You need to login to view the following content . Please Login. Not a Member? Join Us
A
A STAY OF EXECUTION IS AN EXECEPTION TO LEGAL PROCESS OF EXECUTION OF A DECREE
AN AFFIDAVIT MUST BE COUNTERED BY AN AFFIDAVIT
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION-OVERTAKEN BY EVENTS-NO STAY ORDER AGAINST EXECUTED DECREE
A NOTICE OF INTENDED EXECUTION MAY TAKE DIFFERENT FORMS LIKE PUBLICATIO, ADVERTISEMEN, CONDUCT, A LETER, VERBAL
APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF TITLE BEFORE THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES AMOUNTS TO NOTICE OF INTENDED EXECUTION-EXECUTION WITHOUT INVLOVING THE COURTS
A SUIT CONSISTING WRONG PERSON OUGHT TO BE DISMISSED
A SUIT FOUND ON JUDGMENT MUST BE INTENDED EITHER TO ENFORCE THE JUDGT
AFFIDAVIT WITHOUT A PROPER VERIFICATION
AFFIDAVIT= AN APPLICATION FILED WITH INCURABLY DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVIT SHOULD BE STRUCK OUT
AFFIDAVIT=DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT=FAILURE BY COUNSEL TO ATTACH AN AFFIDAVIT OFTHE COURT CLERK IN HIS AFFIDAVIT AMOUNTS TO MERE ALLEGATIONS
AFFIDAVIT=JURAT AND PRAYERS IN THE AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT=WHAT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ARGUMENT
AGENCY AGREEMENT , AN INTERPRETER MUST SWEAR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS
ALLEGATION MUST BE SUPPORTED WITH EVIDENCE
AN APPEAL WHICH HAS NOT EXHAUSTED PROPER REMEDIES CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED
AN APPEAL WHICH IS FILED OUT OF TIME SHALL BE STRUCK OUT WITH COSTS
AN APPLICATION WHICH WAS INADVERTENTLY FILED TO THE COURT
APPEAL FILED OUT OF TIME
APPEAL INSTITUTED OUT OF TIME WITHOUT EXTENSION OF TIME CAN NOT STAND
APPEAL ORIGINATING FROM PRIMARY COURTS SHOULD BE GOVERNED BY THE MCA
APPEAL STRUCKED OUT FOR WANT OF PROPER DECREEE
APPEAL, EXPARTE JUDGMENT AND REVISION
APPEAL=WHERE AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IS FRIVOLOUS AND ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS SHALL BE REFUSED
APPEAL=WHERE AN INTENDED APPEAL HAS NO CHANCE OF SUCCESS AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL MUST BE REJECTED
APPEAL=WHERE AN INTENDED APPEAL IS HOPELESS THE COURT WILL NOT HESITATE TO DIRECT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPRINGS FROM STATUTE, STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, MEMORANDUM AND PETITION OF APPEAL
APPLICATION =INADVERTANTLY APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXCUTION COURT MAY ORDER DEPOSIT OF SECURITY
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXCUTION
APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS THE DISCRETION OF THE COURT UPON SUFFICIENT REASON
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, DEEMED AGENT FOR PURPOSE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE
AN ORDER DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR BEING FILED OUT OF TIME
APPEAL RREQUIRING LEAVE
A POINT NOT RAISED IN THE HIGH COURT CANNOT BE RAISED AT THE CAT IN THE SECOND BITE APPLICATION
ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ON THE SECOND BITE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF OVERRRIDING OBJECTIVE
AN EXPARTEE JUDGEMENT IS APPLEABLE
A CLAIM WHICH WAS NOT CHALLENGED IN ANY WAY THERE IS NO DUTY TO PROVE ANYTHING MORE BUT FOR GENERAL DAMAGES AND INTERESTS CLAIMED MUST BE PROVED
A FANCIFUL APPLICATION OUGHT TO BE STRUCK OUT
A Claim of Loss of Profit Falls Within a Specific Claim Requiring Strict Proof, Every Suit Shall Include the Whole of the Claim,
A COURT MAY BASE ITS DECISON ON AN UNPLEADED ISSUE IF IT LEFT TO THE COURT FOR DECISION
A Court of Law Cannot Enforce a Dubious Business Deal
A Defective Verification Clause is Curable, Revision is Not Alternative to Appeal, Tests to Consider for the Court to Exercise Revisionary Powers
A DEFECTIVE VERIFICATION CLAUSE IS CURABLE
A JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE CANNOT SET ASIDE THE DECISION OF HIS FELLOW
A Judge or Magistrate Should Refrain from Setting Aside the Decision of a Fellow Judge or Magistrate, When a Court is Said to Be Functus Officio,
A Justice of Appeal Cannot Sit in a Judgment for Which He Had Adjudicated, Trespasser Cannot Claim for Unlawful Eviction,
A MATTER WHICH IS HELD TO BE TIME BARRED CANNOT BE REVIVED
A Party Cannot Be Blamed for an Advice Made by A Lawyer, Delay of 10 Days is Not Inordinate
A PARTY SHOULD NOT BE PUNISHED A MISTAKE DONE BY THE COURT ITSELF
A Party Should Not Be Punished for Negligence of His Advocate, Principles Governing Reference,
A Period of Time Within Which an Application for Stay of Execution Can Be Made, Stay of Execution Must be Filed within 14 Days
A Person Buying Property from the Administrator Before the Revocation of His Appointment, is a Bona Fide Purchaser, Revoked Administrator
A PERSON WHO WAS NOT INVLOVED IN ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS HAS CAPACITRY TO BRING APPEAL
A PLEADING CAN BE AMENDED AT ANY STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE COURTT
A Second Bite Application for Extension of Time Has to Be Filed Within 14 Days, A Point of Law Can Be Raised at Any Stage,
A Second Bite Application for Leave to Appeal Must Be Filed within 14 Days,
A SECOND BITE IS NOT AN APPEAL OR REVISION, IT IS COMPLETELY A NEW BATTLE
A SPECIFIED PUBLIC CORPORATION HAS LOCUS STANDI TO SUE IN ITS OWN NAME
A STAY ORDER HAS AN EFFECT OF SUSPENDING EXECUTION OF DECREE
A Stay to Execute a Decree or Order Can Only Be Made in Respect of an Executable Decree, an Order Dismissing the Suit is Not Executable,
A VISIT OF THE LOCUS IN QUO
Absence of a Letter from the Registrar in the Record of Appeal, Effect of Informal Collection of Documents for Appeal Purposes
ACCOMPANYING DOCUMEMBTS IN AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
Accompanying Documents in an Application for Leave to Appeal, A Ruling and an Order Are Two Different Documents
ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS IN AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
Account for Each Day of Delay Even If There is Illegality, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient, No Omnibus Application, Factors for Extension of Time,
Account for Each Day of Delay, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown,
Account for Each Day of Delay, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Revision Initiated by a Party
Account for Each Day of Delay, Illegality as Ground for Extension of Time, Affidavit from Another Person, Technical Delay,
Account for Each Day of Delay
Additional List of Documents
Admission of a Document Without Objection is Not Conclusive Proof of Its Contents, The Award of Interests, Sanctity of Contract
ADMISSION OF PROOF BY THE HIGH COURT AND DISTRICT COURT IN EXERCISE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE APPELLATE JURISDICTIONS
Adverse Inference Applies in Criminal Cases, Trespass to Land, Non-Joinder of Parties, A Party Suing Has the Right to Choose Who to Sue, Res Judicata
Advocate Duty to the Court, Reminder to the Legal Fraternity, Importance of Knowing Procedural Law, Failure to File Affidavit to Cover All Applicants,
ADVOCATE-USING A GUN TO A KNIFE FIGHT
AFFIDAVIT CONTAINS DEFECTIVE VERIFICATION CALUSE-EFFECT
AFFIDAVIT NOT SHOWING IN THE JURAT OF ATTESTATION AT WHAT PLACE OF THE AFFIDAVIT WAS TAKEN, SUCH AFFIDAVIT IS DEFECTIVE
AFFIDAVITS, SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT, CONDITIONS FOR FILING SUPPLIMENTARY AFFIDAVIT
Allegation of Fraud in Civil Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved, Failure to Frame Issues is Fatal If It Leads to Miscarriage of Justice,
Allegation of Fraud in Civil, Failure to Mention Names of the Parties, Delay to Pay Levy, One Name of the Seller, Mediation Without the Administrator
ALTHOUGH THE APPELLATE COURT IS NOT OBLIGED TO CONSIDER ALL GROUNDS OF APPEAL, IT IS SUPPOSED TO RESOLVE ALL COMPLAINTS RAISED IN THE APPEAL
AMENDEMENT OF DOCUMENTS-THE APPELLATE COURT CANNOT GRANT LEAVE TO AMEND DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO IMPLEAD A NEW PARTY
AMENDEMENT OF PLEADINGS
AMENDEMNT OF PLAINT, WHEN SUCH APPLICATION MAY BE MADE
AMENDENTMENT OF THE LETTER APPLYING FOR REFERENCE
Amendment of Pleadings and Joinder of Parties Cannot be Made Without Leave of the Court, Failure to Conduct Final PTC is Fatal,
AN ANNEXTURE TO PLAINT OR WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE RELIED UPON
An Annexure to A Plaint or WSD Is Not Evidence That Can Be Relied Upon, He Who Alleges Must Prove,
AN APPEAL AND REVISION ARE TWO DISTINCT CAUSES WITH DIFFERENT OUTCOMES
AN APPEAL CANNOT BE JOINED WITH AN APPLICATION FOR REVISION
AN APPEAL WHICH IS TIME BARRED SHALL BE STRUCT OUT AND NOT DISMISSED
AN APPLICATION FOR LIFTING GARNISHEE ORDER NISI CAN BE ENTERTAINED AND GRANTED WHILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE COURT OF APPEAL
AN APPLICATION NOT DETERMINED ON MERIT, SHOULD BE STRUCT OUT AND NOT BE DISMISSED
AN EXIHIBIT WHICH IS NOT PLEADED CANNOT BE RELIED UPON
AN INTERPLEADER SUIT-S.63 AND ORDER XXXIII OF THE CPC
An Invitee Cannot Own Land to Which He Was Invited, The Law On Abandonment of Village Land, Time Limit in Land Matters is 12 Years,
AN ORDER DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR BEING FILED BEYOND THE PRESCRIBED TIME AMOUNTS TO A DECREE
An Order for Amendment of Pleadings Should Not Be General, The Law On Amendment of Pleadings, No New Facts in Amended Plaint,
An Order for Arrest and Detention That is Made in Execution of a Decree is Appealable with Leave, No Revision Where a Party Has Right to Appeal,
An Order for Stay of Execution Can Only Be Made in Respect of an Executable Decree or Order,
An Order of the High Court Refusing to Set Aside the Dismissal Order and an Ex Parte Order is Appealable with Leave, Appeals in Land Matters,
An Order of the High Court Striking Out or Dismissing a Suit on Account of Expiry of the Speed Track is Appealable or Amenable to Revision,
ANNEXURES ATTACHED TO WRITTEN SUBMISSION, WHETHER DOCUMENTS CONSTITUTING EVIDENCE OF FACTS MAY BE ATTACHED TO WRITTEN SUBMISSION
ANY REFERENCE CONCERNING A SUMMARY DISMISSAL UNDER THE REPEALED LAWS (LABOUR) SHOULD BE DEALT WITH AS IF THE SAME HAD NOT BEEN REPEALED
APPEAL AGAINST AN ORDER ALLOWING OBJECTION TO ATTACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL AGAINST ANA ORDER ALLOWING OBJECTION TO ATTACHEMENT
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF THE REGISTRAR TO THE HIGH COURT, ORDER XXXIX RULE 1(1) OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
Appeal from Orders, Memorandum of Appeal accompanied by decree not an order, whether appeal is properly before the court
APPEAL FROM RULING OF THE HIGH COURT, WHETHER A RULING OF THE HIGH COURT REJECTING AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW CAN BE APPEALED AGAINST, SECTION 5(1)(c) OF THE AJA AND RULE 7(1) OF THE CIV
Appeal Instead of Review, Review Has a Narrow Scope, Revision Against the Ruling Refusing to Grant Review,
Appeal Must Be Filed Within 60 Days After Being Notified by The Registrar That the Requested Documents Are Ready for Collection,
APPEAL RO THE COURT OF APPEAL ON THE LAND MATTERS ORIGINATING FROM THE WARD TRIBUNAL REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW
APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL RESPONDENT NOT SERVED WITH COPIES OF THE MEMORANDUM AND RECORD OF APEAL, WHETHER APPEAL IS COMPETENT
APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, APPEAL LODGED OUT OF TIME, WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEAL MAY INVOKE THE PROVSION OF THE RULE 3 AND PROCEED TO ENTERTAIN AN APPEAL LODGED OUT OF TIME, RULE 3
APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, APPEAL LODGED OUT OF TIME, WHTHER THE COURT OF APPEAL MAY INVOKE THE PROVSION OF
APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ACCOMPANYING BY INVALID DECREE
APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT FROM PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ON TRADEMARK PROCEEDINGS, LAW APPLICABLE SECTION 116 OF TRADE MARK
APPEALS AGAINST INTERCUTORY ORDERS, NO APPEALS AGAINST INTERCUTORY ORDERS WHERE THE ORDER DOES NOT FINALLY DETERMINE THE SUIT SECTION 5(2)(d) of the AJA
Appeals Against Interlocutory Decisions, The Judgment On Admission is an Interlocutory Decision Hence Not Appealable
Appeals Against the Decisions of the Industrial Division of the High Court of Zanzibar, Omission to Include a Document in a Record of Appeal,
Appeals from Interlocutory Decisions,
APPEALS IN ELECTION PETITION, APPEAL AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS IN AN ELECTION PETITION
APPEALS REQUIRING LEAVE
APPEALS TO DISTRICT COURT ON POINTS OF LAW ONLY FINAL
APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL CASE ORIGINATING FROM PRIMARY COURT, A CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW OBTAINED, WHETHER LEAVE TO APPEAL IS NECESSARY
APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURTS IN ZANZIBAR, WHETHER POINT OF LAW SHOULD BE CERTFIED FOR DETERMINATION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
Appeals to The Court of Appeal, Within 60 Days,
Appeals to the Court of Appeal, Within 60 Days,
APPEARANCE IN COURT ON THE DATE FIXED
APPELAED CALLED UP FOR HEARING AFTER PARLIAMENT DISSOLVED, WHETHER THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE APPEAL
Appellant Duty to Follow Up Documents from The Registrar for Appeal Purposes, Affidavit from Another Person
Appellant Duty to Follow Up Documents from The Registrar for Appeal Purposes, Application to Strike Out the Notice of Appeal
Appellant Duty to Follow Up Documents from The Registrar for Appeal Purposes, Powers to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal
APPERANCE AND PARTICIPATION OF ANY PARTIES IN SUO MOTU REVISIONAL PROCEEDINGS
Applicability of Section 21 of the Law of Limitation Act, Action Begins to Run When One Becomes Aware of the Act Which is Complained of,
Applicability of Section 21 of the LLA, Automatic Exclusion of Time Spent in Prosecuting Other Proceedings in Computing Time Limitation
Applicability of Section 21 of the LLA, Automatic Exclusion of Time Spent in Prosecuting Proceedings, The Award of Interests, Sanctity of Contract
APPLICANT SEEKING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL AFTER PREVIOUS NOTICE IS STRUCT OUT FOR FAILURE TO SERVE IT ON THE RESPONDENT
APPLICANTS NOT CITED AS THE RESPONDENTS IN AN APPEAL BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT BUT WRE ADVERESLY AFFECTED BY THE DECISION IN THE APPEAL-WHETHER THEY HAD A RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN THE APP
Application by the Legal Representative to Be Made a Party in an Application, Once a PO is Determined, It Cannot Be Re-Opened,
APPLICATION FOR EXECUTION OF DECREE MADE TO A MAGISTRATE OTHER THEN THE ONE WHO PASSED THE DECREE, WHETHER THE OTHERMAGISTRATE MAY HEAR AND DETERMINE APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF ME TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REVIEW FROM THE JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Appeal Second Bite Must be Made within 14 Days
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DFENCE NOT MADE BEFORE THE EXPIRY OF THE PERIO PRESCRIBED FOR LODGING WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIONS, PRAYER FOR DISPENSATION OF NOTICE TO THE OTHER PARTIES, CONSIDERATIONS THAT THE COURT MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT BEFORE GRANTING APPLICATION FOR DISPENSATION
Application for Leave to Amend the Memorandum of Appeal So as to Add Additional Grounds of Appeal, CJ to Constitute a Full Bench,
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL SO AS TO ADD GROUNDS OF APPEAL
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (SECOND BITE) FROM THE DECISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT MBEYA
Application for Leave to Appeal Must First Be Made in The High Court and Determined On Merits to Warrant the Secod Bite in The Court of Appeal
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, WHETHER HIGH COURT AND COURT OF APPEAL HAVE CONCURRENT JURISDICTION
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, WHETHER COPY OF THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION, COURT PRACTICE IN ZANZIBAR
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AND DEFEND
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTRODUCE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS OF APPEAL-PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO APPLY FOR SUCH LEAVE ORALLY
