- PREROGATIVE ORDER=PRAYER FOR THE PREROGATIVE ORDER OF DECLARATION MUST COME UNDER LAW REFORM FATAL ACCIDENT
- JUDICIAL REVIEW IS APPLICABLE IF NO ANY OTHER REMEDY
- PREROGATIVE ORDERS CAN NOT BE ISSUED AGAINST THE PRIVATE BODY
- MEANING OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND COURT WITH JURISDICTION FOR JR
Attachments
-
CERTIRARI AND MANDAMUS
-
WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR LEGAL AID
-
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PETITION BY ORIGINATING SUMMONS, APPROACH THE COURT SHOULD TAKE
-
ENFORCEMENT OF BASIS RIGHTS, WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE TO SEEK ENFORCEMENT OF EVERY BASIC RIGHT INFRINGED BY PETITINING THE HIGH COURT
-
ENFORCEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, RIGHT TO CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF MANDATORY REQUIREMENT TO DEPOSIT TZS 5 MILLION FOR THE COSTS FOR ELECTION PETITION TO BE HEARD, ARTICLE 30(3) AND S.
-
ENFORCXEMNT OF BASIC RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
-
FILLING OF PETITIONS UNDER THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT, FILLING MUST BE BY ORIGINATING SUMMONS, PETITION TOUCHES ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSITUTION , EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE PETIT
-
LOCUS STANDI, LEGAL ACTION AGAINST INFRINGEMENT OF BASIC RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
-
PETITION AGAINST THE GOVERMENT
-
PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF BASIC RIGHT
-
PROVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS NEED TO BE CONSTRUED LIBERALLY, WITH ELESTIOCITY AND NOT RESTRICTIVELY OR RIGIDLY, COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS NECVESSARY
-
RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE, RIGHT TO SEEK JUSTICE THOUGH COURTS OF LAW, MANDATORY REQUIREMENT TO DEPOSIT TZS 5 MILLION FOR ELECTION PETITION
-
'S WORK AS QUARANTEED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
-
'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT O WORK
-
WHETHER COMPLAINANTS WHO ARE NOT NATURAL PERSONS MAY HAVE LOCUS STANDI TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION, ARTICLE 30(3) OF THE CONSTITUTION AND SECTION 4 OF THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT ACT
-
WHETHER NOTICE TO THE GOVERMENT IS NECESSARY BEFORE INSTITUTING PETITION
-
CERTIRARI AND MANDAMUS
-
LIMITATION OF TIME IN WHICH TO APPLY FOR LEAVE FOR CERTIORARI
-
Res Judicata in Public Interest Cases, Interested Person Can Appeal Against the Decision of the High Court in Public Interest Cases, EMMANUEL SIMFORIAN MASSAWE
-
VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PERSONAL FREEDOM, THE RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON TO BE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTILL PROVED GUILTY AS GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLES 13(6)(B) AND 15 OF THE CONSTITUTION, PROCEDUR
-
WHETHER HIGH COURT SITTING WITH A SINGLE JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DETERMINE ANY MATTER RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF BASIC RIGHTS QUARANTEED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION SECTION10