO SUMMON KEY WITNESS WEAKEN THE PROSECUTION CAS
FAILURE TO CONSIDER GROUNDS OF APPEAL
FAILURE TO DISCLOSE IN THE CHARGE THE ACTUAL TIME IN WHICH THE OFFENCE WAS COMMITTED
FAILURE TO CONSIDER DEFENCE CASE
FAILURE TO TENDER EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENT
Factors to Establish Malice Aforethought, Self Defence
Failure by the Accused to indicate his defence earlier, it render the defence to be dismissed
FAILURE BY THE FIRST APPELATE COURT TO CONSIDER THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL
FAILURE BY THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE TO SIGN THE CERTIFICATE OF SEIZURE
FAILURE BY THE TRIAL COURT TO STATE THE PROVISION UNDER WHICH THE ACCUSEDIS CONVICTEDAT THE TIME OF CONVICTION
FAILURE BY THE TRIAL COURT TO STATE THEPROVISION UNDER WHICH THE ACCUSED IS CONVICTED AT THE TIME OF CONVICTION
Failure by the Trial Judge to Append Signature at the End of the Testimony of Each Witness is Fatal, Failure to Append Signature
FAILURE OF THE TRIAL MAGISTRATE TO INDICATE THE CLOSURE OF THE DEFENCE CASE
FAILURE OF TRIAL JUDGE TO SUM UP THE CASE TO THE ASSESORS BEFORE OBTAINING THEIR OPINION, EFFECT OF SUCH FAILURE
Failure to Append Signature in The Proceedings, Particulars of The Offence of Piracy
Failure to Arraign the Accused Person Before the Trial is Fatal, Retrial Principles,
FAILURE TO CAUSION THE ACCUSED ON A SPECIFIC OFFENCE AND FAILURE TO INDICATE THE OFFENCE SECTION IN THE CAUSIONED STATEMENT
FAILURE TO CITE THE PUNISHMENT PROVISION IN THE CHARGE IS NOT FATAL
Failure to Consider Defence Case, Failure to Furnish the Accused Person with The Statement of the Complainant, Credibility of Witnesses
FAILURE TO CONSIDER DEFENCE CASE
Failure to Consider Mitigating Factors, Evidence of Recognition, Visual Identification, Defence of Alibi, Necessity to Describe Time in the Charge
Failure to Consider the Defence Case, Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases, Credibility of Witnesses, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences
FAILURE TO CONSIDER THE DEFENCE CASE
Failure to Enter a Conviction Order Against the Accused Person
Failure to Establish Boundaries in Wildlife Offences, Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission, Concurrent Findings of Facts by The Lower Courts
FAILURE TO HOLD A PRELIMINARY HEARING VIOLATES PROCEEDINGS IN A CASE SECTION 192
FAILURE TO READ EXIHIBIT AFTER ADMITTED IS INCURRABLE DEFECT
Failure to Read Out the Undisputed Facts of the Case to the Accused Person During PH and Cause the Same to Be Signed by Him is Not Fatal
FAILURE TO RE-ISSUE CONSENT AND CERTIFICATE CONFERING JURISDICTION RENDER TRIAL NULLITY
FAILURE TO STATE IN THE CHARGE THE TIME THE OFFENCE WAS COMMITTED
failure to take oath by victim is curable
FAILURE TO TAKE PLEA OF THE ACCUSED PERSON IS AGAINST A RULE OF NATURAL JUSTICE
FAIR TRIAL MINIMUM STANDARDS TO ENSURE A FAIR TRIAL
FIRST OFFENNDER DESERVE A STATUTORY MINIMUM SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT
Forgery of academic certificates
Forgery, Occasioning Loss to a Specified Authority, Deceive and Defraud, Evidence of Handwriting, Contradictions in Evidence
GROUNDS FOR DELAY FOR APPLICATION FOR LODGEING REVIEW
Guidelines On Visual Identification, Defence of Alibi, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect, Sentences Must Be Served at The Same Time
G
H
HOW SHOULD CRIMINAL JUSTICE BE ADMINISTERED
HOW PANEL OF THREE JUDGES OF CAT DECIDE A JUDGMENT
HE WHO ALLEGES MUST PROVE-STANDARD OF PROOF IN AN APPLCATION FOR FOEFEITURE ORDER-BALANCE OF PROBALITIES-S.75 OF THE POCA
HEARING A CASE AFTER EXPIRY OF 60 DAYS
HIGH COURT IS ENJOINED TO PREVENT IT UNDER S.95 OF THE CPC
I
IDENTIFICATION OF DOGS AT NIGH, NEED TO ADDUCE EVIDENCE TO SHOW WHETHER CONDITIONS ALLOWED FOR PROPER IDENTIFICATION
IDENTIFICATION PARADE, ACCUSED IDENTIFIED BY TWO WITNESSES AND INDENTIFICATION BY ONE WITNESS IS CHALLENGED, WHETHER ACCUSED PERSONS PROPERLY INDENTIFIED
Identification Parade, Requirement of Giving Description of the Suspect, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect, Elements of Armed Robbery
IDENTIFICATION PARADE
IDENTIFICATION, CASE DEPENDING ON IDENTIFICATION OF ACCUSED, SUCH IDENTIFICATION MUST BE WATERTIGHT
ILLEGAL IMPORTATION OF DANGERIOUS DRUGS, CIRCUSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHETHER THE OFFENCE IS ESTABLISHED