Application for Leave to Join Suo Motu Revisional Proceedings is Not Time-Bound as it is the Discretion of the Court Whether to Join a Party or Not
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAWAL SUIT WITH LEAVE TO REFILE FRESH SUIT IN RESPECT OF THE ABANDONED SUIT
APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE FROM THE DECISION OF A SINGLE JUSTICE
APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE
Application for Restoration of the Dismissed Application, PRIDE COM v. STANBIC BANK
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
APPLICATION FOR REVISION BROUGHT UNDER SECTION 79 (1) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, WHETHER IS COMPETENT
APPLICATION FOR REVISION MUST BE LODGED WITHIN SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF DECISION SOUGHT TO BE REVISED
APPLICATION FOR REVISION SEEKING AN ORDER TO TRANSFER THE CASE TO ANOTHER JUDGE ON ACCOUNT OF BIAS, FIRST TRIAL JUDGE NEVER REFUSED TO DISQUALIFY HIMSELF, WHETHER APPLICATION PROPER
APPLICATION FOR REVISION, CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH SUCH APPLICATION MAY BE GRANTED
Application for Stay of Execution Must Be Filed Within 14 Days,
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING APPEAL, IMMEDIATE EXECUTION WILL DISPOSES APPLICANT OF LAND SHA HAS BEEN OCCPAYING FOR A LONG TIME
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION SOUGHT WHERE THERE IS NO COURT ORDER GRANTING TO THE RESPONDENT ANY RIGHT TO EXECUTE OR TO DO ANYTHING AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OR INTRESTS OF THE APPLICAN
APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION, WHETHER LEAVE TO APPEAL IS A PRE REQUISITE
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, APPLICATION BROUGHT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER XXXVII RULE 1 AND 3 AND SECTION 95 OF CPC WHETHER THE APPLICATION WAS PROPERLY FILED
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, ORDER
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INUNCTION BROUGHT UNDER THE PROVISION OF ORDER XXXVII rule 1 and 3 and section95 of the civil Procedure Code, WHETHER THE APPLICATION WAS PROPERLY FILED
Application Should be Made in the High Court First, then in the Court of Appeal as a Second Bite,
APPLICATION SUPPORTED BY A DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVIT, WHETHER APPLICATION IS COMPETENT
Application to Pre empty PO not permisible
APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE ORDER FOR EX-PARTE PROOF
Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal for Failure to Collect Documents for Appeal Purposes,
Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal, A Second Bite Application,
Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal,
Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal,
Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal
Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal,
Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal,
APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT NOTICE OF APPEAL, LETTER TO THE REGISTRAR APPLYING FOR A COPY OF RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FOR APPEAL PURPOSES NOT SERVED ON THE RESPONDENT, EFFECT THEREOF
Application to Strike Out the Notice of Appeal for Failure to Take Essential Step to Institute the Intended Appeal
Application to Strike Out the Notice of Appeal,
Application to Strike Out the Notice of Appeal
APPLICATION TO THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF A HIGH COURT DECISOON WHERE NO NOTICE TO APPEAL AGAINST IT IS LODGED, WHETHER IS COMPETENT
Applications for injuctive reliefs are more appropriately suited for the court excercising o
APPLICATIONS, FRESH APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION AFTER DISMISSAL OF A SIMILAR APPLICATION BY THE SAME COURT, WHETHER PROPER
Arbitration proceedings, statutory provisions prescribing special conditions to be observed in instituting legal proceedings against defendant – Copy
ARBITRATOR ‘S AWARD, AMOUNT AWARDED BY ARBITRATOR NEGOTIATED DOWNWARDS BY DECREE HOLDER’S ADVOCATES, WHETHER PROPER
ASESSORS, SUBSTITUTION OF ASSESSOR AFTER TRIAL HAS COMMENCED, EFFECT THEREOF, SECTION 7 OF THE MCA
Assessors Are Not Allowed to Cross Examine Witnesses but They Can Put Questions After Re-Examination and Not Before, Improper Summing
Assessors in The District Land and Housing Tribunal
Attoney General cannot be joined in a suit (Misc) if he was not party in main or former suit_S.6(3)
Automatic Exclusion of Time Requisite for Obtaining a Copy of Judgement and Decree, Memorandum of Appeal to Be Accompanied with Judgment
Automatic Exclusion of Time Requisite for Obtaining Copies, Appeals from the District Court to the High Court, Within 90 Days, Computation of Time,
Automatic Exclusion of Time Requisite for Obtaining Documents, Computation of Time Starts After Receiving All the Documents,
Automatic Exclusion of Time Spent in Obtaining Documents, Procedure of Collecting Documents in the High Court, Overriding Objective Principle,
AWARD COSTS OF A SUIT WHERE NO PRAYER FOR COSTS IS MADE IN THE PLAINT
AWARD OF INTREST AT COMMERCIAL AND COURT RATES, WHEN SUCH INTREST RATES MAY BE AWARDED
A CAUSE OF ACTION CAN BE DISCERNED FROM THE PLEADINGS
AMENDMENT OF DOCUMENTS-CORRECTION OF THE DATE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL
APPERANCE BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL
B
BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE, GUIDING PRINCIPLES
BASIS OF JUDGEMENT, WHETHER EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION MAY BE ACTED UPON
BASIS UPON WHICH THE COURT COULD BE MOVED TO INVOKE ITS REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
BILL OF COSTS OR TAXATION AFTER NOTICE OR APPEAL IS FILED
BILL OF COSTS, WHETHER OR NOT AN ADVOCATE HAS BEEN INTRUCTED TO BE DETERMINED DURING TAXATION
BILL OF COSTS
Bill of Costs-Need to attach a copy of the ruling –
BUILDING CONTRACT, CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION FOR DEVALUATION
C
CASE INSTITUTED BY NUMEROUS PLANTIFFS, WHETHER ONLY A FEW OF THEM MAY TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE O F OTHERS
CERTICICATE OF DELAY INCORRECTLY, IMPROPERLY AND ERRONEOUSLY CERTIFIED EFFECT
CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR, PRESUMPTION THAT CERTIFICATE IS RIGHT AND REGULAR SECTION 122 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT
Certificate of Delay Having Been Declared to be Invalid, It Has No Legal Effect, Inclusion of the Invalid Certificate of Delay in Supplementary Record, AGGREKO
CERTIFICATE OF DELAY ISSUED BY REGISTRAR WHO HAD NOT SUPPLIED THE APPELLANT WITH DOCUMENTS REQUESTED
CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW IN LAND MATTERS
CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW IN MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS IS NOT A REQUIREMENT IN APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
CERTIFICATE ON POINTS OF LAW
CHAMBER APPLICATION CASES
Choice of Forum Clauses in International Law, Hamburg Rules in Tanzania, Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration, Depart from its Previous Decision,
CONDITIONS FOR A DISMISSAL ORDER ON THE MATTER BEFORE THE DLHT DUE TO NON APPERANCE OF AN ADVOCATE
CIRCUMSTANCE UNDER WHICH COURT MAY EXERCISE ITS JUDICIAL DISCREATION AND GRANT LEAVE TO REVOKE
Circumstances Where Incompetent Appeal Cannot Be Struck Out, Exercise Revisional Jurisdiction While Hearing Appeal, Dismissal and Striking Out, FURNISHERS
CIRCURSTANCES WITHIN WHICH THE COURT CAN REVIEW ITS OWN DECISION
CIRCUSTANCES IN WHICH AN ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MAY BE GRANTED
CIRCUSTANCES IN WHICH TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MAY BE GRANTED
CIRCUSTANCES IN WHICH TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MAY BE GRANTED
CIRCUSTANCES UNDER WHICH LEAVE TO DEFEND MAY BE GRANTED
CIVIL PRISON CASES
CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION NOT PLEADED AT THE TRIAL, WHETHER COMPETETNT TO RAISE IT ON APPEAL
COMPANIES STANDING IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER A FOREIGN NOT INCOPORATED IN ITS HOME COUNTRY CAN INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
COMPETENCY OF THE COURT TO HEAR REVISION APPLICATION SECTION 5(2)(d) of AJA
COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 60 IN SUIT AGAINST GOVERMENT
COMPOSITION OF DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL
COMPOSITION OF THE WARD TRIBUNAL
COMPUTATION OF TIME FOR APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT INMATTERS ORIGINATING IN PRIMARY COURTS
COMPUTATION OF TIME WHERE MATTER ORIGINATED FROM THE PRIMARY COURT
COMPUTATION OF TIME WHERE MATTER ORIGINATED FROM THE PRIMARY COURT
Concurrent Findings of Fact of the Lower Courts Cannot Be Interfered With
Condition for Grant of Leave to Appeal
CONDITION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
Conditions and Principles For Review at CAT, Apparent Error on the Face of Record as Ground For Review at CAT, No Order as to Costs When Application Doesn’t Resisted –
CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO ATTACH ONE COPY OF THE ORDERING REFUSING GRANT LEAVE BY HIGH COURT
CONCURRENT JURISDICTION IN LEAVE TO APPEAL
CONSEQUENCE OF NOT ATTACHING LOCUS IN QUO
COURTS OR TRIBUNALS ARE ENJOINED NOT TO ENTERTAIN ANY MATTER WHICH IS TIME BAARED- THE ISSUE OF THE TIME LIMITATION IS JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE
COSTS FOLLOW THE EVENTS
Conditions for Grant of Leave to Appeal, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ST.
Conditions for Grant of Leave to Appeal,
Conditions for Grant of Leave to Appeal
Conditions for Grant of Leave to Appeal
Conditions for Grant of Leave to Appeal, The Exercise of the Discretion Power Cannot Be Interfered with
CONDITIONS FOR INVOCATION OF REVISIONAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Application for Stay of Execution Must Be Filed Within 14 Days
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Ex Parte Stay Order
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Failure to Attach the Notice of Intended Execution in an Application for Stay of Execution, Security,
Conditions for Stay of Execution,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Security and Substantial Loss as Conditions for Stay of Execution
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Security as a Condition for Stay of Execution,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss and Security,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss and Security,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss and Security,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss and Security, Time Within Which to File Application for Stay of Execution
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Security,
Conditions for Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Submissions Are Not Evidence,
Conditions for the Grant of an Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order,
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal, Court Should Refrain from Determining Substantive Issues
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal, Difference Between Rejection and Strike Out
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal,
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal,
Conditions for the Grant of Leave to Appeal, is a Counter-claim Deemed Abandoned Upon Amendment of the Plaint,
Conditions for the stay of execution to be granted (1)
Conditions for the stay of execution to be granted (2)
Conditions of Issuance of Service to the Respondent, Contradictions in Evidence, Proof of Victim Age, Penalty for Unnatural Offence
Conditions to Establish Res Judicata, Estoppel Per Rem Judicatum, Parties Are Bound by Their Own Pleadings,
Confusion on the remedy available by the lay person is excusable technical delay for the court to grant the extension of time
CONSOLIDATION OF APPEALS
Constitutionality of Death Penalty, Res Judicata in Public Interest Cases, Like Life Litigation Must Come to an End,
CONTENT OF AFFIDAVIT WHICH IS TO BE USED AS EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT
CONTENT OF JUGMENT
Contents of The Notice of Appeal, Wrong Citation of the Case Number, Service of The Notice of Appeal, Non-Inclusion of Documents in Record of Appeal
COPIES OF LETTER APPLYING FOR RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS LEFT WITH THE COURT, WHETHER THE COURT IS BOUND TO SERVE COPIES OF THE SAID LETTER ON THE RESPONDENT
COPY OF DECREE TO BE ATTACHED TO THE MEMORANDUM
CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN A JUDGMENT, HIGH COURT OMITS TO AWARD INTREST ON A DECRETAL AMOUNT, WHETHER THAT IS AN ERROR WHICH THE COURT OF APPEAL MAY CORRECT UNDER SECTION 2(3) OF AJA
CORRECTION OF ERRORS, ERRORS COMMITTED BY PARTIES IN DRAWING UP DOCUMENTS SECTION 130 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE DECREE APPLIES TO CORRECTION OF SUCH ERRORS, PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOW
Correction of Judgement May Be Done by Way of a Separate Order, There Cannot Be Two Judgements in One Case
CORRECTION OF THE JUDGMENT
Court Cannot Grant Reliefs Not Prayed For, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings, Court is Also Bound by Pleadings,
COURT DISMISSED APPEAL BUT DID NOT AWARD COSTS, FACTORS CONSIDERED IN AWARDING COSTS
Court Duty to Join a Necessary Party, There is No Standard Criteria For Determining Who Are The Necessary Parties To A Suit,
COURT FORMS, CHIEF JUSTICE HAS NOT REPLACED THE INDIAN FORMS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, PURPOSE OF COURT FORMATS
COURT OF APPEAL, APPLICATION FOR REVISION, FORM PRESCRIBED FOR APPLICATION, NOTICE OF MOTION SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMING TO PRESCRIBED FORM
Court orders Counsel to first draw up and file a joint memorandum of facts not disputed followed by written submittions, Whether pleadings were regular
COURT ORDERS COUNSEL TO FIRST DRAW UP AND FILE A JOINT MEMORANDUM OF FACTS NOT DISPUTED FOLLOWED BY WRITTEN SUBMSSIONS,
COURT ORDERS COUNSEL TO FIRST DRAW UP AND FILE A JOINT MEMORANDUM OF FACTS NOT DISPUTED, WHETHER COURT ORDER WAS TENABLE
Court Orders Must Be Obeyed, The Rules of Court Must Be Obeyed, Factors for Extension of Time, THE CONCERN FOR DEVELOPMENT, AMBERO CONSULTING
Court Orders Must Be Respected and Complied with, When the Court Becomes Functus Officio, Doctrine of Res Sub-Judice, Retrial Principles,
COURT ORDERS MUST BE RESPECTED AND COMPLIED WITH
COURT PROCESS, PARTRY PURSUING TWO DIFFRENT AVENUES IN DIFFERENT COURTS AT THE SAME TIME, AN ABUSE OF THE COURT PROCESS
Court record is always pressumed to accurately represent what actually transpired in court
Court Should Not Grant Reliefs Not Prayed for, Special Damages Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Strictly Proved,
Court Should Not Raise New Issues in the Course of Composing the Decision Without Hearing the Parties, Right to Be Heard
COURT VACATION, APPLICATION FILED 3 DAYS BEYOND THE LIMITATION PERIOD BUT DURING A TIME WHEN THE COURT IS ON VACATION, WHETHER THE APPLICATION IS TIME BARRED
COURT WITH COMPETETNT JURISDICTION TO REVIEW, A DECISION OF A COURT OF A RESIDENT MAGISTRATE WITH EXTENDED JURISDICTION
COURT’S DUTY TO JOIN A NECESSARY PARTY TO A SUIT
Courts have bben reluctant to interfere in matters of academics in colleges and Universities especially though judicial review
COURT’S REVISIONSL POWER IS EXERCISED UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES
creteria for grant leave for judicial review
CONTRADICTIONS OF NAMES IN THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL
CMA has jurisdiction to mediate and arbitrate all disputes originating from the repealed la
D
DEFINITION OF THE TERM EXECUTION-EXECUTION CAN BE DONE WITH OR WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF THE COURT
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORDER AND DECREE
DEFINITION OF THE TERM ORDER
DEFINITION OF THE TERM DECREE
DIFFERENCE PROCEDURE FOR INSTITUTION OF REVISION AND REFERENCE
DOCUMMENTS TO BE ATTACHED WHEN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE IS SOUGHT AT THE HIGH COURT
DETERMINING THE MATTER WHICH IS NOT BEFORE THE COURT IS FATAL
DECREE MUST MATCH WITH JUDGEMENT-EXECUTING COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION TO MODIFY THE DECREE
DAMAGES NOT PLEADED, WHETHER DAMAGES NOT PLEADED ARE AWARDABLE
DAMAGES CASES
DAMAGES NOT PLEADED, WHETHER DAMAGES NOT PLEADED ARE AWARDABLE
Date of Receipt is a date of Filing.
