Administrative Law cases

You need to login to view the following contents. Please Login. Not a Member? Join Us

A

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, CHALLENGING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FOR BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL

An Order of the High Court Refusing an Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review is Appealable and Not Subject of Revision

APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS DISMISSED BECAUSE OF AVAILABILITY OF ALTERATIVE REMEDY BY WAY OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY IS SUBSEQUENTLY MADE, WHATHER THE SUBJECT

APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISONS MADE BY RESPONDENTS IN A PRIVATE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP

APPLICATION FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS , HIGH COURT FINDS THAT THE MINISTER’S DECISION IS LEGALLY ERRONEOUS, WHETHER HIGH COURT HAS DISCREATION NOT TO GRANT THE ORDERS

APPLICATIONS, DUTY TO SERVE NOTICE OF MOTION AND ACCOMPANYING AFFIDAVIT, WHETHER THE DUTY TO SERVE IS ON THE COURT REGISTRY OR ON THE APPLICANT RULE 52(1) AND 53(1) OF THE TANZANIA COURT OF APPEAL RU

AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM, RIGHT TO BE HEARD

B

BIAS, TEST TO BE APPLIED WHERE THERE IS ALLEGATION OF BIAS

C

COMPLAINT ARAISING FROM CONTRACT, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN APPLICANT AND RESPONDENT BEING CONTRCTUAL, WHETHER ACTS ARSISING FROM THAT RELATIONSHIP ARE AMENABLE TO JUDICIAL REVIEW

D

DELEGATION POWERS, POWEER TO ISSUE CLOVE EXPORT PERMIT

DAMAGES, GENERAL DAMAGES, PLEADING STATING SPECIFIC AMOUNT AS GENERAL DAMAGES PRAYED FOR, WHETHER PROPER

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF PARASTATAL ORGAN, DECISION OF ON MERITS AND SUBSTANCE, WHETHER APPELLABLE

E

ENABLING PROVSIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS, WHETHER THE MINING ACT 1979 HAS PROVSIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS

ERROR OF LAW, ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL EQUATING ACCEPTANCE OF TERMINAL BENEFITS WITH CONSENT TO THE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT, AN ERROR OF LAW

FAILURE BY THE LABOUR CONCILIATION BOARD TO ALLOW PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS TO CALL MATERIAL WITNESSESS, A BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE

F

G

GOVEREMENT FILES A SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF TZS 8 MILLION IN THE HIGH COURT

GROUNDS FOR AWARD OF CERTIORARI, ERROR OF LAW AS GROUND FOR AWARDING CERTIORARI

H

I

INHERENT JURISDICTION OF THE COURT, SITUATIONS IN WHICH THE INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT MAY BE INVOKED, SECTION 95 OF THE CPC

J

JUDICIAL REVIEW, PROCEDURE, PRELIMINARY OBJECTION NOT RAISED AT THE HEARING OF THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR PREROGATIVE ORDER, WHETHER THE OBJECTION MAY BE RAISED SUBSEQUENTLY AGAINST

JURISDICTION OF COURTS IN SUITS BY THE GOVERMENT

JUDICIAL REVIEW ADAMINISTRATIVE ACTION, NATURE AND SOURCE OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINITSRATIVE ACTION

JURISDICTION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE BODY,REQUIREMENT OF QUORUM, SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF COOPERATIVE UNION TRANSACTING BUSINESS AN DMAKING DECISION WITHOUT HAVING THE PRESCRIBED QUORUM

K

L

LIMITATION PERIOD FOR APPLICATIONS FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS

M

MINISTER ACTS ON ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED EX-PARTE AND DECIDES APPEAL WITHOUT FIRST DISCLOSING IT TO THE OTHER PARTY, BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE

N

O

ORDER OF CERTIORARI PROTECTING ABSATRACT LEGALITY WITHOUT ANY TANGIABLE BENEFITS, ORDER OF CERTIORARI LIKELY TO LEAD TO PROLONGED DISPUTE AND ENDLESS LITIGATION, WHETHER THE ORDER WILL SERVE PUBLIC I

P

PRACTICAL EFFECT OF CERTIORARI, ORDER OF CERTIORARI SOUGHT BY APARTY NO LONGER CAPABLE OF BENEFITING FROM IT, WHETHER THE COURT MAY GRANT CERIORARI

PREROGATIVE ORDERS, ENABLING PROVISIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS, WHETHER THE MINING ACT 1979 HAS PROVISIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS

PREROGATIVE ORDERS, INTERIM RELIEF, APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEF PENDING INTENDED APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE VTO APPLY FOR JUDICISL REVIEW, WHETHER THE HIGH COURT MAY ENTERTAIN

PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE, THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD, EFFECT OF BREACH OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE ON THE DECISION TAKEN

Q

R

RIGHT TO BE HEARD VS ACCESS TO JUSTICE

RIGHT TO BE HEARD

RIGHT TO BE HEARD, COMMITTEE SERVED WITH NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DISSOLVE IT FAILS TO DELIVER ITS DEFENCE TO THE REGISTRAR AS DIRECTED, WHETHER THAT FAILURE AMOUNTS TO FORFEITURE OF THE COMMITEE’S RIG

RULE AGAINST BIAS, DEPUTY MINISTER STATING IN PARLIAMENT THAT TENDER WAS IMPROPERLY AWARDED TO APPLICANT AND FRESH TENDER WILL BE FLOATED TO AWARD IT TO ANOTHER PERSON IN A MORE TRANSPARENT MANNER

The Right to Be Heard, Audi Alteram Partem, He Who Alleges Must Prove, Discontinuation from Studies, Service of Letters, JAMES KUSAGA v. SEKOMU

S

T

Time Limit to Apply for Leave to Apply for Prerogative Orders, Effect of Fraud or Mistake

U

V

W

WHETHER CERTIORARI IS AVAILABLE AUTOMATICALLY UPON PROOF GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED BY COURT IN DECIDING TO GRNAT CERTIORARI OR NOT

WHETHER RETIREMENT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST IS A DISPLINARY PROCEEDING

WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD-JUSTICE MUST BE SOUGHT WITHIN THE RULES, AND EVEN SYMPATHY ALONE WOULD NOT ASSIST A PARTY WHO IS NEGLIGENT

Y

Z