ILLEGALITY AS A GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CAN BE RAISED BY COURT SUO MOTU
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Discretion of The High Court to Grant Extension of Time,
Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time, Prison Status of a Person as a Ground for Extension of Time
IMPORTANCE OF A PROPER SUMMING UP OF A CASE TO ASSESSORS
IMPROPER SUMMING UP TO ASSESSORS AND VISUAL IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
Improper Summing Up to Assessors, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court is No Longer Mandatory
Improper Summing Up to Assessors, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court
Improper Summing Up to Assessors, Retrial Principles
IMPROPER SUMMING UP TO ASSESSORS
IN EVERY PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY THE CRUCIAL QUESTION IS WHETHER IT HAS OCCASSIONED A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
Ingredients of armed robbery
INSANITY AS A BAR TO A TRIAL, PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED BY TRIAL COURT
INTERFERENCE WITH THE DISCREATION OF THE LOWER COURTS
Interference with The Exercise of Discretion by The Lower Courts, Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time, Contents of The Memorandum of Appeal
INTERFERENCE WITH THE SENTENCING DISCREATION OF THE TRIAL COURT
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE SHALL BE LIABLE TO
INVOLMENT OF ASSESSORS IN CRIMINAL TRIALSBEFORE THE HIGH COURT-THE ROLE OF ASSESORS
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, Accused Must be Given an Opportunity to Comment on the Selected Assessors
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, Duty to Inform the Assessors Their Responsibility, Retrial Principles
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, Retrial Principles
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, The Trial Judge Should Not Add Extraneous Matters
Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, The Trial Judge Should Not Add Extraneous Matters
INVOLVEMENT OF ASSESSORS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS BEFORE THE HIGH COURT-OPINION OF ASSESORS
It is Highly Improbable for One to Commit an Offence Without Hiding His Identity, Adverse Inference, Defense of Alibi, Visual Identification
IT IS IRREGULAR TO CHARGE A PERSON WITH THE OFFENCE OF ARMED ROBBERY AND CAUSING GRIEVOUS HARM AS SEPARATE COUNTS IN THE SAME CHARGE
It is No Longer Mandatory to Conduct a Criminal Trial with the Aid of Assessors, Improper Summing Up to Assessors, Retrial Principles
It is Not Mandatory to Report Every Crime to the Local Leadership Before the Complaint is Formally Made to the Police, Proof of Victim Age,
IT IS THE CHOICE OF THE DPP TO CHARGE A SUSPECT WITH ONLY THE OFFENCES THAT SHE HAS ABILITY TO PROVE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
J
JURISDICTION OF ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZED CRIME COURT ON TERRORISM OFFENCE
JUDGEMENT DOES NOT MEET THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS, JUDGEMENT BAD IN LAW
JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT MUST BE BASED ON AN OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE EVIDENCE OF BOTH THE PROSECUTION AND DEFENCE
JUDICIAL DECISIONS WHICH ESTABLISH PRECEDENT HAVE RESTRORESPECTIVE EFFECT IN THE CASES BEING DECIDED AND OTHER CASES WHICH ARE PENDING OR STILL TO COME BEFORE THE COURT
Jurisdiction to Try Economic Cases, DPP Certificate and Consent Must Refer to Section Which is Cited in the Charge Sheet
K
L
LIES OF AN ACCUSED MAY CORROBORATE THE PROSECUTION CASE
LEADING ORGANIZED CRIME, NO PROOF OF INTENT TO BENEFIT FROM SUCH ACT, WHETHER OFFENCE OF LEADING ORGANIZED CRIME IS ESTABLISHED
LEGAL AID SERVICES TO INDIGENT ACCUSED PERSONS FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES-THE LAW BEFORE AND AFTER 2017
Lost File, Missing Record, Way Forward When Court is Faced with Missing Record
M
MISSING CHARGE-EFFECT OF THE CHARGE MISSING FROM THE RECORD OF APPEAL
MURDER CASE=PERSON TAKEN INTO CUSTODY WITHOUT WARRANT
MEANING OF AN ORDER FOR RETRIAL
Magistrate Has to Append His Signature After Recording Evidence of Each Witness, Ability of a Witness to Name a Suspect, Retrial Principles
MATTER NOT RAISED IN FIRST APPEAL