Decision Dismissing Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Apply for Judicial Review is Appealable with Leave, Legal Point Be Raised at Any Time
Decision Granting Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Judgment is Not Appealable, No Appeal Lies Against Interlocutory Order, Definition of Suit,
Decision of Lower Court Not Been Reversed by Superior Court Remain Intact, Claim by Legal Representative, PO Must be on Pure Point of Law,
Decision of the High Court Dismissing the Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, is Appealable with Leave,
DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT, WHEN A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT MAY BE GIVEN
DECREE ACOMPANYING APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT
DECREE NOT SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE
DECREE SIGNED AND SEALED NEEDED NO CERTIFYING
DECREE, HIGH COURT EXERCISING APPELLATE JURISDICTION, DECREE SIGNED BY THE REGISTRAR
DECREE, PARTIES RE-NEGOTIATE THE COURT’S DECREE
DECRETAL AMOUNT, INTEREST ON DECRETAL AMOUNT
DEFAULT JUDGEMENT IN A SUIT WITH SEVERAL DEFENDANTS, ONE DEFENDANT FAILS TO FILE DEFENCE AND TRIAL COURT PRONOUNCES JUDGEMENT IN FAVOUR OF PLAINTIFF, THEN COURT PROCCEDS TO HEAR SUIT AG
DEFECTIVE AFFIDAVIT
Defective Certificate of Delay, Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal
Defective Certificate of Delay, Overriding Objective Principle,
Defective Certificate of Delay, Running of The Limitation Period Where a Party Writes to The Registrar Asking for Missing Part of the Proceedings
Defective Certificate of Delay, Running of Time for Appeal Purposes, The Status of the Cross Appeal in Event the Appeal is Struck Out,
Defective Certificate of Delay, What is the Way Forward When Certificate of Delay is Defective,
DEFECTIVE DECREE-DECREE MUST MARCH WITH THE JUDGEMENT-LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL
DEFECTIVE VERIFICATION IS AMENABLE
defective verification not fattal
DEFENCE NOT PLEADED IN THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE, WHEHER COURT BOUND TO ACCEPT THE UNPLEADED DEFENCE
DEFENCE OF ALIBI, NEED TO GIVE NOTICE OF DEFENCE OF ALIBI
DEFINITION OF CAUSE OF ACTION
Definition of Commercial Case, Elements of Commercial Case, Pecuniary Jurisdiction of the Resident Magistrate Court in Commercial Cases,
E
ELECTRONIC FILLING DOCUMENTS
EFFECT OF AN ORDER TO PROCEED EX-PARTE UNDER REGULATION 13(2) OF GN No. 174 of 2003
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PLEADING WITHIN TIME LIMITED
Definition of Illegality, Three Things to Establish for a Decision to be Attacked on Ground of Illegality, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time,
Definition of Private Employment Agency, Termination of Contract for Failure to Perform Contractual Obligations,
DEFINITION OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICE
DEFINITION OF THE TERM DECREE
DEFINITION OF THE TERM ORDER
DEFINITION OF VERIFICATION CALUSE
DETERMINING THE MATTER WHICH IS NOT BEFORE THE COURT IS FATAL
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DECREE AND AN ORDER
Difference Between Decree and Order, Some Orders Are Decrees, Failure to File Witness Statement, The Dismissed Suit Becomes Res Judicata,
difference between dismissal and struck out, time barred proceeding shall be dismissed
DIFINITION OF PUBLIC SERVANT
Discharge from Hospital is Not an Indication of Full Recovery from Sickness, No Need to Consider Illegality Where Delay Has been Accounted for
DISCLOSURE OF CAUSE OF ACTION
DISCOVERY OF NEW AND IMPORTANT MATTER CAN BE RAISED AS A GROUND FOR REVIEW IN THE HC
DISCOVERY OF NEW EVIDENCE AS GROUND FOR REVIEW
DISCOVERY OF NEW EVIDENCE IS A GROUND FOR REVIEW IN THE HIGH COURT AND NOT IN COURT OF APPEAL
DISCREATION, EXERCSE OF DISCREATION, PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING EXERCISE OF SUCH DISCREATION
DISCREATIONARY POWER OF GRANTING OR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME
Disobedience of Court Orders
Disobedience of Court Summons
DISTINCTION BETWEEN AN INJUCTION AD INTERIM AND A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
DISTINCTION BETWEEN NECESSARY AND NON-NECESSARY PARTIES
Division of Matrimonial Property, Burden of Proof, Sale of Matrimonial Property, Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Cannot be Interfered
DOCRINE OF RES JUDICATA
DOCRINE OF RES SUB-JUDICE
Doctrine of BONAFIDE PURCHASER, Doctrine of Adverse Possession, Accrual of Right of Action to Recover Land, Allegation of Fraud in Civil
DOCUMENTS ACCOMPNAYING AN APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
DOCUMENTS NOT ATTACHED IN PLEADINGS OR LIST OF DOCUMENTS CAN WITH LEAVE BE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTS TO ACCOMPANY MEMORANDUM OR PETITION OF APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT FROM PRIMARY COURT AND SUBORDINATE COURTS
DUTY OF PARTY WHO WISHES TO BE JOINED IN AN APPLICATION FOR REVISION COMMENCED BY THE CAT SUO MOTU
DUTY OF PARTY WHO WISHES TO BE JOINED IN AN APPLICTAION FOR REVISION COMMENCED BY THE CAT SUO MOTU
Duty of the Attorney General to Join the Proceeding Once He Becomes Aware of It, Audience by Attorney General in Matters of Public Interest
DUTY OF THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT
Duty to Follow Ups the Documents for Appeal Purposes, Failure to Approach the Registrar within 14 Days after Expiry of 90 Days,
Duty to Join the Necessary Party to a Suit,
Duty to Place the Record for Revision, The Discharged Administrator of the Estate Must Be Sued in His Capacity as Administrator
E
EFFECT OF A NULLITY APPLICATION
EFFECT OF DEGREE NOT SIGNED BY THE JUDGE WHO MADE THE DECISION
Effect of Failure to File Witness Statement, Failure to File Witness Statement is Equal to Failure to Call Witness,
Effect of Failure to Pay Stamp Duty, Sanctity of Contract, Breach of Contract, Breach of Lease Agreement, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings,
Effect of Having More Than One Certificate of Delay, Court Has No Jurisdiction to Entertain an Appeal Which is Time Barred,
EFFECT OF MISJOINDER OR NON JOINDER OF A PARTY TO A SUIT
EFFECT OF NON COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 83(1)(e) AND 90(1)
EFFECT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AN APPEAL TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE HOGH COURT
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT, WHETHER A JUDGEMENT CAN BE ENFORCED AGAINST A PERSON WHO WAS NOT A PARTY TO THE CASE
Essential Features of Lease, Withholding Tax on Rent, Definition of the Licence and Licensee,
Even If the Suit Proceeds Ex-Parte He Who Alleges Must Prove,
EVERY OTHER ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT IS APPEALABLE WITH LEAVE S. 5(1)(c) -AJA
Evidence Act Does Not Apply to Affidavits, Review under CPC, Court Should Not Raise Issues While Composing Judgement Without Hearing the Parties,
EVIDENCE CONFERRING LOCUS STANDI
EX PARTE HEARING, EFFECT OF POSTPONING HEARING EX PARTE, WHETHER PROVISION TO POSTPONE HEARING MAY BE USED TO ALLOW ABSENT PLANTIFF TO PROCEED EX PARTE
EX- PARTE JUDGMENT CASES
EX PARTE ORDER
Exclusion of Saturday and Sunday, The Applicant Must Take Immediate Action After Becoming Aware That He is Out of Time,
EXECUTION OF DECREE FOR DELIVERY OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, WHETHER EXECUTION ORDER IS NECESSARY FOR EFFECTUAL EXECUTION
EXECUTION OF DECREE, STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING APPEAL, APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING AN APPEAL THAT REQUIRES LEAVE TO APPEAL
EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS, SUCCEFUL LITIGANT ASSERTING RIGHT TO LAND THOUGH EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PERSONS WHO WERE NOT PARTIES TO THE SUIT, WHETHER NEW RIGHTS CAN BE DONE
Execution process has to caried in accordance with mandatory requirements of law
Execution Without Court Order, Settlement Deed Cannot Extinguish Mortgage Deed, Mesne Profit, Bona Fide Purchaser, Default Notice, Public Auction,
EXECUTION, STAY OF EXECUTION OF HIGH COURT ORDER, POWER OF COURT OF APPEAL
EXERCISE OF DISCREATION BY A COURT BEFORE WHICH AN APPLICATION IS MADE AND HEARD MAY BE INTERFERED WITH BY A HIGHER COURT
EXERCISE OF REVIEW POWERS BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, CIRCUSTANCES UNDER WHICH THE POWERS MAY BE INVOKED
EXPARTE PROCEEDING DUE TO NON APPERANCE BY DEFENDANT
EXTENSION OF TIME CASES
EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN APPEAL
EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE APPEAL ON ARERSPONDENT, NO PERSON AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE FOR THE RESPONDENT, WHETHER EXTENSION OF TIME MAY BE GRANTED
EXTENSION OF TIME UPON GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN -FACTORS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Definition of Good Cause,
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Factors for Extension of Time,
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Factors for Extension of Time, Technical Delay,
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Illegality
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown,
Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown,
EXTENSION OF TIME UPON GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN
EXTENSION OF TIME UPON GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN-FACTORS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
EXTENSION OF TIME, APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPLY FOR CORRECTION OR VARIATION OF JUDGEMENT, APPLICATION FILED MORE THAN A YEAR AFTER APPLICANT IS MADE AWARE OF THE NEED FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME, GROUNDS UPON WHICH TIME CAN BE EXTENDED BY THE COURT
Effect of Failure to Pay Stamp Duty, Sanctity of Contract, Breach of Contract, Breach of Lease Agreement, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings, MOHAMED ABOOD
F
FAILURE TO RESOLVE THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN THE PARTIES-FAILURE TO DETERMINE ISSUES RAISED BY THE PARTIES IN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FAILURE TO FILE ON TIME SUPPLIMENTARY RECORDS UPON OBTAINING LEAVE TO LODGE THE MISSING DOCUMENTS
Factors for Extension of Time to File Review. Account for Each Day of Delay,
Factors for Extension of Time, Account for Each Day of Delay
Factors for Extension of Time, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time by Itself is Sufficient
Factors for Extension of Time, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
Factors for Extension of Time, Technical Delay, No Additional Affidavit from Another Person When the Averment is Not Contradicted
Factors for the Grant of an Application for Restoration, Affidavit from Another Person
FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINATION OF A PURE POINT OF LAW
FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINATIONOF A PURE POINT OF LAW
Factors to Establish Employer-Employee Relationship, Remedies in Unfair Termination Do Not Apply in Contracts for Specific Tasks and Fixed Term
Failure by the Advocate to Act Within the Dictates of the Law, Illegality, Extension of Time to File Review, Principles Governing Reference
FAILURE BY THE APPELLATE COURT TO CONSIDER GROUNDS OF APPEAL
Failure by the Applicants to File Affidavits to Cover All of Them is Fatal, Application Must Be Supported by Affidavit, Supplementary Affidavit
Failure by the Applicants to File Affidavits to Cover All of Them is Fatal, Institution of Applications Before the Court of Appeal
FAILURE BY THE ARBITRATOR OF THE CMA TO ADMINISTER OATH OF THE WITNESSES BEFORE WENT ON TO TESTIFY AND TO APPEND SIGNATURE TO EACH WITNESSE’S EVIDENCE
Failure by the Intern from the Law School to Serve the Respondents with Copies of the Documents, Affidavit from Another Person,
Failure by the Subordinate Court to Commit the Accused Person for Trial by the High Court, The High Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Try Him
Failure to Apply for Leave to Appeal Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal
Failure to Apply for Leave to Appeal Where Required, Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps in Instituting an Appeal
Failure to Apply for Leave to Appeal Where Required, Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal
Failure to Assign Reasons For Taking Over the Proceedings From One Magistrate to Another is Fatal, An Order of Consideration of Time Spent in Prison After Retrial Order
Failure to Attach a Copy of the Ruling in an Application for Stay of Execution is Fatal and Overriding Objection Cannot Apply to Salvage Such an Omission,
Failure to Attach the Notice of Appeal in an Application for Stay of Execution is Fatal, Failure to File Affidavits to Cover All Applicants is Fatal
Failure to Conduct Mediation, Procedural Irregularity, Non-Endorsement of the Tendered Documents, Incomplete Record of Appeal,
FAILURE TO DETERMINE A COUNTER-CLAIM
Failure to Determine the Counterclaim, Failure to Determine the Framed Issues,
FAILURE TO DETERMINE THE FRAMED ISSUES
FAILURE TO DISCLOSE CAUSE OF ACTION, PETITION NOT DISCLOSING A CAUSE OF ACTION, ALLEGATION BY A PERSON THAT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OR DUTY OWED TO HIM HAS BEEN OR LIKELY TO BE VIOLATED
Failure to File a Notice of Appeal Before Filing an Appeal
Failure to File Affidavit in Rely, Leave to Appeal in Land Matters, Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time
FAILURE TO FILE AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY (COUNTER AFFIDAVIT)
Failure to File Affidavit in Reply, Failure to File Counter Affidavit, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
Failure to File Amended Pleading Within the Time Limited by the Court, A Visit of the Locus in Quo
FAILURE TO FILE AN AMENDED PLEADING WITHIN TIME LIMITED BY COURT
Failure to file witness statement is equated to plaintiff’s non appearance
Failure to File Written Statement of Defence, Default Judgment, Impartiality of the Evidence of the Expert Witness, Submissions Are Not Evidence
FAILURE TO FOLLOW UP THE DOCUMENTS FOR APPEAL PURPOSES
FAILURE TO FRAME ISSUES IS FATAL IF IT LEADS TO MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
Failure to Frame Issues, Failure to Frame the Required Issue is Fatal, Cross-Examination Has No Limit, the Limit is the Sky
Failure to Join Legal Representative of the Deceased Party in Accordance with the Law is Fatal, Join Administrator
Failure to Obtain Leave to Appeal, Point of Law Must Be Determined First
Failure to Request Documents for Appeal Purposes Within 30 Days and Serve On the Respondent Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps
FAILURE TO RERVE NOTICE OF MOTION AND RECORD OF THE REFERENCE ON RESPONDENT
Failure to Seek and Obtain Leave to Appeal Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal
Failure to Serve Notice of Appeal Within Time, Service of the Letter Requesting for Proceedings, Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal,
Failure to Serve Reminder Letters Does Not Amount to Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal
Failure to Serve the Notice of Appeal Within Time Amounts to Failure to Take Essential Steps, Failure to Serve the Letter, Service of the Letter
FAILURE TO SERVE THE RESPONDENTS WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WHETHER CAN BE CURED BY THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE PRINCIPLES
Failure to State in the Request Letter the Purpose of the Requested Documents, No Format of a Request Letter, Failure to Collect Documents
Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal, Appellant Duty to Follow Up Documents, the Home and Dry Principle Was Abolished in 2017
Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal, Failure to File Counter Affidavit, Failure to File Affidavit in Reply,
Failure to Take Essential Steps to Institute an Appeal, Failure to Write a Letter to the Registrar Requesting the Record,
filing is complete upon payment of court fees
FILLING RECORD OF APPEAL
Financial Constraint as a Ground for Extension of Time, Poverty as a Ground for Extension of Time, Second Bite Application for Extension of Time
FINDINGS IN SUITS MUST BE BASED ON ISSUES ARISING FROM PLEADINGS-EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE
FOREIGN JUDGEMENT, REGARD GIVEN TO A FOREIGN JUDGEMENT ON A MATTER ADJUDICATED UPON BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES SECTION 8 OF THE CPC
FORM OF APPLICATION, FORMAT FOR BRINGING APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
FORM OF NOTICE OF APPEAL
FORMAL APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL MADE TO THE HIGH COURT, WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO ATTACH COPY OF JUDGEMENT AND DECREE OF THE HIGH COURT AGAINST WHICH IT INTENDED TO APPEAL
Format of the Certificate Authenticating the Record of Appeal, Improper or Disorderly Arrangement of Documents in the Record of Appeal
Formation of Contract of Reinsurance, Facultative Reinsurance Cover, Rescission, Affirmation of Voidable Contract
Four Conditions for the DLHT to Proceed Ex-parte or Dismiss the Application, Remedy Against Ex Parte Judgement Issued by DLHT
FOUR TESTS OR CONDITIONS TO CONSIDER FOR THE COURT TO EXECRCISE REVISIONARY POWERS
FRAMING OF IISUES, POWER OF COURT TO FRAME ADDITIONAL ISSUE, DUTY OF THE COURT TO INFORM THE PARTIES
FRAMING OF ISSUES, ISSUES NOT ARGUED, COURT DECIDES CASE ON AN ISSUE NOT ARGUED, WHETHER IT IS PROPER
FRAMING OF ISSUES, ISSUES NOT PLEADED, WHETHER THE COURT HAS POWER TO DECIDE A CASE ON AN ISSUE NOT PLEADED
FRESH APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION AFTER DISMISSAL OF A SIMILAR APPLICATION BY THE SAME COURT, APPLICABILITY OF THE SAME OF LIMITATION TO SUCH SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION
FULL BENCH, AN ORDINARY COURT REFERRING A MATTER FOR DECISION OF THE SAME SITTING AS FULL BENCH OF FIVE JUSTICES, BASIS THEREOF
FULL BENCH
FUNCTION OF PLEADINGS
G
GRANT OF LEAVE IS THE DISCRETIONARY
GARNISHEE ORDER CASES
GARNISHEE ORDER, ORDER IMPOSED ON BANK ACCOUNTS OF A WRONG PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER ORDER MAY BE LIFTED
GENERAL DAMAGES ARE AWARDED AT THE DISCREATION OF THE COURT
GENERAL; DAMAGES CANNOT BE USED TO DETERMINE PECUNIARY JURISDICTION OF COURTS
GOOD CAUSE FOR NON APPERANCE OF DEFENDANT
GRANT TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS, RULING PRINCIPLES GUIDING COURTS IN INSURANCE OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS’
Great Chance of Success No Longer Constitutes Good Cause for Delay, Account for Each Day of Delay, Factors for Extension of Time,
GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION POWER TO TERMINATE AN EMPPLYEE VESTED IN THE PERMANENT SECRETARY, POWER TO TERMINATE AN EMPOYEE VESTED VESTED IN THE PERMANENT
GROUNDS FOR LIMITING APPEALS FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
Grounds for Review, A Manifest Error Apparent On the Face of Record as A Ground for Review
Grounds for Review, A Manifest Error on the Face of the Record, Wrong Citation of the Enabling Provision
Grounds for Review, Manifest Error On the Face of Record
Grounds for Review, Manifest Error On the Face of the Record as a Ground for Review
Grounds for Review, Mere Disagreement with Judgment is Not the Ground for Review, Review is Not an Appeal in Disguise
GROUNDS FOR REVIEW
GROUNDS FOR SEEKING LEAVE TO REVOKE A SUBMISSION TO ARBITRATION
Grounds for the Application, To Indicate Grounds in The Notice of Motion Is Mandatory and Failure to Do So Is Fatal
GUIDANCE AS TO THE LODGEMENT OF DOCUMEMTS-A DOCUMENT IS TAKEN TO HAVE BEEN LODGED ON THE DATE WHEN IT WAS ENDORSED AND UPON PAYMENT OF THE REQUIRED FEE
Guidance as to the Lodgment of Documents, Upon Payment of Fee, Revision Must Be Filed Within 60 Days
H
he Right to Appeal Against an Ex Parte Judgement is Automatic, No Need to Set Aside, One Cannot Challenge Both an Order to Proceed Ex-Parte and Merit
He Who Alleges Must Prove Even Where the Case Proceeds Ex-Parte
He Who Alleges Must Prove, Issuance of A Certificate of Occupancy, Proof of Fraud in Civil, Definition of Issues
He Who Alleges Must Prove, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings, Matters Not Raised in Lower Court
He Who Alleges Must Prove, Transfer of Land without Approval, Order Not Challenged and Overturned by a Superior Court, Remains to Be Valid
HE WHO ALLEGES MUST PROVE
HE WHO ALLEGES MUST PROVE-STANDARD OF PROOF IN CIVIL MATTERS
HIERACHY OF THE COURT IN MAINLAND TANZANIA AND ZANZIBAR
High Court Has No Jurisdiction to Extend Time to File the Letter Requesting Documents, Application to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal
HIGH COURT IS OUSTER POWER TO ENTERTAIN MATTERS AFTER A NOTICE OF APPEAL IS FILED AT THE CAT
HUMAN ERROR AS GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
I
IRREGULARITY REGARDING THE LETTER REQUESTING DOCUMENTS FOR APPEAL PURPOSES -DECISION SHALL BE READY FOR COLLECTION WITHIN NOT LESS THAN 21 DAYS
INTERPRETATION OF THE CLAUSE “WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE”AS IT APPEARS UNDER REGULATION 13(2) OF THE GN No. 174 OF 2003
INCOMPETENT MATTER SHOULD BE STRUCK OUT AND NOT DISMISSED
Ignorance of the Law or Pursuing a Wrong Remedy is Not a Good Cause for Extension of Time, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
IGNORANCE OF THE LAW OR RATHER PROCEDURE INVOLVED IN DOING SOMETHING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE GOOD CAUSE TO WARRANT EXTENSION OF TIME
IISUES OF LAW, AND ISSUES OF FACTS, WHETHER ISSUES OF LAW MAY DISPOSE OF THE CASE OR PART OF IT, COURT MUST DETERMINE ISSUES OF LAW FIRST
Illegality as a Ground Foe Extension of Time, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, A Single Justice Should Not Deal with the Substantive Issues
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Account for Each Day of Delay
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Account for Each Day of Delay, Financial Constraint is Not a Sufficient Reason
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Account for Each Day of Delay, The Office of the Attorney General Receive Reports Through Information,
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Affidavit from Another Person, Applicant Must Promptly Apply for Extension of Time
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Cannot Apply where the Avenue for Addressing the Illegality at the Lower Court are not Blocked
Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time, Delaying Tactics, Once is Accident, Twice is Coincidence, and Thrice is Deliberate
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown,
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Grounds for Extension of Time Must Be Stated in Notice of Motion, Extension of Time to File Extension
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient, Account for Each Day of the Delay, Rules of the Court Must Be Obeyed,
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient,
Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient, Factors for Extension of Time
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Interference with Discretional Powers, Dating Error On Judgment is Excusable Keyboard Mistake
Illegality as A Ground for Extension of Time
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Requirement to Account for Each Day of Delay
Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Single Justice Hearing an Application Should Refrain from Entertaining Substantive Issues
Illegality as a Ground for Restoration, Way Forward When a Party is Late to Entered Appearance in Court, Grant of Application for Restoration
Illegality as A Sole Ground for Extension of Time
ILLEGALITY AS A SOLE GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Illegality as Aground for Extension of Time, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Factors for Extension of Time
ILLEGALITY AS GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
ILLEGALITY AS GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME-IT CANNOT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHERE THERE IS SUFFICIENT FACTUAL JUSTIFICATION TO WARRANT GRANT OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME
Illegality, Account for Each Day of Delay, Factors for Extension of Time
Illegality, Technical Delay, Delaying Tactics, Second Bite is Not an Appeal, It is a New Battle, Factors for Extension of Time
IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, HOW CONFERRED, WAIVER OF IMMUNITY EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, WAIVER EX POST FACTO, PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND THEIR EFFICACY-JUDCIAL
IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, HOW CONFERRED, WAIVER OF IMMUNITY, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, WAIVER EX-POST FACTO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND THEIR EFFICACY, JUDICIAL
IMPORTANC OF SERVIVING THE RESPONDENT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL
IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS
IMPORTANT RULES WITH REGARD TO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED IN PLEADINGS
Improper Raising of PO Does Nothing but Unnecessarily Increase Costs, Service of the Notice of Appeal on the Respondent
In an Application for Extension of Time, The Applicant Has to Account for Each Day to The Delay
In an Application for Revision Initiated by a Party, The Party Must Attach a Copy of the Proceedings to the Notice of Motion
In Determining Whether the Suit is Time Barred the Court Has to Look on the Pleading, Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings
IN DISGUISE
In One Appeal There Cannot Co-Exist More Than One Certificates of Delay, No Two Certificates of Delay in One Appeal
IN ONE APPEAL THERE CANNOT CO-EXIST MORE THAN ONE CERTIFICATES OF DELAY
IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC STATUTORY PROVISION PROVINDING FOR THE RIGHT OF APPEAL, ONE CANNOT INVOKE ARTICLE 13(6) (a) OF THE CONSTITUTION
Inadvertence is Not Sufficient Cause for Extension of Time, Account for Each Day of Delay, Time Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
INCOMPETENT MATTERS CANNOT BE DISMISSED
INCOMPLETE RECORD OF APPEAL-FAILURE BY THE APPELLANT TO INCOPORATE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS IN THE RECORD OF APPEAL-LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL
INHERENT JURISDICTION, STATUTE CONTAINING SPECIFIC PROVISION UNDER WHICH THE COURT MAY BE MOVED TO TAKE A PARTICULAR ACTION, INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT SHOULD NOT BE INVOKED FOR SUCH
INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT CASES
INHERENT POWERS, COURT LOOKING AT RECORDS OR RECEIPT BOOK TO DETERMINE CORRECT DATE, WHETHER PROPER
INJUCTIVE RELIEF, PRAYER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE ABSENCE OF A SUIT PENDING IN COURT, WHETHER THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
INJUNCTION CASES
Institution of Civil Appeals to the Court of Appeal, Defective Certificate of Delay
INTERCUTORY ORDERS
INTEREST & COSTS CASES
INTERIM INJUNCTION, WHEN IT CAN BE GRANTED WITHOUT SERVING NOTICE ON THE RESPONDENT, ORDER 37 RULE 4
INTERIM ORDER, WHETHER COURT MAY GRANT AN INTERIM RESTORATION ORDER WHERE ITS JURISDICTION IS CHALLENGED, SECTION68 AND ORDER xxxvii
INTERISM EXPARTE ORDER
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE THE PARTIES AS USED UNDER RULE 65(6) OF THE CAT RULES
INTREST ON DAMAGES, WHETHER BANK RATE APPLICABLE
INVALID DECREE BEFORE THE HIGH COURT
INVOLMENT OF ASSESORS IN THE HIGH COURT (LAND DIVISION)
INVOLVEMENT OF ASSESORS IN THE DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL
Involvement of Assessors in The District Land and Housing Tribunal (DLHT)
Involvement of Assessors in the District Land and Housing Tribunal
Involvement of Assessors in The District Land and Housing Tribunal,
Involvement of Assessors in the District Land and Housing Tribunal, Precondition of Obtaining Leave Before Filing Any Representative Suit
Involvement of Assessors in The District Land and Housing Tribunal
Involvement of Assessors in The Land Tribunal for Zanzibar
Involvement of The Assessors in The High Court Land Division, Failure to Record the Opinion of Assessors
IRREGULARITIES OR NON-COMLIANCE WHICH DO NOT GO TO ROOT OR SUBSTANCE OF THE MATTER
IRREGULARITY IN PRIMARY COURT PROCEEDINGS, JUDGEMENT SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE ONLY AND NOT SIGNED BY ASSESSORS, WHETHER CURABLE
IRREGULARITY IN THE TRIAL PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER APPELLATE COURT MAY VARY OR ALTER THE DECISION SECTION 37(2) OF THE MAGISTRATE COURT ACT
ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF SUMMONS-ABSENCE OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF PROOF OF SERVICE
ISSUE NOT FRAMED AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE HEARING BUT PLEADED IN THE PLAINT AND EVIDENCE ADDUCED ON IT IN COURT
ISSUE OF JURISDICTION CAN BE RAISES AT REVIEW STAGE
ISSUE OVERTAKEN BY EVENTS, CONSEQUENCE THEREOF ORDER XXXVII RULE 2 OF THE CPC AND GN 508 OF 1991 AND SECTION 28 OF CHAPTER 129
Issues of Jurisdiction Must Be Determined First, An Issue Raised by The Parties Should Be Resolved, The Right to Be Heard
ISSUES
IT IS ONLY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS ARIGHT TO APPLY TO THE COURT TO BE JOINED AS AN INTERESTED PARTY IN THE INTENDED APPEAL IN A CASE HE WAS NOT A PARTY
IT IS THE DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO LODGE WITH THE COURT OF APPEAL RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS SOUGHT TO BE REVISED
IT IS THE DUTY OF THE COURT TO DETERMINE ISSUES BROUGHT BEFORE IT
J
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON APPEARANCE OF AN ADVOCATE TO THE DLHT
Joinder of a Necessary Party, Joinder of a Principal Debtor
Joinder of Causes of Action, Kadhi Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction on Matrimonial Disputes
JOINING THE GOVERNMENT AS A THIRD PARTY TO THE CASE
JUSTIFICATION OF THE DLHT TO ORDER THE MATTER TO PROCEED EX-PARTE OR TO DISMISS THE APPLICATION FOR A PARTY WHOSE ADVOCATE IS IN DEFAULT
JOINT MEMORANDUM NOT FILED BUT ALL FACTS DISPUTED IN THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS, WHETHER PROCEEDINGS WERE REGULAR
JUDGE IS OBLIGED TO DECIDE ON EACH AND EVERY ISSUE FRAMED
JUDGE ORDERS BILL OF COSTS TO BE PRESENTED BEFORE A TAXING OFFICER FOR TAXATION
JUDGE REVOKES AND REPLACES HIS EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT, WHETHER PROPER FOR A JUDGE TO DO, PRINCIPLE OF FUNCTUS OFFICIO
JUDGEMENT IN PERSONAM VS JUDGEMENT IN REM
JUDGEMENT TOO SCANTTY AND CONTAINED IN ONLY TWO SENTENCES, WHETHER MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT, CONTENT OF JUDGEMENT
JUDGMENT NOT SIGNED BY ASEESSORS CASES
Judgment on Admission, Framing of Issues, He Who Alleges Must Prove, Submissions Are Explanations, Assessment of General Damages
Judicial Service Commission is Vested with the Power of Terminating Employment of Judicial Officers, Corruption Case
JURIDICTION, WHEN THE ISSUE OF JURISDICTION CAN BE RAISED
JURISDICTION FOR REVIEW BY A JUDGE WHO MADE ORIGINAL DECISION SOGHT TO BE REVIEWED
Jurisdiction is the First Issue the Court Should Ask Itself, Parties Must be Heard on New Issue, Failure to File Written Submission
JURISDICTION ISSUE MUST BE APPARENT
JURISDICTION OF DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATES, WHETHER ONE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MAY OVERRULE ANOTHER DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
JURISDICTION OF PRIMARY COURTS OVER REGISTERED LAND INMATTERS OF PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL TO REVIEW ITS OWN DECISIONS
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT, WHETHER PARTIES MAY, BY AGREEMENT, CONFER JURISDICTION ON COURT
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS, CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN REPECT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY HELD UNDER CUSTOMARY LAW, WHETHER HIGH COURT HAS JURISDICTION SECTION2(1) OF HE JALA, SECTION 63(1) OF MCA
Jurisdiction of the Executing Court, A Summary Dismissal
JURISDICTION OF THE PRIMARY COURT IN PROBATE MATTERS INVOLVING CHRISTIANS
Jurisdiction of the Primary Court to Appoint Administrators of Estates, Factors to Consider, Definition of Interest in the Deceased Estate
JURISDICTION SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT, WHETHER GRNATING CERTIORARY ON GROUNDS OF ERROR OF LAW AMOUNTS TO HEARING AN APPEAL FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, APPEAL AND