MATTER NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEAL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATE COURT EXCEPT THOSE INVLOVING POINTS OF LAW (NOT FACTS)
MATTER NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEAL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATE COURT EXCEPT THOSE INVLOVING POINTS OF LAW
MATTER NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATE COURT EXCEPT THOSE INVOLVING POINTS OF LAW
MATTERS NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEAL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATE COURT EXCEPT THOSE INVLOVING POINTS OF LAW (NOT FACTS)
MATTERS NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEAL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATE COURT EXCEPT THOSE INVLOVING POINTS OF LAW
MATTERS NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL AND FIRST APPEAL CANNOT BE RAISED IN A SECOND APPELLATECOURT EXCEPT THOSE INVLOVING POINTS OF LAW (NOT FACTS)
MATTERS NOT RAISED IN THE TRIAL COURT OR FIRST APPELLATE COURT CANNOT BE RAISED IN THE SECOND APPELLATE COURT
MEANING OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY
MEANING OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION
MEETING CONVENED TO DISCUSS AND WRITE A LETTER TO THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER ON MISMANAGEMENT OF VILLAGE FUNDS, WHETHER THE MEETINGS AND WRITTING OF THE LETTER AMOUNTED TO ACRIMINAL OFFENCE
MINIMUM SENTENCE, FIRST OFFENDER SENTENCE UNDER MINIMUM SENTENCE DECREE
MIS REDECTION AND NON DIRECTION, EFFECT THEREOF
MODALITY OF SUPPLYING THE COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS TO THE ACCUSED
MODE OF FRAMING THE CHARGE-THE PUNISHMENT PROVISION MUST BE STATED IN THE CHARGE-RATIONALE
N
NEW MATTER RAISED AT THE SECOND APPEAL
NEED TO EVALUATE EVIDENCE LAID IN THE SCALES AT THE TRIAL AND ASSIGNING REASONS FOR DECISIONS MADE
NO PARTICULAR NUMBER OF WITNESSES IS REQUIRED TO PROVE A CASE-WHAT MATTERS IS NOT THE NUMBER OF WITNESSES BUT THE QUALITY AND RELEVANCY OF THE EVIDENCE OF WITNESSES GIVE
NO PARTICULAR NUMBER OF WITNESSSES IS REQUIRED TO PROVE A FACT
NO PROSECUTION TESTIFIED TO HAVE SEEN THE APPELLANTS KILL THE DECEASED
NON CITATION OR WRONG CITATIONOF THE PROVISION IN THE STATEMENT OF THE OFFENCE
Non Inclusion of the Charge in the Record of Appeal, The Charge Sheet is Mandatorily Required to Be Included in the Record of Appeal
NON-CITATION AND CITATIONS OF INAPPLICABLE PROVISIONS IN THE STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
NOT ONLY WRONG AND NON-CITATION OD THE RELEVANT PROVISION OF LAW IN THE STATEMENT OF THE OFFENCE BUT ALSO FOR THE INSUFFICIENCY OF THE PARTCULARS OF THE CHARGE
O
ORDER FOR RETRIAL WHEN A DETECTED ERROR ON AN APPEAL HAS BEEN HELD TO BE FATAL
OFFENCE COMMITTED BEFORE THE ENEACTMENT OF THE SEXUAL OFFENCES
ORDER OF FORFEITURE, WHETHER COURT CAN ORDER DISTRIBUTION OF FOREFITED PROPERTY TO BENEFICIARIES
P
POWERS TO ORDER A RETRIAL
PROOF OF DEATH OR CAUSE OF DEATH
PROCEDURE OF RECEIVING EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
PURPOSE OF HOLDING IDENTIFICATION PARADE
POSITIVE EVIDENCE, CONVICTION BASED ON VISUAL OF MOONLIGHT, EVIDENCE OF COUPLES
PROCEDURES WHEN AN ACCUSED PLEADED GUILTY TO AN OFFENCE CHARGED
PLACE OF INQUIRY AND TRIAL PLACE OF SUING THE ACCUSED PERSON
PARTICULARS IN THE OFFENCE OF PIRACY
PARTICULARS OF CHAGRE NOT DISCOSING AN ESSENTIAL ELELMENTS OF THE OFFENCE CHARGED, CHARGE INCURABLY DEFECTIVE
PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THEIR OWN PLEADINGS AND NO PARTY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DEPART FROM HIS PLEADINGS
PENALTY FOR UNNATURAL OFFENCE COMMITTED TO A GIRL OF BELOW 18 YEARS OLD
PERSON CHARGED WITH BEING IN POSSESSION OF PROPERTY SUSPECTED OF HAVING BEEN UNLAWFULLY ACQUIRED IN ONE COUNT AND RELATING STOLEN PROPERTY IN ANOTHER COURT
Plea of Guilty is Followed by Conviction, Plea of Guilty Must Be Unequivocal, Proof of Victim Age, Sanctity of The Court Record
PLEA OF GUILTY MUST BE AN UNEQUIVOCAL -CLEAR
Plea of Guilty Must be Unequivocal, The Response Ni Kweli Nilimpa Mimba is Incomplete,
PLEA OF GUILTY MUST BE UNEQUIVOCAL
PLEA OF GUILTY MUST BE UNEQUIVOCAL-THE FACTS ADDUCED AFTER RECORDING A PLEA OF GUILTYSHOULD DISCLOSE AND ESTABLISHALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENCE CHARGED