JURISDICTION. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS CASES
JURISDICTION
JUSTICES OF THE CAT HAVE NO POWER TO POKE THEIR NOISES INTO THE RECORD OF THE HIGH COURT
JOINING A PARTY IN AN APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION WHILE HE WAS NOT A PARTY TO PREVIOUS PROCEEDINGS-JOINDER OF NECESSARY PARTY
K
L
LAWS GGOVERNING APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
Lack of Proof of Service, The Law Governing Issuance and Service of Summons, Right to be Heard, MARY MCHOME MBWAMBO
LIMITATION OF MINISTER POWER TO EXTENDING TIME
LIMITATIONS ON APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT AT THE DHLT
The Law on Affidavits and Verification Clauses
Lack of Proof Service, Reason to Set Aside Ex-Parte Judgement
Lacunae in CPC
Law and Principles Governing Review, A Party is Not Restricted to Execute a Decree by Any Particular Mode, Decree Can be Attached, A Nullity Decision
Law Governing Acquisition of Lands, Person with Certificate of Title is the Owner, Valuation for Compensation of the Land, Indefeasibility Principle
LAWS GOVERNING APPEALS TO THE CAT FROM THE HIGH COURT
LEAVE CO DEFENDANT NOT GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINE WITNESSES AND TO DEFEND HIMSELF AGAINST THE SUIT, A DENIAL OF JUSTICE
LEAVE CO DEFENDANT NOT GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINE WITNESSES AND TO DEFEND HIMSELF AGAINST THE SUIT, A DENIAL OF JUSTICE
LEAVE GRANTED BY THE HIGH COURT OUTSIDE PRESCRIBED PERIOD
Leave to Appeal in Land Matters, A Second Bite Application for Leave to Appeal Must Be Filed Within 14 Days
Leave to Appeal in Land Matters, The Law Before 2018
LEAVE TO APPEAL IN LAND MATTERS-THE LAW BEFORE 2018
LEAVE TO APPEAL REFUSED BY HIGH COURT
LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL CASES
LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
LEAVE TO APPEAL, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, APPLICATION TO BE MADE TO THE HIGH COURT FIRST
LEAVE TO DEFEND A SUIT CASES
LEAVE TO DEFEND A SUMMARY SUIT, ORAL APPLICATION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT BY AN ADVOCATE RECENTLY INTRUCTED ORDER xxxv RULE 3 AND ORDER XIL RULE 2 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL CANNOT BE GRANTED TWICE -EXTENSION OF TIME THE SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD
Leave to File Supplementary Record, Service of the Letter Requesting for Proceedings is Within 30 Days
LEAVE TO REVOKE A SUBMIT TO ARBITRATION
LEAVE TO THE APPELLANT TO LODGE A SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL TO INCLUDE OMITTED DOCUMENTS
LEGAL CONSEQUENCE OF LODGE APPEAL; OUT OF TIME
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES IN THE EVENT THE SCHEDULED SPEED TRACK EXPIRES-ORDER VIIIA OF THE CPC
LEGAL ISSUES ON APPEAL, WHETHER A LEGAL ISSUE NOT RAISED AT THE TRIAL MAY BE RAISED ON APPEAL
LEGAL PRINCIPLES WHICH GOVERN APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE
Letter Requesting Documents for Appeal Must Be Filed Within 30 Days, A Time Barred Appeal Cannot Be Remedied by Overriding Objective Principle,
LETTER TO THE REGISTRAR ASKING FOR PROCEEDINGS
LIMITATION OF TIME FOR SUITS, COMPUTATION OF TIME OF LIMITATION FOR A SUIT PREVIOUSLY, ITEM 34 AND 52 OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE LAW OF LIMITATION
LIMITATION OF TIME TO APPEAL, COMPUTATION OF TIME, TIME SPENT TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE DECREE OR ORDER
LIMITATION OF TIME TO APPEAL, PERIOD OF THIRTY EIGHT DAYS PASSES FROM DATE OF RECEIPT OF COPY OF JUDGEMENT
LIMITATION OF TIME TO LODGE AN APPEAL, COMPUTATION OF TIME IN WHICH AN APPEAL MAY BE LODGED, POINT AT WHICH TIME STARTS TO RUN
LIMITATION OF TIME, CONSEQUENCES THEREOF, HIGH COURT FINDS THAT AN APPLICATION FILED WAS TIME BARRED, WHETHER SUCH APPLICATION MAY BE DISMMISSED OR STRUCK OUT
LIMITATION ON THE MINISTERS POWER OF EXTENDING PERIOD OF LIMITATION
LIMITATION PERIOD IN RESPECT OF APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION IN COURT OF APPEAL, REASONABLE TIME WITHIN WHICH TO APPLY
LIMITATION, ACKNOWLWDGEMENT OF TIME BARRED DEBT AND PROMISE TO PAY IT
LIMITATION, QUESTION OF LIMITATION AND JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT NOT RAISED AT THE TRIAL AND THE COURT OF THE FIRST INSTANCE DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON IT
LITIGANT DOUBTING AS COUNSEL FOR HIMSELF, WHETHER ACCORDS AND ACCEPTED PRACTICE
Litigation Must Come to an End, Account for Each Day of Delay, Factors for Extension of Time,
LOCUS STANDI CASES
LOCUS STANDI IN SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION TO RESTORE THE SUIT
Locus Standi, Litigant can never benefit from his own wrongs -land-appeal-no-
LOCUS STANDI
LODGING OF PLEADINGS, TIME PRESCRIBED FOR LODGING WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE
LOST FILE
M
Mareva injunction
MEANING OF PLEADING-PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THEIR PLEADINGS AND THAT ANY EVIDENCE PRODUCED BY ANY OF PARTIES WHICH DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PLEADED FACTS OR IS VARIANCE WITH PLEADED FACTS MUST BE IGNORED
MANIFEST ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF RECORD AS A GROUND FOR REVIEW
MINISTER’S POWER TO EXTEND TIME
Manifest Error On the Face of Record as A Ground Foe Review, No Appeal or Revision Lies Against Interlocutory Decision
MANIFEST OR APPARENT ERROR ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD
MATTER NOT PLEADED OR TAKEN IN THE TRIAL COURT, WHETHER THE MATTER CAN BE RAISED ON APPEAL
MATTER NOT PLEADED
MATTER REFEREED TO THE HIGH COURT BY RESIDENT MAGISTRATE WITHOUT ANY OPINION BY THE MAGISTRATE ON ANY DOUBTFUL QUESTION OF LAW, WHETHER THE MATTER IS CORRECTLY REFERRED TO THE HIGH COUR
Matters for reference to arbitration- contract requiring all matters referred to arbitration to be reffered first to Engineer
MATTERS REFFERRED TO ARBITRATOR WITHOUT FIRST REFERRING THEM TO ENGINEER AND WHETHER ARBITRATOR HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN THEM
Meaning of Costs to follow the Event- Attachment of a Judgment or Decree in a Taxation Cause
MEANING OF JUDGEMENT
MEANING OF PLEADING-AN ORDINARY SUIT IS INITIATED BY FILING IN COURT A PLAINT-MEANING OF A PLAINT
MEANING OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTION, TESTS OF WHAT CONSTITUTES A PRELIMINARY OBJECTION
MEANING OF REGISTRAR, WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF THE LART TRIBUNAL IS ALSO REGISTRAR UNDER THE COURT OF APPEAL RULES
MEDIATION PROCESS, ORDER FOR COSTS MAY BE MADE AGAINST DEFAULTING OR UNPREPARED PARTY UNLESS EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUSTANCES , ORDER 84 RULE 5 OF CPC
Mediator of the CMA Has No Jurisdiction to Proceed Ex-parte, Procedure Governing Labour Dispute Resolution, Mediation Must be Completed with 30 Days,
MEMORANDUM OF APEAL ACCOMPANIED BY DECREE NOT AN ORDER, WHETHER THE APPEAL IS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COURT
MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED WITHOUT ATTACHING TO IT A CERTFIED COPY OF THE DECREE APPEALED AGAINST
MEMORANDUM OF REVIEW
MEMORANDUM SOULD ACCOMPANINED BY DECREE NOT ORDER
MINISTER’S POWER TO EXTEND PERIOD OF LIMITATION
MISJOINDER OF PARTIES, MEANING OF PROPER PARTY AND NECESSARY PARTY
MISSING RECORD
N
NATURE OF SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL
NO NOTICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF JUDGEMENT ON ADMISSION
NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
NATURAL JUSTICE CASES
NEED AND TIME TO FILKE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Negligence of Advocate is Not a Good Ground, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Technical Delay as a Ground,
Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet, No One Can Give a Title That He Does Not Have, Conditions to Prove Adverse Possession, Public Document
New Complaints Cannot Be Raised in Written Submissions, Appeals from DLHT to High Court is by Way of Petition, Matters Not Raised in Lower Court
NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
No Appeal Lies Against Interlocutory Order, Definition of Suit
No Appeal Lies Against Interlocutory Order
No Appeal Lies Against Interlocutory Orders
NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST THE DECISION REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
No Appeals Against Intercullatory Order Unless Has Effect of Finalise the Suit, Abuse of Court Process is Not Allowed
No Instructions No Representation, Advocate Cannot Prosecute a PO on Behalf of a Party Who is Not His Client, Two Certificates of Delay
NO JUDGEMENT CAN BE BEYOND CRITICISM-NOT EVERY ERROR WILL JUSTIFY A REVIEW
No Judgment is Perfect, A Point Law Cannot Be Divorced from the Facts, Abstract, Distinction Between a Question of Law and a Question of Fact
No Judgment of the Court Can Attain Perfection
No Need to Attach Any Document in an Application for Reference, Procedure for Initiating an Application for Reference,
No Omnibus Application
NO PRELIMINARY OBJECTION WILL BE FROM ABSTRACTS WITHOUT REFERENCE TO SOME FACTS PLAIN ON THE PLEADINGS OR RECORD OF APPEAL
NON DISCLOSING CAUSE OF ACTION, DEFENDANT HAVING A DEFENCE TO EACH ALLEGATION RAISED IN THE PLAINT, WHETHER THAT MEANS THERE IS NON DISCLOSURE OF CAUSE OF ACTION
NON JOINDER OF PARTIES, WHETHER AN ESSENTIAL PARTY NOT JOINED TO AN ACTION MAY BE JOINED AT THE STAGE OF FORMULATING THE JUDGEMENT
Non-Appearance of the Plaintiff, the Suit Shall be Dismissed Not Struck Out, the Remedy is to Apply to Set Aside the Dismissal Order Not Fresh Suit
Non-Compliance Which Do Not Go to The Root of the Matter Can Be Overlooked, Defective Certificate of Delay
Non-Inclusion in the Record of Appeal the Letter of the Registrar Notifying the Appellant That the Requested Documents Are Ready for Collection
Non-Inclusion in the Record of Appeal the Letter of the Registrar Notifying the Appellant that the Requested Documents Are Ready for Collection,
Non-Inclusion in the Record of Appeal the Letter of the Registrar, When the Appeal is Struck Out, So the Notice of Appeal, Informal Collection of Documents,
NOT APPEALLABLE TO THE HIGH COURT, REVISIONAL POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT
Not Every Dispute Can Be Determined by BAKWATA, Any Person Can Inquire in Court the Status of Any Member of Body Corporate, No PO from Abstracts
NOTICE OF ADDRESS, FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF ADRESS
NOTICE OF ADMISSION OF CASE
NOTICE OF ADMISSION OF DEBT, JUDGEMENT ON ADMISSION
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT, EFFECT OF LOGING A NOTICE OF APPEAL ON THE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT, WHETHER THE HIGH COURT STILL HAS JURISDICTION OVER A MATT
NOTICE OF APPEAL LODGED AFTER THE DECISION IS MADE BUT BEFORE THE REASONS FOR THE DECISION ARE GIVEN, WHETHER THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS LEGALLY COMPETENT
Notice of Appeal Must Be Filed Within 30 Days, Not Necessary for a Copy of the Judgment to Accompany the Notice of Appeal
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO BE FILED IN THE HIGH COURT
NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL WAS SERVED SEVEN DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOTICE OF MOTION CITING A WRONG OR NON-EXIST PROVISION OF LAW, WHETHER VALID
NOTICE OF MOTION CITING A WRONG OR NON-EXIST PROVISION OF LAW, WHETHER VALID
NOTICE OF MOTION, FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF MOTION THE RESPONDENT TWO CLEAR DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, EFFECT THEREOF
NOTICE TO SUE GOVERMENT, REQUIREMENT OF
O
ONCE THE MATTERS IS STRUCK OUT, IT IS AS IF NOTHING WAS FILED IN COURT, THE COURT CANNOT BE FUNCTUS OFFICIO
ONCE AL PARTIES ARE BEFORE THE COURT FOR HEARING OF A MATTER WHICH WAS PARTLY SOUGHT TO PROCEED EX-PARTE AND AFTERWARDS INTER-PARTIE, THE COURT SHOULD PROCEEDINTER-PARTIES
OBLIGATION OF THE CAT IN THE SECOND BITE APPLICATIONS
ORDER REFUSING TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE JUDGMENTS
OBJECTION PROCEEDINGS, DUTY OF THE COURT IN OBJECTION PROCEEDINGS
OBJECTION TO THE JURISDICTION OF ARBITATOR
OBLIGATION TO FRAME ISSUES-AMENDEMENT OF THE FRAMED ISSUES-THE PURPOSE IF FRAMING ISSUES-THE COURT IS DUTY BOUND TO DECIDE ON EACH AND EVERY ISSUE FRAMED
OMMISION TO TO CITE PROVISION UNDER WHICH OBJECTION IS BROUGHT IS FATAL
ONCE A NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL HAVE BEEN DULY LODGED, THE HIGH COURT CEASES TO HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTER
Once an Appeal is Lodged in a Superior Court, The Subordinate Court Lacks the Prerequisite Jurisdiction to Entertain the Matter
Once is Accident, Twice is Coincidence and Thrice is Deliberate, Technical Delay, Revision is Not Alternative To Appellate Jurisdiction
One Cannot Be Allowed to Lodge Supplementary Record of Appeal Twice, Failure to Indicate the Proper Case Number is Curable
One Cannot Be Allowed to Ride Two Horses at The Same Time, The Doctrine of Res-Subjudice,
online date is the date of filing
OPINION OF ASSESSORS IN PRIMARY COURT
ORDER ADVESERLY AFFECTS THE APPLICANT WHO WAS NOT A PARTY TO THE SUIT AND NOT HEARD BEFORE
ORDER IX RULE 6 OF THE CPC WHETHER IT APPLIES ONLY WHEN THE SUIT IS CALLED FOR HEARING ON THE FIRST OCCASION ORDER XVII, RULE 2
ORDER OF ATTACHEMENT AND SALE OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE JUDGEMENT DEBTOR AND A THIRD PARTY, WHETHER THE PROPERTY MAY BE ATTACHED
ORDER TO PROCEED EXPARTE
OUSTER OF STATUTORY PROVSIONS BY CASE LAW, PROCEDURE OF RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS, THE VIENNA CONVENTION
OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE PRINCIPLE
P
PROCEDURE FOR SET ASIDE EXPERTE JUDGMENT
POSITION WHERE THE DEFENDANT WANT TO CHALLENGE BOTH THE ORDER TO PROCEED AND MERIT OF FINDINGS OF EXPARTE JUDGMENT
POSITION WHERE THE DEFENDANT WANT TO CHALLENGE BOTH THE ORDER TO PROCEED AND MERIT OF FINDINGS OF EXPARTE JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION SHOULD NOT BE VAGUE
PROOF OF ATTENDANCE TO A SUPERIOR COURT BY AN ADVOCATE WHO HAS A MATTER BEFORE THE DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL
PROCEDURE FOR INITIATING AN APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
POWER OF THE JUDGE ON APPEAL TO RAISE ANY MATTER SUO MOTU-PARTIES MUST BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD
PARLIAMENTARY IMMUNITY, EFFECT OF GRANT OF CERTIFICATE OF JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
PARREL SUITS BETWEEN SAME PARTIES IN THE SAME ISSUE
PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE SUBMISSION TO DISPUTE SETTEMENT AGREED UPON BY THEM
Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings, Court Cannot Grant Reliefs Not Prayed For, He Who Alleges Must Prove, Principle of Adverse Inference
Parties Are Bound by Their Pleadings, The Quantum of Compensation for Unfair Termination, Prior Consultation On the Impending Redundancy,
PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THEIR PLEADINGS
PARTIES CANNOT DURING TRIAL DEPART FROM PLEADINGS
PARTIES GRANTED LEAVE TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS ON POINTS OF LAW ONLY INSTEAD OF CALLING WITNESSES
Parties in the Proceedings Should at Any Given Time Appear as They Did in the Previous Proceedings, Change of the Names of a Party
Parties Right to Raise Concerns During the Hearing
PARTY CLAIMING SPECIAL DAMAGES WITHOUT PROOF OF DAMAGE SUFFERED IN BUSINESSES THAT HAVE NO CONNECTION WITH THE PURPOSE OF THE OVERDRAFT FACILITY
PARTY CLAIMING SPECIAL DAMAGES WITHOUT PROOF OF DAMAGE SUFFERED
PECUNIARY JURISDICTION, DETERMINATION OF PECUNIARY JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS, WHETHER GENERAL DAMAGES ERRONEOUSLY QUANTIFIED MAY AFFECT THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
PERIOD WITHIN WHICH TO LODGE AN APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
PETITION AGAINST CITY CASES
PETITION INCOMPETENT BECAUSE NOT ACCOMPANIED BY ORIGINATING SUMMONS
PLAINT NOT DISCLOSING A CAUSE OF ACTION AND PLAINTIFF NOT HAVING A CAUSE OF ACTION, DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO
PLEA OF GUILTY, WHETHER AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES A CONVICTION ON AN ACCUSED PERSON’S OWN PLEAD OF GUILTY IS APPLICABLE, SECTION 360(1) OF THE CPA
PLEADED CASE WAS AN WRONGFUL RETIREMENT WHILE APPELLANT WAS UNDER INTERDICTION