PLEA OF GUILTY, UNEQUIVOCAL PLEA OF GUILTY, APPELLANT PLEADED GUILTY WHILE STILL IN CONFUSED STATE OF MIND AFTER BEATING
PLEA OF GUILTY, WHETHER THE PLEA WAS EQUIVOCAL
PLEA, CHANGE OF PLEA, ACCUSED PLEADED GUILTY AND THEN REQUESTS TO CHARGE PLEA, WHETHER THE COURT MAY REJECT THE REQUEST
Post-Mortem Report is Not the Only Proof of Death, Commencing The Trial Without Re-Reading the Charge Sheet
POWER OF HIGH COURT IN SUMMARY DISMISSAL
POWER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL ON A SECOND APPEAL
POWER OF THE COURT TO SUBSTITUTE LESSER OFFENCE
POWEWR OF REVISION TO RECTIFY ERRORS
PRAYERS HAS BEEN OVERTAKEN BY EVENTS NOT NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE APPEAL
PRELIMINARY HEARING IS AIMED TO DETERMINE MATTERS NOT IN DISPUTE
Preliminary Hearing is Not Part of the Trial, The Principle of Adverse Inference, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age,
PRELIMINARY HEARING, ADMISSION OF A RETRACTED CAUTIONED STATEMENT AND OTHER DISPUTED ITEMS AS EXHIBITS DURING PRELIMINARY HEARING, WHETHER PROCEDURE WAS PROPER
PRELIMINARY HEARING, SECTION 192(3) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, CONTENTS OF MEMORANDUM OF MATTERS AGREED NOT READ OVER AND EXPLAINED TO ACCUSED, EFFECT THEREOF, SECTION 192(3) OF THE CRIMINAL
PRELIMINARY HEARING
PRINCIPLE OF ADVERSE INFERENCE
Principle of Constructive Possession, Informer is Protected, Sentence for a Person Convicted of Economic Offence
Principles Governing Reliability of the Circumstantial Evidence, Failure to Raise an Objection During the Admission of Exhibits, Best Witness in Criminal
PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS, PRINCIPLES GOVERNING PRIVATE
Procedure in Trials Before the High Court, Arraignment of an Accused Is Not Complete Until He Has Pleaded, Retrial Principle
PROCEDURE IN TRIALS BEFORE THE HIGH COURT
Procedure of Plea Taking at the Subordinate Courts, Plea of Guilty, Definition of A Prohibited Plant, Matters Not Riased
PROOF BEYOUND REASONABLE DOUBT
Proof of Accused Age, A Trial Within a Trial, Failure to Cross Examine a Witness, The Sentence for Rape Committed by a Person Who is Under 18 Years,
Proof of Rape, Failure to Cross Examine a Witness, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, A Document Must Be Read Out After Its Admission,
Proof of The Victim Age, Contradictions in Evidence, Penalty for Unnatural Offence Committed to A Child Under 18 Years,
Proof of the Victim Age, Two Schools of Thought
Provisions of The DCEA Relating to Search and Seizure are Subject to CPA, List of Intended Exhibits, A Charge Must Contain Sufficient Particulars
Provisions of the Law in Respect of Search and Seizure, Broken Chain of Custody, Identification of a Suspect at the Public Area
PUNISHMENT FOR IMPREGNATING A SCHOOL GIRL
Punishment Provision for The Offence of Rape, Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age,
Rape is an Accusation Which is Easily Made, Hard to Be Proved and Harder to Be Defended by the Party Accused, Though Never So Innocent,
Reasons for Amendment of the Charge, Identification Parade, Evidence of Visual Identification,
REASONS FOR TAKING OVER THE CASE
RECALLING OF A WITNESS ON ACCUSED’S DEMAND, WHETHER MAGISTRATE HAS DISCREATION TO REFUSE SECTION 214(2)(a) of CPA
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age,
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath or Affirmation, Hearsay Evidence,
Reception of Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, The Right to Be Heard,
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE OF A CHILD OF TENDER AGE
Reception of The Evidence of a Child of Tender Age, Accused Cannot Be Convicted On the Weakness of His Defence
RECORDING CAUTIONED STATEMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF OTHER POLICE OFFICERS IN THE SAME ROOM IS FATAL
RECORDING OF EVIDENCE, TRIAL MAGISTRATE FAILED TO SIGN THE EVIDENCE OF EVERY WITNESS CONTRARY TO SECTION 210(1) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, WHETHER THE FAILURE IS CURABLE, SECTION 388 OF THE C
Released After Being Remanded by MATUMA, J for Disobedience of Court Orders,
REPRESENTATION, TRIAL CONTINUED WHILE SOME OF THE ACCUSED WERE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, WHETHER IT WAS PROPER FOR TRIAL TO CONTINUE
REQUIREMENT TO READ OVER THE CHARGE TO THE ACCUSED IN A LANGUAGE HE WILL UNDERSTANDS FOR HIM TO PLEAD