PLEADING STATING A SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF GENERAL DAMAGES PRAYED FOR, WHETHER PROPER
PLEADINGS DOES NOT DISCLOSING CAUSE OF ACTION
Pleadings for Suits by or Against Companies Must Be Signed and Verified by the Secretary or Director or Other Principal Officer
PLEADINGS, FINAL SUBMSSIONS NOT CONFINED TO PLEADINGS, WHETHER PROPER
PO Must Be Determined First, Once a PO is Raised, it Must Be Determined First Before the Substantive Case is Heard and Determined
PO Must Be Determined First, Power to Direct a Departure from The Rules, Dispense with the Service, Power of HC Commercial to Control PTC
POINT OF LAW RAISED AT APPELLATE LEVEL
POWER OF RESIDENT MAGISTRATE TO EXTEND TIME TO APPEAL
POWER OF REVISION, CONDITIONS FOR INVOLKING THE COURT’S POWER OF REVISION, SECTION4 OF AJA
POWER TO INTERFERE WITH CONCURRENT FINDINGS
POWER TO REVIEW DECISIONS WHICH ORIGINATES FROM THE PRIMARY COURT
POWERS OF THE CAT TO REVIEW ITS OWN DECISIONS
POWERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL TO COMMENCE REVISIONAL PROCEEDINGS ON ITS OWN IS NOT TIME BOUND
POWERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL TO STAY A DECREE OR AN ORDER OF ANY COURT SUBORDINATE TO THE HIGH COURT
Powers of the Court of Appeal to Stay Execution of a Decree or an Order of Any Court Subordinate to the High Court, Conditions for Stay
POWERS OF THE COURT TO MAKE ORDERS THE HIGH COURT SHOULD HAVE MADE, APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT
POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT TO GRANT LEAVE FOR PROCEDINGS TO COMMENCE IN A COURT OTHER THAN THE PRIMARY COURT, WHETHER HIGH COURT MAY ORDER PROCEEDINGS TO COMMENCE IN ITSELF SECTION 63(1)
POWERS OF THE JUDGE TO INTERFERE WITH QUESTIONS OF QUANTUM OF COSTS
Powers of the Village Council to Allocate Village Land, Illegalities Must Be Apparent On the Face of Record, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts
POWERS TO RE-EVALUATE EVIDENCE TAKEN BY TRIAL COURT AND TO MAKE FACTUAL FINDINGS THEREFROM, APPELLATE COURT CAN MAKE FACTUAL FINDINGS BASED ON A DOCUMENTS NOT ADDUCED AT THE TRIAL
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION BASED ON THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IS A POINT OF LAW
Preliminary Objection Must Be on Pure Point of Law, There Can Be No Pure Point of Law Where There Are Facts That Require Proof by Evidence
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION SHOULD NOT CONTAIN LAW AND FACTS
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION(S) CANNOT BE ANSWERED BY ANOTHER PRELIMINARY OBJECTION
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION, CONTENTS THEREOF
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION
PRESERVATORY MEASURES, WHETHER JUDGEMENT FOR MONETARY PAYMENTS IS A PRESERVATORY MEASURE
PRESERVATORY MEASURES, WHETHER MAY BE MADE IN THE ABSENCE OF A SUIT
PRESUMPTION THAT A FOREIGN JUDGEMENT WAS MADE BY A COURT OF COMPETETNT JUDISCTION SECTION 9 OF THE CPC
PRIMARY COURT MAY ACCEPT EVIDENCE APPEARS TO BE WORTHLY
PRIMARY COURTS, CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN PRIMARY COURTS, NON APPERANCE BY CO-DEFENDANTS AT THE HEARING, CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH NON APPERANCE, RULE 26(1) OF THE PRIMARY COURTS CIVIL PROCEDURE
Principles Governing Application for Review, Review of the High Court Judgement
Principles Governing Reference, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, The Award of Costs Follow the Event
Principles Governing Reference
Principles Governing References, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time
Principles Governing References, The Applicant Must Provide Sufficient Information to Enable the Court in Determining an Application
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING REVIEW
PRINCIPLES OF LAW EXTRACTED FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL CASES
PRINCIPLES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT WHEN CONSIDERATING SUCH APPLICATION
Priority Principle, Double Allocation, Effect of the Withdrawal of the Objection
PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION PROCEEDINGS, WHERE SECTION 53(b) APPLIED, WHETHER NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS CHANGES INTO SUIT
PROCEDURAL LAW LACKING IN SOME MATERIAL PARTICULAR, WHETHER PROCEURE OBTAINING IN COMPARABLE JURISDICTION MAY BE ADOPTED, WHETHER VARIATION OF ADOPTED PROCEDURE IS PERMISSIBLE
PROCEDURAL LAW LACKING IN SOME MATERIAL PARTICULAR, WHETHER VARAIATION OF ADOPTED PROCEDURE IS PERMISSIBLE
Procedural Requirements in Relation to Institution of the Appeal Before the Court of Appeal
PROCEDURE CASES
PROCEDURE FOR INITIATING APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE
PROCEDURE GOVERNING A VISIT TO THE LOCUS IN QUO
Procedure in Joining the Legal Representative in Place of the Deceased, Effect of Non-Joinder of the Administrator
Procedure of Joining Legal Representative as A Party to the Case, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Illegality by Itself is Sufficient
PROCEDURE WHERE ONE OF SEVERAL PLAINTIFFS DIES AND RIGHT TO SUE SURVIVES-THE APPLICABILITY OF ORDER XXII RULE 3(1) and 2 of THE CPC
Proceeding with Execution Despite the Grant of the Ex Parte Order of Stay of Execution,
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST A CORPORATE BODY, COURT ACTION AGAINST THE DECISION OF A MEETING OF AN ORGAN OF A COOPRATIVE UNION, WHETHER PROCEEDINGS MAY BE INSTITUTED AGAINST THAT PARTICULAR ORG
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE WARD TRIBUNAL, APPEAL TO THE PRIMARY, SECTION 20(1) OF THE WARD TRIBUNAL ACT
PROOF OF FRAUD IN CIVIL CASES
PROOF OF MATTERS OF BOTH FACT AND LAW, CONSEL PRAY FOR AND ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO SUBMIT ON POINTS OF LAW ONLY INSTEAD OF CALLING WITNESSES
Proof of matters of both fact and law, counsel pray for and are granted leave to submit on points of law only instead of calling witness
Proving or establishing a case, Parties granted leave to make submissions on points of law only instead of calling witnesses, Proof of matters of both fact and law,
Proving or establishing a case, Parties granted leave to make submissions on points of law only instead of calling witnesses, Proof of matters of both fact and law,
Q
R
REMEDY AGAINST THE ORDER DISMISSING AN APPLICATION UNDER REGULATION 13(2) of GN No 174 OF 2003
Refusal of certificate on point of law by HC is final and conclusive
RIGHT TO APPEAL AAGAINST EXPERTE JUDGMENT IS AUTOMATIC ONE
REQUEREMENT OF ATTACHING DOCUMENT ( S) IN APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE
RIGHT TO APPEAL AAGAINST EXPERTE JUDGMENT IS AUTOMATIC ONE
Proving or establishing a case, Parties granted leave to make submissions on points of law only instead of calling witnesses, Proof of matters of both fact and law,
Reason for The Court to Grant an Application for Restoration, Sickness as a Ground for Restoration
REASONS TO BE SICLOSED FOR REQUESTING THE COURT TO DISPENSE WITH SERVICE OF NOTICE, ORDER 37
REASONS TO BE SICLOSED FOR REQUESTING THE COURT TO DISPENSE WITH SERVICE OF NOTICE, ORDER 37
Reception of Evidence in the CMA, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath
Reception of Evidence in The CMA, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath
Reception of Evidence in The CMA, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath, Failure to Append Signature in Proceedings, the CMA is a Court
Reception of Evidence in the CMA, Evidence Must Be Taken Under Oath
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE TO CONSTITUTE A FULL BENCH OF THE COURT TO DELIBERATE ON SOME PETRINENT ISSUES
RECORD AND MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL NOT ENDORSED BY THE REGISTRAR TO SIGNIFY THEIR LODGEMENT, EFFECT THEREOF,
RECORD OF APPEAL, RECORD OF APPEAL BEING INCOMPLETE, WHAT STEPS A PARTY MAY TAKE
REFERENCE BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL, APPLICATION IS CURABLE UNDER 107A(2)(e) of the Constitution
REFERENCE FROM DECISION OF SINGLE JUDGE
REFERENCE TO THE HIGH COURT
REFERENCE, PROCEDURE FOR FILLING, WHETHER A WRITTEN APPLICATION MUST BE SUPPORTED BY AFFIDAVIT
Registrar Has No Jurisdiction to Grant Leave to Appeal, Decision Dismissing Application for Extension of Time in Judicial Review, Is Appealable with Leave
RELEVANT FOR THE DETERMINATION OF APPEAL
Remedies for Breach of Contract, Loss of Expected Profits Falls Under the Category of Special Damages Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved,
Remedy Against a Default Judgment of High Court Commercial is to Set It Aside, Application for Extension of Time and Setting Aside a Default Judgment
REMEDY WHEN TACATION CAUSES ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BY REGISTRARS
REPRESENTATION BY RELATIVE MEMBER IN PRIMARY COURTS, PERSON REPRESENT THE OTHERS ADDUCED HEARSAY EVIDENCE
REPRESENTATIVE SUIT, LAW GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS OF A CIVIL NATURE IN PRIMARY COURTS, WHETHER THAT LAW MAKES PROVISION FOR REPRESENTAIVE SUITS,
REPRESENTATIVE SUIT, WHETHER THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS FOR REPRESENTATIVE SUIT APPLY TO THE DEFENCE
REPRESENTATIVE SUITS CASES
REQUEST FOR THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR APPEAL PURPOSES FROM THE REGISTRAR-WITHIN 30DAYS FROM THE DATE OF DECISION TO BE CHALLENGED
REQUIREEMENT OF LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
REQUIREMENT OF A CERTIFICATE OF DELAY WHERE AN APPEAL INVOLVES LEAVE TO APPEAL
REQUIREMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR EACH DAY OF DELAY
REQUIREMENTS OR PRINCIPLES TO BE CONTAINED IN APPLICATION FOR EXPARTE
RES JUDICATA, ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS FOR APPLICATION OF THE PLEA OF RES JUDICATA
RES JUDICATA, ISSUE DECIDED IN PREVIOUS CASE WAS WHETHER THE FIRST RESPONDENT HAD BEEN SERVED WITH NOTICE OF APPEAL, ISSUE IN SUBSEQUENT CASE IS WHETHER THE APPLICANT HONESTLY BELIVED
RES JUDICATA. SUB .JUDICE CASES
RES JUDICATA
RES JUDICATA-LEADING CASE-PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE
RESPONDENT ALLEGES NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS NOT SERVED IN TIME
RESPONDENT AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ORIGINAL RESPONDENT, WHETHER HE COULD BE MADE A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT THE LEAVE OF THE COURT
RETRIAL PRINCIPLES
REVIEW CASES
REVIEW IS BY NO MEANS AN APPEAL IN DISGUISE
Review is Not an Appeal in Disguise, Manifest Error on the Face of Record, Grounds for Review
REVIEW IS NOT AN APPEAL IN DISGUISE
REVIEW IS NOT ANA APPEAL
REVIEW POWERS, CIRCUSTANCES IN WHICH COURT APPEAL MAY REVIEW ITS OWN DECISION, WHETHER LIST OF SUCH CIRCUSTANCES IS CLOSED
REVIEW POWERS, CONDITION PRECEDENT FOR INVOKING REVIEW POWERS OF THE COURT
REVIEW POWERS, FULL BENCH OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, CIRCUSTANCES IN WHICH ONLY THE FULL BENCH MAY EXERCISE REVIEW POWERS
REVIEW POWETS, BENCH OF THREE JUDGES, WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEAL CONSISTING OF THREE JUSTICES MAY EXTEND THE LIST OF CIRCUSTANCES FOR REVIEW BEYOND THOSE STATED BY THE FULL BENCH
REVIEW, APPLICATION FOR REVIEW NOT ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE DRAWN ORDER SOUGHT TO BE REVIEWED, WHETHER FATAL TO THE APPLICATION
Review, Burden of Proof in Constructive Termination, Burden of Proof in Labour Matters, Grounds for Review, FABRICE EZAOVI v. KOBIL TANZANIA
REVIONAL JURISDICTION, MAY BE EXERCISED WHERE THE APPELLATE PROCESS HAS BEEN BLOCKED BY JUDICIAL PROCESS, WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEAL RULES AMOUNT TO A JUDICIAL BLOCK
Revision Against Interlocutory Decisions, No Revision Lies Against Interlocutory Decisions
REVISION CASES
Revision is Not an Alternative to an Appeal, Not Every Non-Appealable Order is Subject to Revision
Revision is Not an Alternative to Appeal
Revision is Not an Alternative to Appeal, Failure to File Affidavit in Reply, Failure to File Counter Affidavit
Revision is Not an Alternative to Appeal, Four Tests to Consider for the Court to Exercise Revisionary Powers
Revision is Not an Appeal in Disguise, Revision is Not an Alternative to Review, A PO Must Be Determined First
Revision is the Remedy Against the Decision of the High Court Rejecting the Application for Review, Grounds for Review, Scope of Review
Revision is the Remedy Where the Proceedings and Ruling of the High Court Are Tainted with Confusion
REVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPAEAL
REVISION SOUGHT IN MATTER THAT CAN BE APPEALED AGAINST, WHETHER REVISIONSL JURISDICTION MAY BE INVOKED
REVISIONAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL-CONDITIONS WHICH MUST BE FULFILLED TO MOVE THE COURT OF APPEAL TO EXERCISE ITS REVISIONARY JURISDICTION
REVISIONAL POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 79(1) OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, APPLICATION RAISING MATTERS PROPER IN AN APPEAL, WHEN AN APPLICATION FOR REVISION SHOULD BE MADE
REVISIONAL POWERS, SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES IN THE THREE COURTS BELOW
REVISIONAL PROCEEDINGS, JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT TO REVISE INTERLOCUTORY EX-PARTE ORDER
REVISIONSL POWERS OF THE HIGH COURT, APPLICANT FOR REVISION RISING SUBSTANTIAL ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION WHICH CAN COME ONLY BY WAY OF APPEAL, WHETHER REVISION POWERS MAY BE EXERCISED
REVOCATION OF CLAUSE FOR SUBMISSION TO ARBITRATION
Right to be Heard Has Exceptions, Failure to Invite Parties to Address the Issue Raised by Court While Composing Judgement, Principles Governing Review
RIGHT TO BE HEARD IS NOT ACHIEVED MERELY BY JOINING ON THE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
RIGHT TO BE HEARD, PLANTIFF GRANTED A PRAYER FOR INTERIM INJUCTIVE ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT,
RIGHT TO BE HEARD
RIGHT TO COUNSEL, RIGHT OF A PARTY TO DISMISS COUNSEL, DUTY OF JUDGE ON AN APPLICATION BY A PARTY TO DISMISS ADVOCATE
RIGHT TO REASONS FROM A DECISON MAKER
RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF PARTIES TO APPEAL RELATING TO SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND EFFECT THEREOF
RULES OF COURT MUST BE OBEYED
RULING OR ORDER CASES
RULING PRINCIPLES GUIDING COURT IN GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, WHATHER COURT MAY GRANT INJUNCTION IN BREACH OF EXPRESS CONTRACTUAL TERMS IN A LENDING AGREEMENT
Running of the Limitation Period Where a Party Writes to the Registrar Asking for Missing Part(s) of the Proceedings, MEHBOOB HASSANALI VERSI
RUNNING OF THE LIMITATION PERIOD WHERE PARTY WRITES TO THE REGISTRAR ASSKING FOR MISSING PART (S) OF THE PROCEEDINGS
S
SUIT DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE AMOUNTS TO DECREE
SUIT INSTITUTED BEYOND PRESCRIBED LIMITATION PERIOD
SOME ORDER AMOUNTS TO DECREE
STATUS OF DOCUMENT THAT LACK SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL
SERVICE OF SUPPLIMENTARY RECORD OF APPEAL
STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLEADINGS UPON AMENDMENTS
second appeal over concurrent findings of lower tribunals, courts will be reluctant in interfering with such concurrent findings.
SETTING ASIDE THE DISMISSAL ORDER IN AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SET ASIDE DISMISSAL ORDER, IS FATAL-DETERMINING THE MATTER WHICH IS NOT BEFORE THE COURT IS FATAL
Sale Agreement Without Stamp Duty
SAME COURT PRONONCES TWO JUDGEMENTS IN THE SAME CASE, WHETHER TRIAL WAS REGULAR AND VAILD
SANCITY OF A COURT RECORD-THERE IS ALWAYS A PRESUMPTION THAT A COURT RECORD ACCURATELY REPRESENTS WHAT HAPPENDED
SANCTITY OF A COURT RECORD-THERE IS ALWAYS A PRESUMPTION THAT A COURT RECORD ACCURATELY REPRESENTS WHAT HAPPENED
Sanctity of Court Record, Affidavit from Another Person to Support Allegations, Principles Governing Reference
Sanctity of Court Record, Illegality as a Ground for Extension of Time, Factors for Extension of Time,
Sanctity of Court Record, One Cannot Disown His Advocate After Losing the Case, Illegality
Sanctity of the Contract, Parties Are Bound by Their Agreements, Kesi ya Riba, Concurrent Findings of the Lower Courts Cannot Be Interfered
SANCTIVITY OF COURT RECORDS
second appeal over concurrent findings of lower tribunals, courts will be reluctant in interfering with such concurrent findings.
SECOND APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT, ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT TAKEN ON APPEAL SECTION 29 OF THE MAGISTRATE COURTS aCT
Second Bite, Where Extension of Time is Refused by the HC, the Same Must be in the CA, The Appellant Should Approach an Advocate for Legal Advice
Security as A Condition for Stay of Execution, A Property in Dispute Cannot Be Furnished as A Security
Security as a Condition for Stay of Execution
Security as a Condition for Stay of Execution, Conditions for Stay of Execution, Waiver of Security
Security as a Condition for Stay of Execution, Shares as Security, Shares in the Company are an Acceptable Security
Security as a Condition for Stay of Execution, Where the Impugned Decree is Not Monetary
SECURITY AS CONDITION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
SECURITY FOR COSTS CASES
SERVANT IN THE EXECUTIVE AGENCIES AND GOVERMENT INSTITUTION ARE GOVERNED BY THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT
Service Fee Paid to Non-Resident is Liable to Withholding Tax, the Full Bench Has Jurisdiction to Depart from Previous Decision
Service of a Notice of Appeal as a Ground to Strike Out a Notice of Appeal, Service of the Letter Requesting for Proceedings
SERVICE OF MEMEORANDUM OF APPEAL AND RECORD OF APPEAL
SERVICE OF NOTICE OF MOTION ON THE RESPONDENT, TIME WITHIN WHICH THE RESPONDENT IS BE SERVED WITH A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
SERVICE OF RECORD OF APPEAL, RECORD OF APPEAL SERVED ON ADAULT MEMBER OF THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE FAMILY OF THE RESPONDENT
Service of The Letter Requesting for Proceedings, Defective Certificate of Delay, Adjournment of The Case
Service of The Letter Requesting for Proceedings
Service of the Letter Requesting for Proceedings
Service of the Letter Requesting for Proceedings, the Overriding Objective Principle Cannot Be Applied Blindly
SERVICE OF THE LETTER REQUESTING FOR PROCEEDINGS
SERVICE OF THE LETTER REQUESTING FOR PROCEEDING-TIME FRAME TO SERVE THE LETTER TO THE RESPONDENT
SERVICE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL AND THE RECORD OF APPEAL ON SUCH OTHER PARTIES TO THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS
Service of the Memorandum of Appeal, Record of Appeal and Notice of Appeal on the Respondents, The Law on Service and Proof of Service
Service of The Notice of Appeal On the Respondent
SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL ON THE RESPONDENTS
SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE RESPONDENT
Service of the Notice of Appeal, Appeals to the Court of Appeal, Within 60 Days, Failure to Serve the Notice of Appeal
Service of the Notice of Appeal
Service of the Notice of Motion, Application to Strike Out the Notice of Appeal, A PO Must Be Based on Facts as Apparent on the Record
Service of the Notice of Motion, PO Must Be on Pure Point of Law
Service of The Notice of the Notice On the Respondents
Service on the Respondent, Whether the Respondent Was Properly Served is an Illegality for Extension of Time
SET OFF OR COUNTER-CLAIM FROM CONSEQUENCES OF A MISTAKE, COUNTER -CLAIM PRESENTED NEARLY EIGHT YEARS AFTER DISCOVERY OF MISTAKE, WHETHER THE COUNTER CLAIM IS MAINTAINTANCE SECTION 41 OF
SET OFF, APPELLANT’S REMEDIES, APPELLANT PAID EXPENSES FOR THE VEHICLE, WHETHER HE CAN RECOVER BY SET OFF
Sickness as a Ground for Extension of Time, Factors for Extension of Time, Time Spent for Preparation of an Application,
SICKNESS AS GROUND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME- MERE DISCHARGE FROM HOSPITAL IS NOT INDICATION OF FULL RECOVERY FROM SICKNESS
SOME ORDER AMOUNT TO DECREES
SPECIAL DAMAGES AWARDED WHERE THEY ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY PLEADED
SPECIAL DAMAGES MUST BE SPECIFICALLY PLEADED AND PROVED
SPECIFIC DAMAGES MUST BE SPECIFICALLY PLEADED AND STRICTLY PROVED
STAMP IMPRESSION OF THE ATTESTING NOTARY PUBLIC AND COMMISIONER FOR OATHS PLACED ON THE AFFIDAVIT, WHETHER THAT STAMP IMPRESSION IS PART OF THE JURAT
STANDARD OF PROOF IN CIVIL CASES BEFORE THE PRIMARY COURT
STANDARD OF PROOF IN PRIMARY COURT
STATUS OF AN AWARD PASSED WHILE AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OF A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT HIM BEING INVOLVED IN THE PROCEEDINGS
STATUS OF AN AWARD WHICH IS PASSED WHILE AFFECT THE RIGHTS OF A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT HIM BEING INVOLVED IN THE PROCEEDINGS
STATUS QUO, ORDER TO MAINTAIN STATUS QUO
STATUTORY PROVISION FOR WITHDRAWING NOTICE OF APPEAL
STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO CONSULT WITH WORKERS ON INTENDED REDUNDANCY, AN APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MAY GRANTED BEFORE CONSULTATION TAKES PLACE
STAY OF EXECUTION CASES
STAY OF EXECUTION OF A DECREE, APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION IN COURT OF APPEAL, TIME WITHIN WHICH TO APPLY FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
Stay of Execution Where There is No Pending Appeal, Stay of Execution Pending Review
STAY OF EXECUTION, APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION, NO REASONABLE GROUND TO STAY OF EXECUTION, WHETHER COURT MAY GRANT THE APPLICATION FOR STAY
STAY OF EXECUTION, DOUBTS AS TO TRUE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN PROCEEDINGS FOR STAY OF EXECUTION, ORDER OF STAY GRANTED
STAY OF EXECUTION, WHETHER LEAVE TO APPEAL IS A CONDITION PRECEDENT FOR GRANT OF STAY OF EXECUTION
Striking Out Appeal Has Effect of Striking Out the Notice of Appeal, Absence of a Letter from the Registrar, Collecting Documents Without Invitation
STUDENTS UNION, COMPETENCE TO INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, STUDENTS ORGANIATION NOT REGISTRED AS SOCIETY
SUBMISSION OF ARBITRATION
Submissions Are Not Evidence, He Who Alleges Must Prove, Award of General Damages, Special Damages Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved
Substantial Loss a Condition for Stay Of Execution
SUBSTANTIAL LOSS AS A CONDITION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION-THE KIND OF LOSS MUST BE SPECIFIED, DETAILSOF LOSS MUST BE GIVEN’
SUIT AGAINST EXECUTIVE AGENCY
SUIT DIMISSED FOR NON-APPERANCE AND DEFENDENT GRANTED LEAVE TO PROVE CCOUNTER CLAIM EX PARTE
SUIT DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE AMOUNTS TO A DECREE
SUIT FILED IN THE NAME OF DEAD PERSON IS A NULLITY
SUIT GAINST GOVERMENT, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MAY BE ISSUED AGAINST THE GOVERMENT
SUIT INSTITUTED BEYOND PRESCRIBED LIMITATION PERIOD
SUIT INSTITUTED BY A SPECIFIED CORPORATION
SUITS AGAINST EXECUTIVE AGENCY
SUITS ARISING FROM TRA MAY BE ENTEAINED BY ORDINARY CIVIL COURTS, SECTION 7(1) OF CPC AND SECTION3 AND 7 OF TRA ACT 2000
SUITS, WITHDRAWAL OF SUITS, ORAL APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF SUIT
SUMMARY PROCEDURE, DEFENDANT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE AFTER HAVING BEEN GRANTED LEAVE TO APPLY TO DEFEND
SUMMARY PROCEDURE, SUIT INSTITUTTED UNDER ORDER xxxv OFTHE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
SUMMARY SUIT, LEAVE TO DEFEND A SUMMARY SUIT, LEAVE TO DEFEND MAY BE GRANTED IF THERE ARE TRIABLE ISSUES RAISED
SUO MOTU REVISIONAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
Superior Court Cannot Exercise Revisional Jurisdiction Without Being Seized with the Proceedings of Lower Court, Lost File, Missing Record,
T
THE NOTICE OF EXECUTION IS THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE COURT OR AN OFFICER OF THE COURT-THERE IS NO EXECUTION OF THE DECREE WITHOUT INVLOVING THE COURT
TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF PRIMARY COURT
TIME LIMIT FOR EFFECTING SERVICE OF LETTER REQUESTING CERTIFIED COPIES OF PROCEEDINGS
TYOR IS NOT GROUND FOR REVERSAL OF A DECISION OF A COURT
TIME BAARED MATTER WILL BE DISMISSED-THE LAW OF LIMITATION KNOWS NO SYMPATHS OR EQUITY-APPELLANT HAS NO ROOM TO APPEAL ON A FACT WHICH HE HAD CONCEDED
The Decision to Extend Chief Justice’s Tenure Upon Attaining Retirement Age is Constitutional, Jaji Mkuu Kuongezewa Muda wa Utumishi Baada ya Kufika Muda wa Kustaafu ni Sawa, HUMPHREY MALENGA-1
TAXATION CASES
TAXATION PROCEEDINGS ARE CONDUCTED BY TAXING OFFICERS
TAXATION, WHETHER JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT CAN TAX FEES OF AN ADVOCATE
TAXATION, WHETHER TAXING MASTER MAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT UNREACCEPTED ITEMS
TAXING OF BILL OF COSTS CAN BE EFFECTED EVEN IN ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES
TAXING OFFICER REFUSES TO CONDUCT TAXATION OF THE BILL OF COSTS, WHETHER PROPER
TECHNICAL DELAY BEHAVES IN A MANNER WHICH SUGGESTS MOREDELAYING TACTICS, CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO BENEFIT FROM HIS WRONGS
TEMPORARY AND INTERIM ORDERS OF INJUNCTION WHWTHER TIME PRESCRIBED FOR VALIDITY THEREOF BEGINS TO RUN FROM THE TIME OF COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER
TEMPORARY INJUCTON, CONDITIONS FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY INJUCTION, WHETHER FAILURE TO GRANT TEMPORARY INJUCTION MAY CAUSE IRREPARABLE LOSS OR INJURY TO THE APPLICANT
Temporary Injunction before the Court of Appeal, Decree Holder Holds a Prima Facie Title to Property or Right the Subject of Decree
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, CONDITIONS FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, APPLICANT HAS DEFAULTED PAYMENT OF A LOAN AND RESPONDENT GIVES NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPOINT A RECEIVER
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, RULING PRINCIPLES GUIDING COURTS IN GRANT TEMPORARY INJUCTIONS,
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, WHETHER AN APPEAL LIES AGAINST AN ORDER GRANTING OR REFUSING TO GRANT
Temporary Injunction before the Court of Appeal, Decree Holder Holds a Prima Facie Title to Property or Right the Subject of Decree
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, CONDITIONS FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, APPLICANT HAS DEFAULTED PAYMENT OF A LOAN AND RESPONDENT GIVES NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPOINT A RECEIVER
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, RULING PRINCIPLES GUIDING COURTS IN GRANT TEMPORARY INJUCTIONS,
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, WHETHER AN APPEAL LIES AGAINST AN ORDER GRANTING OR REFUSING TO GRANT
Tendering of Bank Statements, Vicarious Liability, Ub Jus Ibi Remedium, Amendment of the Memorandum of Appeal, Burden of Proof,
TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF COURTS IN ZANZIBAR
TETS OR CONDITIONS TO BE CONSIDRED WHETHER OR NOT TO INVOKE REVISIONARY POWERS
That the Intended Appeal Has Overwhelming Chances of Success is Not Relevant in an Application for Extension of Time, Second Bite
The Ambit and Parameters of the Court When Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction, in Revision the Court Cannot Re-Assess the Evidence on Record
The Ambit and Parameters of the Court When Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction, In Revision the Court Cannot Re-Assess the Evidence
The Ambit and Parameters of the Court When Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction, In Revision, The Court Cannot Re-evaluate Evidence on Record
The Ambit and Parameters of the Court When Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction, the Court Cannot Re-Assess the Evidence on Record
The Ambit and Parameters of the Court When Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction, The Court Cannot Re-Assess the Evidence, Conflicting Decisions
The Appellate Court is Bound to Consider the Grounds of Appeal Presented to It, Effect of Ground Raised in Submission, Right to be Heard
The Applicant Must Take Immediate Action After Becoming Aware That He is Out of Time, Factors for Extension of Time
The Award of Costs is Discretionary, Manifest Error On the Face of the Record as a Ground for Review
THE AWARD OF GENERAL DAMAGES
THE BORROWER IS A PROPER PARTY TO THE SUIT AND NOT A NECESSARY PARTY
The Burden of Proof in Unfair Termination Proceedings
THE BURDEN OF PROOF NEVER SHIFTS TO THE ADVERSE
The Certificate On a Point of Law Must Relate to The Decision in The Proceedings from Which an Appeal Has Arisen
THE CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW MUST RELATE TO THE DECISION IN THE PROCEEDINGS FROM WHICH AN APPEALBHAS ARISEN
THE CHARGEABILITY OF SKILLS AND DEVELOPMENT-EXEMPTION OF CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION FROM PAYMENT OF SDL
THE COMPOSITION OF THE DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL -INVOLVEMENT OF ASSESSORS IN THE DLHT
THE CONSEQUENCE OF USING INTERCHANGEABLY THE WORDS PETITION OR MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IN LAND APPEALS
The Constitutionality of Section 3 of the Law of Limitation Act Providing that the Time Barred Matter Shall be Dismissed
THE CONTENTS OF JUDGEMENT
The Court Can Decide On Unframed Issue If It Has Been Left to the Court for Decision, Un-pleaded Issues
The Court Cannot Close the Party’s Case, Remedy Against Unnecessary Adjournments is to Dismiss the Charge and Discharge the Accused
The Court Cannot Exercise Its Revisional Power to a Time Barred Appeal, Service of The Letter Requesting for Proceedings,
The Court Cannot Exercise Its Revisional Powers While Hearing an Appeal Which is Time Barred
The Court Cannot Exercise Its Revisionary Power On the Time Barred Appeal
THE COURT CANNOT GRANT INTEREST IN A CASE WHERE SUCH INTEREST WAS NOT PLEADED AND PROVED
THE COURT CANOT ENTERTAIN AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN APPLICATION WHICH THE COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE
THE COURT HAS NO DUTY TO GUIDE THE PARTIES ON PROPER STEPS AND THE PROPER TIME WITHIN WHICH SUCH STEPS ARE TO BE TAKEN
THE COURT IS EMPOWED AT ANY TIME BEFORE PASSING A DECREE TO AMEND OR FRAME A NEW ISSUE IN ADDITION TO THOSE FRAMED EALIER ON HOWEVER, PARTIES MUST BE HEARD ON THE NEW ISSUE
The Court is Empowered at Any Time Before Passing a Decree to Amend or Frame a New Issue in Addition to Those Framed Earlier On
THE COURT IS OBLIGED TO DECIDE ON EACH AND EVERY ISSUE FRAMED IN MAKING ITS DECISION
THE COURT SHOULD NOT ACT ON AN AMENDED PLEADING FILED WITHOUT LEAVE
The Court Should Not Raise New Issues While Composing the Judgement and Determine Them Without Hearing the Parties, The Right to Be Heard
THE DECISION GRANTING THE APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE THE EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT IS NOT APPEALABLE
The Decision of the High Court Judge Refusing to Recuse Himself from The Conduct of the Case is Interlocutory and Therefore Not Appealabl
The Demand Notice for Payment of the Tax Due is Not Appealable, Tax-Board Has No Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Non-Objection Decisions
The Description of the Suit Property Must be Stated, Documented Agreements Cannot Be Superseded by the Oral Account, Buyer Beware
The Duty of Advocates to the Court, Advocate Duty to the Court,
The Duty of the Successor Judge to Give Reasons for Taking Over the Case from Another Judge, The Rationale, Failure to Give Reasons is Fatal
THE EFFECT OF NOT JOINING A NECESSARY PARTY TO A CASE
THE ESSENCE OF ISSUANCE OF THE GARNISHEE ORDER NISI
THE EXECUTING COURT ENJOYS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO DEL WITH ANY QUESTIONS RELATING TO EXECUTION, DISCHARGE AND SATISFACTION OF DECREE
THE EXECUTING COURTS SHALL ONLY GRANT A CERTIFICATE OF SLAE AFTER THE SALE HAS BECOME ABSOLUTE-A SALE BECOMES ABSOLUTE AFTER THE EXECUTING COURT HAS MADE AN ORDER CONFIRMING THE SALE
THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IS ENTITLED TO RE-EVALUATE THE ENTIRE EVIDENCE ON THE RECORD AND MAY COME WITH ITS OWN FINDINGS-RULE 36(1) OF THE TCAR
THE FORM AND LANGUAGE IN WHICH THE ASSESSORS IN THE DLHT ARE REQUIRED TO GIVE THEIR OPNION
THE HIGH COURT’S ORDER DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR BEING TIME BARRED IS APPELABLE WIHOUT LEAVE-SOME ORDERS AMOUNT TO DECREES
The Issue of Jurisdiction is Very Fundamental and It May Be Raised at Any Stage, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts,
The Issue of Locus Standi Can be Raised at Any Stage, Who Has the Legal Capacity to Sue On Behalf of the Deceased Estate
The Judgment on Admission That Did Not Finally Determine the Entire Claims of the Parties is Interlocutory and Therefore Not Appealable
THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL TO REVIEW ITS OWN DECISIONS-GROUNDS FOR REVIEW-MANIFEST ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF RECORD AS A GROUND FOR REVIEW-REVIEW IS NOT AN APPEAL IN DISGUISE
The Jurisdiction to Certify Existence of Points of Law is Exclusively Vested in the High Court
THE JURISDICTION TO CERTIFY EXISTENCE OF POINTS OF LAW IS EXCLUSIVELY VESTED IN THE HIGH COURT
The Law and Principles Governing Review, Review in Not an Appeal, No Judgment Can Be Beyond Criticism
The Law Assists the Vigilant and Not Those Who Sleep, Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus, Principles Governing Review,
The Law Governing All Questions of Compensation for Unfair Termination, Compensation for Termination of the Contract of Service
THE LAW GOVERNING REVIEW
THE LAW OF LIMITATION ACT IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
The Law On Objection Proceedings, An Abuse of the Court Process
The Law Relating to Framing Issues, Parties in Adducing Evidence are Guided by Issues, Parties or Their Advocates Have Duty to Assist the Cour
The Manner of Making an Application for Reference, Principles Governing Application for Reference, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause
The Matter Cannot Be Dismissed On a Mention Date, The Dismissal Can Only Be Made On a Hearing Date, The Right to Be Heard
THE MATTER CANNOT BE DISMISSED ON A MENTION DATE
THE MEANING OF AN INTERPLEADER SUIT
THE MINISTER MAY EXTEND TIME BEFORE OR AFTER EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD
The only remedy available from an order of objection proceeding is to institute a suit.