RESTITUTION OF PROPERTY IN REVISIONAL PROCEEDINGS, SECTION 253(3) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
RESTRIAL PRINCIPLES
RETRIAL IDENTIFICATION
RETRIAL NOT TO BE ORDERED WHERE IT IS LIKELY TO CAUSE INJUNCTICE TO THE ACCUSED
RETRIAL PRINCIPLES
REVISIONAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL SECTION 4 OF THE AJA
REVISIONAL PROCEEDINGS, RIGHT OF CONVICT TO BE HEARD
RIDING TWO HORSES AT THE SAME TIME IS AN ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS
RIGHT OF ACCUSED TO CROSS EXAMINE THE WITNESS IN NEW CHARGE
RIGHT OF ACCUSED TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION, ACCUSED SHOWED INTENTION TO BE REPRESENTED SECTION 310 OF CPA
RULES OF STATURY INTERPRENTATION
Q
R
RETRIAL AGAINST THE ACQUITTED ACCUSED PERSON- AUTRFOIS ACQUIT AND ISSUE ESTOPPEL
REVISIONAL POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT
S
SCOPE OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE LAW OF THE CHILD
SUBSTITUTION OF CONVICTION
STEPS TO BE FOLLOWED IN ORDER TO CONDUCT PRELIMINARY HEARING-CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILURE TO CONDUCT PRELIMINARY HEARING
SANCITY OF THE COURT RECORD- THERE IS ALWAYS A PRESUMPTION THAT A COURT RECORD ACCURATELY REPRESENTS WHAT HAPPENED
SEARCH CONDUCTED WITHOUT WARRANT-ILLEGAL SEARCH
SECTION 21(1) (a) (2) OF THE NPA DOES NOT CREATE THE OFFENCE OF UNLAWFUL ENTRY INTO A GAME RESERVE
SECURITY TO APPEAR IN THE COURT OF APPEQAL
Selection of Assessors, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, Improper Summing Up to Assessors,
Selection of Assessors, Involvement of Assessors in Criminal Trials Before the High Court, Improper Summing Up to Assessors
SENTENCE FOR FORGERY OF CHEQUES AND UTTERING THE FALSE DOCUMENTS
SENTENCE FOR FORGERY OF THE BANK STATEMENTS AND OBTAINING MONEY BY FALSE PRETENCE
SENTENCE FOR MANSLAUGHTER , APPELLANT SENTENCED TO SEVEN YEARS IMPRISONMENT, WHETHER THE SENTENCE IS PROPER
SENTENCE FOR RAPE
SENTENCE FOR UNATURAL OFFENCE
SENTENCE OF ARMED ROBBERY
SENTENCE OF THITY YEARS IMPRISONMENT WHERE ACCUSED PLEADED GUILTY TO THE OFFENCE OF MANSALUGHTER, WHETHER THE SENTENCE IMPOSED WAS EXCESSIVE
SENTENCE OF TWENTY YEARS IMPRISONMENT WHERE ACCUSED PLEADED GUILTY TO THE OFFENCE OF MANSLAUGHTER, WAS OUTRAGOUSLY PROVED BY MISCONDUCT OF HIS INFIDEL SPOUSE, WHETHER SENTENCE IMPOSED WAS EXESSIV
T
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLEA TAKEN DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING WITH THE ONE TAKEN BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF TRIAL
THE MANNER HOW CREDIBILITY CAN BE DETERMINED
TYPES OF IDENTIFICATION
TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL, CONVICTION BASED ON SUSPICION, ASSESSORS, IDENTIFICATION
THE CASE TO BE PRIMA FACIE MUST BE SUCH THAT A REASONABLE TRIBUNAL PROPERLY DIRECTING ITS MIND TO THE LAW AND THE EVIDENCE CAN CONVICT IF NO EXPLANATION IS OFFERED BY THE DEFENCE
THE REQUIREMENT OF DNA TEST TO PROVE SEXUAL OFFENSES
THE TYPES OF IDENTIFICATION
THE SENTENCING-THE DEATH OCCURRING IN THE COURSE OF CHASTISEMENT BY A GUARDIAN IS categorized A LOW LEVEL
THE SIGN @ STANDS FOR “ALIAS” WHICH MEANS ALTERNATIVE IDENTITY OR ALSO KNOWN AS (“A.K.A)
THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL-THE RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINE- THE RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED TO CROSS EXAMINE CO-ACCUSED-THE RIGHT OF ACCUSED PERSONS TO CROSS EXAMINE EACH OTHER
THE DUTY OF EXPERTS-EXPERTS OPINION CANNOT BE EASY IGNORED, REASONS MUST BE GIVEN
THAT THE INTENDED APPEAL HAS OVERWHELMING CANCES OF SUCESS IS NO LONGER A GOOD CAUSE FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
THE ABILITY OF A WITNESS TO NAME A SUSPECT AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY IS AN ALL-IMPORTANT ASSURANCE OF HIS REALIBILITY
THE ACCUSED PERSON MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS OF ORDERING DESTRUCTION OF THE EXHIBIT
THE ACCUSED PERSON MUST PLEAD TO THE SUSBSITUTED CHARGE AND BE INFORMED OF HIS RIGHT TO RECALL WITNESS
THE ACCUSED PERSON MUST PLEAD TO THE SUSBSITUTED CHARGE AND BE INFORMED OF HIS RIGHT TO RECALL WITNESS
THE APPELLANT CHARGED WITH THE OFFENCE OF MURDER, PLEADED GUILTY TO THE LESSER OFFENCE OF MANSLAUGHTER AFTER CONVICTION THE COURT SENTENCED HIM TO IMPRISONMENT FOR TWENTY YEARS.