THE ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT REFUSING TO EXTEND TIME IS ANY OTHER ORDER WHICH FALLS UNDER SECTION 5(1)(C) OF THE AJA
THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE PRINCIPLE
THE PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO CHOOSE THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM HE WISHES TO SUE-EXECUTION-NON-JOINDER OF A NECESSARY PARTY TO A SUIT
The Plaintiff May Call the Defendant as His Witness, Competency of Witnesses, A Person with Certificate of Title, Joint Ownership
The Position of the Law Regarding Applications for Leave to Appeal and for a Certificate on a Point of Law,
THE POWER OF REVIEW SHOULD NOT BE CONFUSED WITH APPELLATE POWERS
THE POWER OF THE MINISTER TO EXTEND THE PERIOD OF LIMITATION PRESCRIBED FOR ANY SUIT IS SUBJECT TO SOME CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
THE POWERS OF THE LABOUR COURT ON REVISION
THE POWERS OF THE WARD TRIBUNALS TO DETERMINE Land disputes have been stripped off
The Procedural Steps Before the Court Remands the Witness to Prison, Court Orders Must Be Obeyed, Disobedience of Court Orders
THE PROCEDURE FOR INITIATING AN APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE
THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN CASES WHERE THERE IS NON-JOINDER OR MISJOINDER OF PARTIES
THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN CASES WHERE THERE IS NON-JOINDER OR MISJOINDER OF PARTIES-THE EFFECT OF NOT JOINING A NECESSARY PARTY TO A CASE
THE PROCEDURE WHERE THE CLAIMANT IN AN INTERPLEADER SUIT IS GRANTED LEAVE TO BE JOINED AS A PLAINTIFF
THE QUESTION OF JURISDICTION IS VERY FUNDAMENTAL
The Rationale Behind Service of Notice of Appeal, Factors for Extension of Time, Definition of the Word Prejudice
The Remedy Against Incomplete Record of Appeal, the Remedy Against the Order of the Registrar of the High Court
The Requirement of a Certificate On a Point of Law, Appeals to the Court of Appeal from Ward Tribunal,
THE REQUIREMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR EACH DAY OF DELAY
THE REVIEW JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL-GROUNDS FOR REVIEW-REVIEW IS NOT AN APPEAL IN DISGUISE
The Right of Appeal, Appeals to the Court of Appeal Originating from Defunct Industrial Court
The Right of Appeal, Appeals to the Court of Appeal Originating from Defunct Industrial Court,
The Right of the Attorney General to Have Audience or to Intervene in the Proceedings is Not Automatic, Notice of Change of Advocate
The Right to Appeal Against an Ex Parte Judgement is Automatic, No Need to Set Aside, One Cannot Challenge Both an Order to Proceed Ex-Parte and Merit,
THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST AN EXPARTE DECREE IS AUTOMATIC AND DOES NOT DEPEND UPON THERE BEING A PRIOR PROCEEDINGTO SET ASIDE THE EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
The right to appeal against exparte judgment is automatic
The Right to be Heard, Audi Alteram Partem Rule,
The Right to Be Heard, Difference between Struck Out and Dismissal, Incompetent Petition Shall be Struck Out Not Dismissed
The Right to Be Heard, Extension of Time Upon Good Cause Being Shown, Factors for Extension of Time,
The Right to Be Heard
The Right to Be Heard
The Right to Be Heard
The Right to Be Heard
THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD-THE APPELLATE COURT IS REQUIRED TO ORDER A RETRIAL AFTER CONSIDERING THAT THE PARTIES WERE DENIED THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD DURING THE TRIAL
The Right to Have Legal Opinion, Failure to Apply for Leave to Appeal
The Role of the Appellate Court in Determining a First Appeal, It Should Determine the Appeal to Finality, Re-evaluation of Evidence
THE RULES AS TO THE PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS AND THE RULE AGAINST DEPARTURE FROM PLEADINGS ARE DIFFERENT PURPOSES
The Ruling of the High Court Dismissing the Application for Reference of the Decision of the Taxing Master in Bill of Costs, is Appealable with Leave
The Ruling of the High Court Refusing to Set Aside the Dismissal Order is Appealable with Leave, Revision is Not an Alternative to Appeal
The Ruling Striking Out the Application is Not appealable, The Application Struck Out While the Court was Composing the Ruling is Not Appealable,
THE RULING STRIKING OUT THE APPLICATION IS NOT APPELLABLE
THE SCHEME FOR APPLYING FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OR FOR CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW
THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW’S POWERS OF THE CAT
THE SECOND APPELLATE COURTS SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACTS OF THE TWO COURTS BELOW
THE STANDARD OF PROOFOF FRAUD IN CIVIL CASES IS HIGHER THAN A MERE BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES
The Suit Filed Against a Dead Person Shall Be Struck Out and Not Dismissed, It Cannot be Amended to Join a Legal Representative
The Third-Party Procedure, Application for Leave to Present a Third Party Notice,
The Time Within Which to Apply For Reference, The Principles Governing Reference
THE TRANSFER OF THE CASE TO THE RESIDENT MAGISTRATE WITH EXTENDED JURISDICTION, LACK OF THE TRANSFER ORDER IS FATAL AND CANNOT BE CURED BY THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE PRINCIPLE
THE TRANSFER OF THE CASE TO THE RESIDENT MAGISTRATE WITH EXTENDED JURISDICTION
THE TRIAL JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE IS BOUND TO RECORD ALL THE PROCEEDINGS AT THE LOCUS IN QUO
THEPRELIMINARY OBJECTION ON THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS POINT OF LAW
There Cannot Be Two Certificates of Delay Concurrently Applicable in Respect of the Same Matter
There is no need for further construction when parliament has clearly expressed its intentio
THERE IS NO ONE GENERAL RULE ON THE WAY FOWARD WHEN THE COURTS FACE MISSING RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS EACH CASE SHALL BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF ITS OWN SPECIAL CIRCUSTANCES
THERE IS NO RIGHT TO APPEALAGAINST DECISION OF THE HIGH COURT REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW-THE REMEDY IS TO APPLY FOR REVISION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
THERE MUST BE AN END TO LITIGATION BE IT IN CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEINGS
There Must Be an End to Litigation, Manifest Error On the Face of Record as A Ground for Review, Grounds for Review,
Third Party Procedure, Effect of Misspelling or Citing a Wrong Name in Legal Documents, Consolidation of Appeals,
THIRD PARTY PROCEDURE, Formulation and Amendment of Issues, Annexures Not Admitted as Exhibit Are Not Part of Evidence
THIRD PARTY PROCEDURE, Formulation and Amendment of Issues, Annexures Not Admitted as Exhibit Are Not Part of Evidence, VIGNAN EDUCATIONL
THREE OPTIONS WHERE ANY RELEVANT DOCUMENTS ARE OMITTED FROM THE RECORD OF APPEAL
THREE PRAYERS FOR INJUNCTIONS MADE IN ONE APPLICATION AND SUPPORTED BY ONE AFFIDAVIT, WHETHER PROPER IN LAND AND PRACTICE
Time Limit for Filing an Application for Revision is Within 60 Days, Exclusion of The Time Spent in The Preparation and Supply of Certified Copies,
TIME LIMIT FOR LODGEMENT OF AN APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE ON POINT OF LAW
TIME LIMIT FOR LODGING AN APPLICATION TO BE JOINED IN AN APPLICATION FOR REVISION COMMENCED BY THE CAT SUO MOTU
Time Limit for Suits Founded On Compensation is 12 Months, Grounds for Exemption from Limitation, Pre Court Negotiations is Not a Good Ground,
Time Limit to Set Aside ExParte Decision is 30 Days, When Time Start to Run, Policy Underlying Statutes of Limitation, Remedy Against Time-Barred,
TIME TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT IN MATTERS ORIGINATED FROM PRIMARY COURT
Time to File Notice of Appeal is 30 Days, Letter Requesting Proceedings and Notice of Appeal Must be Served to Respondent in order Time Spent to Obtain Proceedings to
TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, APPLICATION FILED OUT OF TIM, WHETHER APPEAL IS COMPETENT RULE 43(A) OF THE COURT OF APPEAL RULES
To Commit a Judgement Debtor to a Civil Prisoner Must be after Compliance of Conditions and Limitations, Factors and Procedures to Commit a Judgement Debtor to a Civil
TO INDICATE GROUNDS IN THE NOTICE OF MOTION IS MANDATORY AND FAILURE TO DO SO IS FATAL
Trespasser is Not Entitled to Compensation, Classification of Highways, Confirmation of Validity of Interests in Land Created by Operation Vijiji,
TRIBUNAL CASES
TWO CERTIFICATES OF DELAYED ISSUED CONCURRENTLY, EFFECT OF ISSUING AND VALIDITY OF THE SECOND CERTFICATE OF DELAY
TYPING ERROR IS NOT GROUND FOR REVERSAL OF A DECISION OF A COURT
U
ULTRA VIRES AND ABUSE OF POWER AS GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
UPON AMENDEMENT OF A PLEADING THE PREVIOUS PLEADING CEASES TO HAVE ANY LEGAL EFFECT
V
VARIANCE OF NAMES OF THE PARTIES IN THE DOCUMENTS FILED FOR APPEAL PURPOSES
VALIDITY OF THE CERTICATE OF DELAY-TIME TO APPEAL START TO RUN WHEN THE APPELLANT BECOMES AWARE THAT THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS FOR APPEAL PURPOSES ARE READY FOR COLLECTIO
VALIDITY AND LEGAL COMPETENCE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL
Validity of the Judgment Delivered in the Absence of the Parties,
VERIFICATION BY COMPANIES, WHO MAY VERIFY COMPANY PLEADINGS AND HOW
VERIFICATION CASES
W
WAY FORWARD UPON FAILURE TO ATTACH NOTES OF LOCUS IN QUO
Where one or both parties do not appear but written submission have been filed, hearing of
WAIVER OF SERVICE OF RECORD OF APPEAL WHERE THERE IS NOBODY TO ACCEPT SERVICE FOR THE RESPONDENT
WANT OF PROSECUTION CASES
Warehousing Costs Must Be Considered in Assessing Value of the Stock of Imported Goods for Tax Purposes, Undeclared Foreign Transport Costs,
WAY FOWARD WHEN COURT IS FACED WITH MISSING RECORD
WHAT ENTAILS PRELIMINARY OBJECTION
WHAT IT MEANS BY FULL AND MEANINGFUL ENJOYMENT OF A RIGHT TO BE HEARD
WHAT QUALIFIES TO BE AN ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD
WHAT RECPRD IS REFFERED TO UNDER RULE 66 (1) OF THE CAT-RULES
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE IN ORDER TO BE BELIVED AND SUCEED IN A CIVIL ACTION
WHEN DOES A MAGISTRATE’S COURT BECOME FUNCTUS OFFICIO
When Does a Sale in Execution of Decree Become Absolute, Executing Court Can Only Sale the Property of Judgment Debtor, Bonafide Purchaser,
WHEN STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE IS AT VARIANCE WITH STATEMENT WITHIN WHICH LEAVE WAS GRANTED
WHEN THE AVERMENT IN AN AFFIDAVIT IS NOT CONTRADICTED, THEN THERE IS NO NEED OF SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT FROM ANOTHER PERSON
WHEN THE COURT BECOMES FUNCTUS OFFICIO
When the Decision is Made On an Objection Proceeding, there is No Remedy for Appeal or Revision, the Only Remedy is to Institute a Fresh Suit,
Whenever a Record of Appeal is Incomplete, The Appellant May Be Accorded an Opportunity to File a Supplementary Record,
WHENEVER AN APPLICATION MAY BE MADE EITHER TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OR TO THE HIGH COURT, IT SHALL IN THE FIRST INSTANCE BE MADE TO THE HIGH COURT
WHERE A PARTY HAS A RIGHT OF APPEAL HE CANNOT INVOKE REVISONAL POWERS OF THE COURT-IF THERE IS A RIGHT OF APPEAL THEN THAT RIGHT HAS TO BE PURSUED
WHERE A PARTY HAS A RIGHT OF APPEAL, HE CANNOT INVOKE REVISIONAL POWERS OF THE COURT, REVISIONAL IS NOT AN ALTERNATIVE TO APPEAL
WHERE A PRELIMINARY OBJECTION IS RAISED, IT SHOULD BE HEARD FIRST BEFORE THE DISPOSAL OF THE MATTER ON MERITS
WHERE APPEAL LIES WITH A CERTIFICATE ON A POINT OF LAW, THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL MUST CONTAIN ONLY GROUNDS CERTIFIED BY THE HIGH
Where the Appeal is Struck All Documents Go Away, Where a Notice of Appeal is Struck Out Other Documents Remain,
WHERE THE ISSUE WHICH LEADS TO DISPOSAL OF THE MATTER IS RAISED SUO MOTU BY THE COURT, THEN COSTS ARE NOT AWARDED
Where There is a Wrong There Must Be a Remedy, Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium, Admission of Expert Evidence, Specific Damages,
WHETHER A DECREE OF THE HIGH COURT REQUIRED COURT OF APPEAL RULES
WHETHER A MAGISTRATE WITH EXTENDED JURISDICTION CAN PRESIDE THE HIGH COURT, SECTION 45 OF THE MAGISTRATES COURTS ACT
WHETHER A MAGISTRATE WITH EXTENDED JURISDICTIONCAN PRESIDE OVER THE HIGH COURT SECTION45 OF MAGISTRATE COURT ACT
WHETHER A MATTER THAT IS NOT APPELLABLE BECOMES AUTOMATICALLY REVISIONABLE
WHETHER A REJOINDER TO REPLY TO A COUNTER AFFIDAVIT IS PERMISSIBLE
WHETHER A TRIAL JUDGE CAN REVIEW AND QUASH HIS OWN JUDGEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS
WHETHER AN APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL IS INSTITUTED BY NOTICE OF APPEAL, APPEAL AND NOTICE OF APPEAL DISTINGUISHED
WHETHER CERTIFICATE OF POINT OF LAW IS NECESSARY, PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATE OF POINT OF LAW
WHETHER CORRECT TO USE THE DOLLAR TO CALTULATE JUDICIAL COMPENSATION FOR PURPOSE OF, SETING DEVALUATION
WHETHER COURT MAY GRANT INJUNCTION IN BREACH OF EXPRESS CONTRACTUAL TERMS IN A LEADING AGREEMENT
WHETHER DEFAULT JUDGEMENT MAY BE ENTERED DURING MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS
WHETHER HIGH COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAINING A CTHE CLAIM SECTION 13 OF CPC
WHETHER IT NECESSARY TO OBTAIN LEAVE BEFORE MAKING THE AMENDEMENTS
WHETHER LEAVE TO APPEAL MAY BE GRANTED SUO MOTU
WHETHER NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED IN THE SUB REGISTRY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL AND SIGNED ON BEHALF OF DEPUTY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IS VALID
WHETHER ORDINARY COURTS HAVE CONCURRENT JURISDICTION IN HOUSING TRIBUNALS UNDER THE RENT RESTRICTION
WHETHER PLANTIFF MAY PROVE ENTIRE CASE BY AFFIDAVIT, ORDER 9 RULE 6 AND ORDER 19, RULE 1 OF THE CPC
WHETHER PRIMARY COURTS HAVE JURISDICTION WHERE THE ESTATE CONSISTS OF REGISTRED LAND
Whether Relief Not Prayed for in the CMA Form No. 1 Can Be Granted, Matters Not Raised in Lower Courts,
WHETHER SPECIFIED PUBLIC CORPORATION HAS LOCUS STANDI TO SUE IN ITS OWN NAME
Whether the conditions similarly apply to arbitration proceedings against that defendant section 67 of the Tanzania Habours Authority Act 1977
WHETHER THE DEFINITION OF JUDGE FOR PURPOSES OF SIGNING A DECREE INCLUDES A REGIONAL MAGISTRATE
WHETHER THE MODIFICATION IN G.N NUMBER 376 OF 1968 APPLIES WHERE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ONE OF SEVERAL DEFENANTS
WHETHER THE WORDS WHEN THE SUIT IS CALLED FOR HEARING REFER TO AN ADJOUNED DATE OF HEARING
WHETHER TRIAL COURT MUST MAKE A SPECIFIC FINDING ON EACH AND EVERY ISSUE FRAMED
WHO MAY REVOLK CLAUSE IN ARBITRATION CLAUSE
WHO MAY SIGN DECREE
WITHDRAWAL AND RE-FILING OF A SUIT, COURT GRANTS LEAVE TO WITHDRAWAL A SUIT AND RE-FILE IT ON TERMS THAT THE APPLICANT PAYS THE COSTS OF THE SUIT WITHDRAWN,
WITHDRAWAL OF SUIT WITHOUT LEAVE OD COURT TO FILE A FRESH SUIT, NO FRESH SUIT IN RESPECT OF SAME SUBJECT MATTER MAY BE FILED
WITHDRAWAL OF SUIT,LIBERTY TO BRING A FRESH SUIT AFTER WITHDRAWAL
Withdrawal Without Leave to Refile, Application for Leave to File Representative Suit, – Suit with Many Parties,
WRITTEN SUBMISSION BY THE ORDER OF THE COURT, GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
Wrong Citation is Not Fatal, Insert Proper Provision by Hand, Party Should not be Punished for Wrong Done by His Advocate, Alliance One Tobacco,
Wrong Citation of the Enabling Provision is Curable, No Appeal Lies from an Order Rejecting an Application for Review, Second Application,
Wrong or Non Citation of the Enabling Provision is Curable, Account for Each Day of Delay,
Wrong_Citation_of_the_Enabling_Provision_is_Curable,
Y
Z
- POWERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL TO ORDER TEMPORARY INJUNCTION