THE APPLICABILITY OF DOCTRINE OF ESTOPEL IN CRIMINAL TRIALS IN TANZANIA
The Claim of Being Impotent, Sentence for Unnatural Offence Committed to A Child Under 18 Years is Life Imprisonment,
The Consent and Certificate of the DPP Conferring Jurisdiction Upon the Court to Try Economic Case
The Consent and Certificate of the DPP Must Be Endorsed by the Subordinate Court, Retrial Principles,
THE COURT CANNOT EXERCISE ITS REVISIONAL POWERS WHILE HEARING AN APPEAL WHICH IS TIME BARRED
The Court Must Consider Mitigation Factors to the First Offenders During Passing the Sentence
THE COURT OF APPEAL AS A SECOND APPELLATE COURT IS MANADATED TO DEAL WITH MATTERS OF LAW ONLY BUT NOT MATTERS OF FACT
The Credibility of Witnesses, There is No Lawful Sexual Intercourse with a Girl Who is Under 18 Years, Penetration However Slight Is Sufficient
THE DEFENCE OF ALIBI
The Defence of Insanity, Circumstances Where Insanity May Be Raised, Retrial Principles,
THE DETENTION OF ARRESTED PERSONSTAKING THE ACCUSED PERSON TO COURT BEYOND 24 HRSAFTER HIS ARREST
The Doctrine of Recent Possession, Sanctity of Court Record,
The Doctrine of Recent Possession, The Offence of Burglary and Stealing
THE DPP’S RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL IS LIMITED TO SENTENCE OR ACQUITTAL-DPP HAS BEEN BARRED TO APPEAL AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS OF THE COURT IN CRIMINAL CASES
The Essence of the Offence of Rape is Penetration, Penetration However Slight is Sufficient, Effect of Lack of Medical Evidence in Proving Rape
THE EXAMINATION AND WEIGHTING OF NARCOTIC DRUGS IS AN EXPERTISE WHICH IS THE DOMAIN OF THE GOVERMENT CHEMIST
THE FACT THAT A CRIME REMAINS UNDETECTED FOR A LONG TIME, CANNOT IN ITSELF MEAN THAT THE CULPRIT SHOULD GO SCOT-FREE EVEN AFTER DETECTING THE IT
THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IS ENTILED TO RE-EVALUATE THE ENTIRE EVIDENCE ON RECORD AN MAY COME OUT WITH ITS OWN FINDINGS-RULE 36(1) OF THE TCAR
THE IMPORTANCE OF SECURING A SEARCH WARRANT BEFORE SEARCH-PURPOSE OF THE POLICE GENERAL ORDERS
THE INVOLVEMENT OF ASSESSORS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS BEFORE THE HIGH COURT-SUMMINGUP TO ASSESSORS
The Law Governing Extended Jurisdiction, Definition Order
THE LAW OR ACT COMES INTO OPERATION ON THE DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE GAZETTE EXCEPT IF THE LAW PROVIDES OTHERWISE HOWEVER, WHERE SUCH CHANGES AFFECTS PROCEDURE ONLY, IT CAN OPERATE RESTROSPEC
THE MODE OF CHARGING OFFENCES
THE MODE OF FRAMING THE CHARGE
THE MODES OF CHARGING OFFENCES-DRAFTING OF A CHARGE
THE PARTIES WHO HAVE THE ERVICES OF AN ADVOCATE AT THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL, THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BRING TO THE COURTS ATTENTION TO THEIR GROUNDS OF APPEAL
The Police Powers of Search and Seizure, Illegal Search, Conditions for Admission of Illegally Obtained Evidence
The Position of the Law on Search and Seizure, Illegal Search
The Position of the Law Regarding Failure to Prevent a Crime, Definition Gang Rape is the Rape of One Person by a Group of Other People
THE PRE-CONVICTION PERIOD MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS A MITIGATING FACTOR BUT IT CANNOT BE COUNTED AS EQUIVALENT TO TIME SERVED AS AN IMPRISONMENT TERM
THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIR TRIAL-JUSTICE SHOULD NOT ONLY BE DONE BUT IT MUST ALSO BE SEEN TO BE DONE
THE PROCEDURE OF PLEA TAKING AT THE SUBORDINATE COURTS
The Provision of the Interpreter to the Accused Who Does Not Understand the Evidence Given in a Language Not Understood by Him
THE PROVISIONS OF THE DRUGS CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT ACT (DCEA) RELATING TO SEARCH AND SEIZURE WERE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE THE CPA BUT RATHER SUBJECT THEM TO THE CPA
The Punishment Provision Must Be Stated in the Charge, The Mode of Framing the Charge, Amendment of the Charge
The Requirement for the Appellate Court to Consider All Grounds of Appeal, The Charge is the Foundation of Criminal Trial
THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE ACCUSED PERSON BE REMINDED THE CHARGE BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCE
THE REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT IN CAMERA ALL TRIALS INVLOVING SEXUAL OFFENCES
The Requirement to File the Notice of Intention to Appeal Within Ten Days
THE REQUIREMENT TO READ OUT THE DOCUMENTS DURING COMMITTAL PROCEEDING
THE REQUIREMENT TO READ OUT THE WITNESS TESTIMONONIES TO THE WITNESSES AFTER THEY HAD TESTIFIED
THE REQUIREMENT TO READ OUT THE WITNESSES TESTIMONIES TO THE WITNESSES AFTER THEY HAD TESTIFIED S.210 (3) OF CPA-EFFECT ON NON COMLIANCE
The Right to Defend the Case, The Right to Be Heard, Failure to Grant a Prayer for Adjournment of a Case
The Right to Legal Representation, A Person in Need of Legal Aid Service Has a Duty Apply for Legal Aid, Credibility of Witnesses
The Right to Legal Representation, Trial Relating to Sexual Offences Should Be Conducted in Camera, Proof of Victim Age, Credibility of Witnesses
THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION IS NOT AUTOMATIC-THE PERSON IN NEED OF SUCH SERVICE HAS A DUTY TO ENGAGE AN ADVOCATE OR REPLY FOR LEGAL AID
The Rules of Court Must Be Obeyed, The Requirement to Account for Each Day of Delay, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown
THE SECOND APPELLATE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF THE TWO COURTS BELOW EXCEPT FOR COMPELLING REASONS
THE SECOND APPELLATE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF THE TWO COURTS BELOW EXCEPT FOR THE COMPELLING RESONS
The Sentence for a Person Who Impregnates a Primary School or A Secondary School Girl, Appeals Against a Plea of Guilt
The Sentence for Impregnating a School Girl,
THE SENTENCE START TO RUN WHEN THE ACCUSED PERSON IS CONVICTED NOT WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED
THE SITUATION UNDER WHICH A PRISON STATUS OF A PERSON MAY CNSTITUTE SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME
The Suspect Must be Informed On the Reason For the Arrest, Emergence Search, Contradictions in Evidence, Chain of Custody, Retrospective
THE TEST FOR THE GRANT OF A RESTRAINING ORDER S.38 (1) (2) OF THE POCA
THE TEST FOR THE GRANT OF A RESTRAINING ORDER S.38 (1) (2) OF THE POCA
THE TRIAL JUDGE’S FAILURE TO APPEND SIGNATURE AFTER RECORDING THE EVIDENCE OF EVERY WITNESS
The Very Best of the Witnesses in Any Criminal Trial is an Accused Person Who Freely Confesses His Guilt, Oral Evidence Must Be Direct,
THERE IS NO LAW REQUIRING THAT AN ACCUSED MUST BE REMINDED A CHARGE BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF PROSECUTION CASE
There is No Law that Required the Documents Admitted During PH to be Read Over in Court, Procedure in Trials Before Subordinate Courts
THERE IS NO SPECIFIC NUMBER OF WITNESSES REQUIRED TO PROVE A FACT
THREE ELEMENTS OF ARMED ROBBERY
Time Barred Criminal Appeal Shall Be Struck Out Not Dismissed, Right to Be Heard, Criminal Appeals From Subordinate Courts to the High Court,
Time Spent in Custody Must Be Deducted, No Particular Number of Witnesses is Required, Charge and Information Differs
TO CONSTITUTE A DEFENCE IN A CHARGE OF MURDER THE BELIEF IN WITCHCRAFT MUST BE FOUNDED ON SOME PHYSICAL AND NOT METAPHYISICAL ACT
TRANFER OF CASES, WHETHER THE CHIEF JUSTICE CAN TRANSFER A PARTY HEARD CASE FROM ONE JUDGE TO ANOTHER SECTION 13 OF THE HIGH COURT ACT
Transfer of a Prisoner from One Prison to Another is Good Cause for Extension of Time, Extension of Time the Applicant Being a Prisoner
Transfer of the Case to the Resident Magistrate with Extended Jurisdiction, Lack of the Transfer Order, Overriding Objective Principle,
Transfer of the Case to the Resident Magistrate with Extended Jurisdiction, Lack of the Transfer Order, Overriding Objective Principle,
Trial in Camera Sexual Offences, Failure to Cite Punishment Provision, Contradictions in Evidence, Best Evidence in Sexual Offences,
TRIAL MAGISTRATE FAILED TO INFORM THE APPELLANT OF HIS RIGHTS TO CALL WITNESS IN HIS DEFENCE AND ALSO TO REQUEST THE COURT TO ASSIST HIM TO COMPEL THEIR ATTENDANCE BY A COURT SECTION 231(4) OF TH
TRIAL WITHIN A TRIAL
TRIAL WITHIN A TRIAL TO ADMISSIBILITY OF A REPUDIATED CONFESSION
TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL, STATEMENT OF ACCUSED, BURDEN IS ON THE PROSECUTION TO PROVE THAT IT WAS MADE VOLUNTARLY
TRIAL, CONVICTION ENETERED BUT THE PASSING OF SENTENCE IS STAYED PENDING APPEAL,WHETHER PROPER IN LAW, SECTION 289(3) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT
U
V’
VARIATION OF SENTENCE
VISUAL AND VOICE IDENTIFICATION IS TOO WEAK
VISUAL AND VOICE IDENTIFICATION
VARIANCE OF NAMES OF WITNESSES-FAILURE TO TENDER DEED POLL ON CHANGE OF NAMES
Variance Between the Charge and Evidence, Failure to Amend the Charge, Contradictions in Evidence, The Return of an Item to a Person
Variance Between the Charge and Evidence
VARIANCE BETWEEN THE CHARGE AND EVIDENCE
VARIATION OF SENTENCE BY APPELLATE COURT
VISUAL IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE
VISUAL IDENTIFICATION
W
WAY FOWARD WHEN THE DEFENCE CASE IS NOT CONSIDERED BY THE TRIAL AND THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT
WAY FOWARD WHERE THE TRIER FAILS TO SUM UP PROPERLY THE CASE TO ASSESSORS
When Accused is Charged with Both Economic and Non-Economic, DPP Certificate Conferring Jurisdiction Must Be Issued under S. 12 (4),
WHERE A PERSON COMMITS MORE THAN ONE OFFENCE AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME SERIES OF TRANSACTION, IT IS PROPER TO IMPOSE CONCURRENT SENTENCES
WHEN A TRIAL IS ADJOURNED, ASSESSOR MUST ATTEND ADJOURNED SITTING AT EVERY AND SUBSEQUENT SITTING UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL
WHERE AN ACCUSED PERSON PLEADS GUILTY TO THE CHARGE READ OVER TO HIM, THE COURT HAS NO OPTION BUT TO CONVICT HIM AND PASS A SENTENCE WITHOUT TRIAL
WHERE DEATH OCCURS AS A RESULT OF A FIGHT BETWEEN THE DECEASED AND THE ACCUSED THE ACCUSED, THE ACCUSED PERSON SHOULD BE FOUND GUILTY OF THE LESSER OFFENCE OF MANSLAUGHTER
WHERE ONE ACTS AMENDS ANOTHER ACT AMENDING ACT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS ONE WITH THE AMENDED ACT
WHETHER A TOY OISTOL IS AN AMRM WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARMS AND AMMUNITION ACT
WHETHER AN AGGRIEVED VICTIM OF A CRIME CAN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF A DISTRICT COURT WHERE THE DPP DOES NOT APPEAL
WHETHER APPELLATE COURT MAY ALTER A SENTENCE IMPOSED BY TRIAL COURT
WHETHER HEROIN HYDROCLORIDE IS ONE OF THE SUBSTANCES LISTED IN THE FIRST SCHEDULE TO THE DCEA AS DRUGS
WHETHER HIGH COURT HAS POWER TO SUMMARILY DISMISS ON APPEAL
WHETHER LABOUR OFFICER ARE PUBLIC PROSECUTORS WITH POWER TO INSTITUTE AND PROSECUTE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
WHETHER LABOUR OFFICER MAY INSTITUTE AND PROSECUTE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER LABOUR LAWS
WHETHER REVISION CAN BE RESORTED TO WHERE THERE IS ARIGHT OF APPEAL
WHETHER THE APPELLATE COURT MAY ALTER A SENTENCE IMPOSED BY THE TRIAL COURT
WHETHER THE COURT MAY CONVICT OF MURDER WITHOUT REQUIRING THE ASSESSORS TO MAKE A FINDING WHETHER THE WORDS ULTERED WERE PROVOCATIVE
WHETHER THE HIGH COURT CAN ORDER A PERSON WHOSE APPEAL IT HAS ALLOWED TO PROVIDE SECURITY TO APPEAR IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DPP
WHETHER THE HIGH COURT CAN ORDER THE DPP TO LODGE AN APPEAL
WHO CAN ISSUE A TROPHY EVALUATION CERTIFICATE- DIFINITION OF GAME RANGER NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WILDLIFE OFFICER A WILDLIFE RANGER A GAME RANGER OR WILDLIFE RANGER
Who Is Authorized to Issue a Trophy Valuation Certificate, Oral Evidence Can Prove the Case, Chain of Custody, Search and Seizure
WITCHCRAFT AS A DEFENCE TO MURDER-DEFINITION OF WITCHCRAFT
WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL
WITNESSES OLY SAW APPELLANTS WITH THE DECEASED BODY
Wrong Citation of the Punishment Provision in A Charge, Contents of Every Charge or Information, Best Evidence in Rape,
WRONG CITATION OF THE PUNISHMENT PROVISION IN A CHARGE
Y
Z